-
-
HOME
-
-
PDF (letter size)
Solving ode’s using parametric methods
January 29, 2024 Compiled on January 29, 2024 at 3:24am
1 First order ODE
Let the nonlinear ode be In parametric methods we let and . If we can isolate or then we
can solve the ode using this method. This method can be simpler than the direct
method when the ode is nonlinear. This is really should only be attempted for
nonlinear odes. This is learned best by examples. I will add more background theory
later.
1.1 Both are present in the ode
1.1.1 Example 1
Solve Let . The above becomes Let’s see if we can isolate first. Solving for gives
Since does not depend on , then we can continue. Using (3) then (will show how this came
about later)
This is separable ode
Hence the solution to (1) is
The above is the solution to (1) in parametric form where the dependency between and is
via . We can stop here. But let see if we can get the solution as as the normal case is.
Eliminating between 4(1) and 4(2) results in the solution And the above is the final
nonparametric solution. It is an implicit solution.
We might think this method is complicated, but it is actually much simpler than the first
method. How would we solve (1) directly? We will starting by solving for in (1) which
gives
Starting with the first one above, we notice it is homogeneous ode. Let and it becomes This
is separable which results in The above integrals gives a very complicated antiderivative.
After that we have to replace back by and simplify. We would do the same for the second
ode in (5). It is clear here that the parametric method is simpler. But for the parametric
method to work, we would have to be able to isolate or from (1) and obtain function in the
first case or in the second case in order to continue. We also need to be able to
eliminate at the end in order to get an explicit solution, This could proof to be
tricky.
In the above example, we isolated . Let see what happens if we choose to isolate from (2)
instead. Solving for gives
Hence this works also. In this case we have
This is separable. Solving gives
Eliminating from (6,7) gives the solution or Which is an implicit solution.
1.1.2 Example 2
Solve This problem from chapter 7, problem 7. From Boole book, page 137. This is actually
a clairaut ode. Let . The above becomes Solving for gives
Since does not depend on then
This is non-linear ode in . So this is no better than what we started. Let try to isolate
instead. Solving (1) for gives
Therefore But . Hence this method does not work for this ode.
1.2 Only is present in the ode
1.2.1 Example 1
When only or (but not both) are present, we can do the following. Solve This
is problem chapter 7, problem 7. From Boole book, page 137. Let . The above
becomes
Where . Hence . But from the above . Hence
Hence
Therefore is Where is the variable. Hence the solution from (2) becomes
1.2.2 Example 2
Solve Let
Where . Hence . But from the above . Hence
Solving for gives Hence the solution from (2) becomes (for the first root)
And for the second root
These methods produce simpler solution if we can solve for easily in the above.
1.3 Only is present
1.3.1 Example 1
Let therefore
But . But from the above . Hence
Therefore
is eliminated between (1,2) to obtain the final solution. From (2) there are roots for . For
example, looking at the first root Substituting this in (1) gives one solution to the ode as
There are 3 more solutions.
2 References
- Nonlinear ordinary differential equations in transport processes. William F.
Ames. Academic press 1968. page 41.
- Differential equations by George Boole. 1865. page 133.