4.10 HW 10
4.10.1 Problems listing
PDF
-
- PDF (letter size)
-
- PDF (legal size)
4.10.2 Problem 1
Given Make a 3D integral and use the transformation from Cartesian to spherical coordinates to
evaluate .
Solution
Figure 4.27:Spherical coordinates
The relation between the Cartesian and spherical coordinates is
The 3D integral in Cartesian coordinates is But in spherical coordinates. The above now
simplifies to Changing integration from Cartesian to spherical and changing the limits
accordingly. the above becomes
The Jacobian is
The relation between Cartesian and spherical in (1) shows that
Substituting the above in (3) gives
Expanding along the last row to find the determinant (since last row has most number of zeros in
it) gives the determinant as
Therefore Substituting the Jacobian in integral (2) gives
Since is just an integration variable, changing it to gives Which is what we asked to
show.
4.10.3 Problem 2
Follow the lecture example of deriving the gravitational field of a thin shell and calculate the
gravitational potential of such a shell over all space
Solution
4.10.3.1 Field outside the shell
Figure 4.28:Problem setup
The gravitational field at point as shown in the diagram will be determined. The point is at
distance from the center of the shell. Due to symmetry any radial direction can be used as
axis.
A small ring is considered as shown. The field due to this at point is due to vertical contribution
only, since horizontal contribution cancel out. This means field due to this ring is given
by
Where is the mass of the ring. But , where is the surface area of the ring between and
.
Figure 4.29:Surface area of ring
Hence Where is the circumference. Hence (1) becomes
Where is the surface mass density of the shell. But from the above diagram Using this in (2)
gives
is now found from Pythagoras theorem (another option would have been to use the cosine angle
rule)
Therefore Substituting this in (3) gives The above is the field at point due to the small ring
shown. To find the contribution from all of the shell, we need to integrate the above, which gives
Let , then . When and when . Hence the integral (4) becomes
Where
To evaluate . Let Hence
Therefore
When and when . Hence becomes
Since , the above can be written as
Now that is found, similar calculation is made to evaluate from (7) Similar to , Let Hence
Hence becomes
The first integral in above is, and since
The second integral in (9) is As was done for , the above simplifies to
Substituting (10,11) back in (9) gives
Now that and are found in (8) and (12), then substituting these in (5) gives
But , which is the mass of the shell. Hence the above becomes This is the field strength at
distance from the center of the shell, where . This shows that the field strength is the same as if
the total mass of the shell was concentrated at a point in its center.
Now we need to obtain the potential energy of a particle of mass located at distance from the
center of the shell. Taking potential energy of to be zero at , the potential energy is the work
needed to move from to distance from center of shell. But work done is where is the wight of
which is . Hence The minus sign inside the integral is because the weight acts down, which is in
the negative direction. The minus sign outside the integral is because work is done being done to
increase the of the mass. The rule is that, if work increases the potential energy of , then it is
negative. Since is zero at infinity, then this work is negative. Therefore the above becomes
Therefore the gravitational potential energy of mass at distance from center of shell
is
4.10.3.2 Field inside the shell
Figure 4.31:Problem setup
Let be any arbitrary location inside the shell. Then the field at due to contribution
from only is And the field at due to contribution from only is The mass due to is
pulling upwards and the mass due to is pulling down. If we can show that these
fields are of equal strength, then this shows the net gravitational field will be zero at
.
But where is the solid angle made by the area as shown above. By symmetry, this is the same
solid angle made by . Therefore Therefore the net gravitational field is zero at . Since
is arbitrary point. Then any point inside the shell will have zero net gravitational
field.
Potential energy of a particle of mass inside the shell is the same as the potential energy at
surface of the shell, this is because inside the shell.
Using the same derivation of potential energy in part 1 above gives
Therefore the gravitational potential energy of mass anywhere inside the shell is
4.10.4 Problem 3
Follow the lecture example of deriving the gas pressure and calculate the number of gas particles
hitting the container per unit area per unit time. Give your answer in terms of the net number
density and the average speed of these particles.
Solution
Figure 4.32:Problem setup
In the above diagram is the average speed of particles in the direction within time from hitting
. The number of particles per unit volume with velocity and is given by Where above is the
magnitude (speed) of . During interval , the number of particles hitting the wall is which is
therefore given by
Where is the unit volume shown in the diagram. But Therefore (1) becomes
The above is the number of particles hitting of the wall in interval .
4.10.5 Problem 4
Derive the expressions of the orbital angular momentum operators in spherical coordinates.
Show that Solution
Where is vector whose components are the orbital angular momentum operators and is a
vector whose components are the position operators and is a vector whose components are the
momentum operators and is the vector cross product. In Cartesian coordinates, are the
orthonormal basis. Hence
Hence the corresponding components of are
But in Quantum mechanics, the operators are
Hence (1) becomes
Or
Hence in Cartesian coordinates Now the above is converted to spherical coordinates. The relation
between the Cartesian and spherical coordinates is
We also need expression for . But by chain rule
To evaluate the above, we need to do the reverse of (2), which is to relate to . From the geometry
we see that
Therefore, from (3) But and . The above becomes
And from (4)
But and and . The above becomes
Hence
And from (5)
But and . Therefore
The above completes all the terms needed to find . Hence, using (6,7,8) above gives
Now the same thing is repeated to find in spherical coordinates. From (3) But and . The above
becomes
And from (4)
But and and . The above becomes
Hence
And from (5)
But . Therefore
The above completes all the terms needed to find . Hence, using (10,11,12) above gives
Now the same thing is repeated to find in spherical coordinates. From (3) But and . The above
becomes
And from (4)
But and . The above becomes
Hence
And from (5) Hence, since RHS does not depend on then
The above completes all the terms needed to find . Hence, using (14,15,16) above gives
The above completes all derivations needed to find in Spherical coordinates. Eqs (9,13,17). Here
they are in one place.
Given Eq(1A) found earlier (repeated below)
And given (9,13,17), then (1A) becomes
But . The above becomes
Simplifying gives
Or
Or
Or
Or
The above are in spherical coordinates. Therefore
But
And
And Hence
Or
Which simplifies to
Hence
Therefore
But the term in the RHS above is indeed the Laplacian in spherical coordinates. Therefore in
spherical coordinates
Which is what we are asked to show.
4.10.6 Problem 5
Consider for . Given and Find that satisfies the following partial differential equation
Where are positive constants.
Solution
Using separation of variables, assuming the solution is Where is function that depends on space
only and is function that depends on only. Substituting the above into the PDE (1) gives Diving
both sides by gives
Since both sides are equal, and left side depends on only and right side depends on only, then
both must be equal to a constant. Let this constant be . This gives the following two ODE’s to
solve
Starting with the spatial ODE in order to determine the eigenvalues
With the boundary conditions transferred from the PDE as
There are three cases to consider. .
case
Let for some real. Then the ODE (4) becomes . The roots of the characteristic equation are .
Hence the solution is
At , the above becomes Hence the solution now reduces to At , this becomes But since and .
Therefore the only option is that . But this gives trivial solution . Therefore is not
possible.
case
The ODE (4) now becomes This has solution . At this gives . Therefore the solution now
reduces to . At this gives , which implies . But this gives trivial solution . Therefore is not
possible.
case
In this case, the roots of the characteristic equation of ODE (4) are . Hence the solution can
written as (by using Euler relation to convert complex exponentials to trigonometric functions) as
At the above gives Hence the solution now reduces to At For non-trivial solution this requires
that or for . Therefore the eigenvalues are This completes the solution to the spatial part. The
eigenfunctions are therefore
Now the time domain part ODE is solved. This is ODE (2) above. Now that the eigenvalues are
known, ODE (2) becomes
This is linear first order ODE. The integrating factor is . The above now becomes Integrating
gives
But are the eigenvalues, given by for. Rewriting the above gives
But since the solution was assumed to be , then But the general solution is a linear combination
of all the solutions . Therefore
And using (5,6) in the above, gives But the two constants can be merged into one, say .
Therefore the above becomes
The above is the general solution. What is left is to determine . This is done from initial
conditions. At the above becomes The above says that are the Fourier sine series
coefficients of the initial conditions. To determine , orthogonality of eigenfunctions is
used.
Multiplying both sides of the above by and integration both sides from to gives
Case
The sum above now collapses to one term only when , since the functions are orthogonal to each
others, which gives
The integral , is evaluated using the relation the integral becomes
Hence Eq. (8) becomes
Case
The sum above now collapses to one term only, since the functions are orthogonal to each others,
so only for the sum gives a result. Hence
case
The sum now collapses to case when , since the functions are orthogonal to each others. Hence
Therefore (now calling since a dummy index)
The integral , is evaluated using the relation The integral becomes, where here
Hence
Using and on the above gives (where in this case)
Hence (9) becomes
Now all coefficients of the Fourier sine series are found. Therefore the solution (7) becomes
Therefore the final solution is When then . Therefore only odd terms survive
4.10.7 key solution for HW 10
PDF