2 detailed summary tables of results

 2.1 Detailed conclusion table per each integral for all CAS systems
 2.2 Detailed conclusion table specific for Rubi results

2.1 Detailed conclusion table per each integral for all CAS systems

Detailed conclusion table per each integral is given by table below. The elapsed time is in seconds. For failed result it is given as F(-1) if the failure was due to timeout. It is given as F(-2) if the failure was due to an exception being raised, which could indicate a bug in the system. If the failure was due to integral not being evaluated within the time limit, then it is given just an F.

In this table,the column normalized size is defined as \(\frac{\text{antiderivative leaf size}}{\text{optimal antiderivative leaf size}}\)











Problem 1 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac Rubi in Sympy










grade A A A A A A A A A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 16 16 11 10 18 20 22 19 8
normalized size 1 1. 0.69 0.62 1.12 1.25 1.38 1.19 0.5
time (sec) N/A 0.023 0.014 0.016 1.521 0.241 0.328 0.203 1.003




















Problem 2 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac Rubi in Sympy










grade A A B A F(-2) A F F F(-1)
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 19 38 46 13 0 65 0 0 0
normalized size 1 2. 2.42 0.68 0. 3.42 0. 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 6. 0.047 0.146 0. 0.24 0. 0. 0.




















Problem 3 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac Rubi in Sympy










grade A B A A A A A A F(-1)
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 19 42 19 35 72 58 32 49 0
normalized size 1 2.21 1. 1.84 3.79 3.05 1.68 2.58 0.
time (sec) N/A 1.01 0.059 0.105 1.595 0.247 2.922 0.222 0.




















Problem 4 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac Rubi in Sympy










grade A A A A A A F A F(-1)
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 19 31 19 26 53 55 0 35 0
normalized size 1 1.63 1. 1.37 2.79 2.89 0. 1.84 0.
time (sec) N/A 3.373 0.047 0.149 1.544 0.236 0. 0.214 0.




















Problem 5 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac Rubi in Sympy










grade A F A A F(-1) A F(-1) F F(-1)
verified N/A N/A Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 43 0 61 17 0 42 0 0 0
normalized size 1 0. 1.42 0.4 0. 0.98 0. 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 1.344 0.092 0.085 0. 0.232 0. 0. 0.




















Problem 6 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac Rubi in Sympy










grade A F B A F(-1) A F(-1) F F(-1)
verified N/A N/A Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 25 0 63 19 0 50 0 0 0
normalized size 1 0. 2.52 0.76 0. 2. 0. 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 1.304 0.103 0.086 0. 0.264 0. 0. 0.




















Problem 7 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac Rubi in Sympy










grade A A B A A A A A A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 14 14 79 12 20 18 27 34 14
normalized size 1 1. 5.64 0.86 1.43 1.29 1.93 2.43 1.
time (sec) N/A 0.018 0.016 0.019 1.478 0.235 0.427 0.202 1.16




















Problem 8 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac Rubi in Sympy










grade A A A A A A A A A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 34 34 15 13 16 36 60 61 15
normalized size 1 1. 0.44 0.38 0.47 1.06 1.76 1.79 0.44
time (sec) N/A 0.033 0.016 0.019 1.508 0.233 1.557 0.2 0.926




















Problem 9 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac Rubi in Sympy










grade A A A A F(-2) A F(-1) A A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 54 54 50 53 0 1 0 97 39
normalized size 1 1. 0.93 0.98 0. 0.02 0. 1.8 0.72
time (sec) N/A 0.119 0.112 0.072 0. 0.263 0. 0.206 3.799










2.2 Detailed conclusion table specific for Rubi results

The following table is specific to Rubi. It gives additional statistics for each integral. the column steps is the number of steps used by Rubi to obtain the antiderivative. The rules column is the number of unique rules used. The integrand size column is the leaf size of the integrand. Finally the ratio \(\frac{\text{number of rules}}{\text{integrand size}}\) is given. The larger this ratio is, the harder the integral was to solve. In this test, problem number [2] had the largest ratio of [ 0.4444 ]

Table 1: Rubi specific breakdown of results for each integral














# grade
number of
steps
used
number of
unique
rules
normalized
antiderivative
leaf size
integrand
leaf size
\(\frac{\text{number of rules}}{\text{integrand leaf size}}\)







1 A 2 2 1. 10 0.2







2 A 43 12 2. 27 0.444







3 B 25 7 2.21 31 0.226







4 A 32 9 1.63 35 0.257







5 F 0 0 N/A 0 N/A







6 F 0 0 N/A 0 N/A







7 A 2 2 1. 10 0.2







8 A 3 3 1. 10 0.3







9 A 3 3 1. 12 0.25