1.2 Results

Important note: A number of problems in this test suite have no antiderivative in closed form. This means the antiderivative of these integrals can not be expressed in terms of elementary, special functions or Hypergeometric2F1 functions. RootSum and RootOf are not allowed.

If a CAS returns the above integral unevaluated within the time limit, then the result is counted as passed and assigned an A grade.

However, if CAS times out, then it is assigned an F grade even if the integral is not integrable, as this implies CAS could not determine that the integral is not integrable in the time limit.

If a CAS returns an antiderivative to such an integral, it is assigned an A grade automatically and this special result is listed in the introduction section of each individual test report to make it easy to identify as this can be important result to investigate.

The results given in in the table below reflects the above.




System % solved % Failed



Rubi 98.74 ( 705 ) 1.26 ( 9 )
Mathematica 97.90 ( 699 ) 2.10 ( 15 )
Fricas 96.22 ( 687 ) 3.78 ( 27 )
Maple 87.82 ( 627 ) 12.18 ( 87 )
IntegrateAlgebraic 87.25 ( 623 ) 12.75 ( 91 )
Giac 66.39 ( 474 ) 33.61 ( 240 )
Mupad 57.00 ( 407 ) 43.00 ( 307 )
Maxima 52.52 ( 375 ) 47.48 ( 339 )
Sympy 28.71 ( 205 ) % 71.29 ( 509 )



Table 1.1:Percentage solved for each CAS

The table below gives additional break down of the grading of quality of the antiderivatives generated by each CAS. The grading is given using the letters A,B,C and F with A being the best quality. The grading is accomplished by comparing the antiderivative generated with the optimal antiderivatives included in the test suite. The following table describes the meaning of these grades.



grade

description





A

Integral was solved and antiderivative is optimal in quality and leaf size.



B

Integral was solved and antiderivative is optimal in quality but leaf size is larger than twice the optimal antiderivatives leaf size.



C

Integral was solved and antiderivative is non-optimal in quality. This can be due to one or more of the following reasons

  1. antiderivative contains a hypergeometric function and the optimal antiderivative does not.

  2. antiderivative contains a special function and the optimal antiderivative does not.

  3. antiderivative contains the imaginary unit and the optimal antiderivative does not.



F

Integral was not solved. Either the integral was returned unevaluated within the time limit, or it timed out, or CAS hanged or crashed or an exception was raised.



Table 1.2:Description of grading applied to integration result

Grading is implemented for all CAS systems. Based on the above, the following table summarizes the grading for this test suite.






System % A grade % B grade % C grade % F grade





Rubi 97.48 0.56 0.70 1.26
Mathematica 78.85 5.60 13.31 2.10
Fricas 75.07 20.87 0.28 3.78
IntegrateAlgebraic 74.09 7.84 5.32 12.75
Maple 53.22 24.93 9.66 12.18
Giac 46.08 19.47 0.84 33.61
Maxima 44.54 6.16 1.82 47.48
Sympy 22.55 5.18 0.98 71.29
Mupad N/A 57.00 0.00 43.00





Table 1.3:Antiderivative Grade distribution of each CAS

The following is a Bar chart illustration of the data in the above table.

pict

The figure below compares the CAS systems for each grade level.

pict

The following table shows the distribution of the different types of failure for each CAS. There are 3 types of reasons why it can fail. The first is when CAS returns back the input within the time limit, which means it could not solve it. This the typical normal failure F .

The second is due to time out. CAS could not solve the integral within the 3 minutes time limit which is assigned F(-1).

The third is due to an exception generated. Assigned F(-2). This most likely indicates an interface problem between sagemath and the CAS (applicable only to FriCAS, Maxima and Giac) or it could be an indication of an internal error in CAS. This type of error requires more investigations to determine the cause.






System

Number failed

Percentage normal failure

Percentage timeout failure

Percentage exception failure






Rubi

9

100.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %






Mathematica

15

100.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %






Maple

87

97.70 %

0.00 %

2.30 %






Fricas

27

0.00 %

92.59 %

7.41 %






IntegrateAlgebraic

91

92.31 %

7.69 %

0.00 %






Giac

240

60.00 %

11.67 %

28.33 %






Maxima

339

94.40 %

0.29 %

5.31 %






Sympy

509

83.69 %

16.31 %

0.00 %






Mupad

307

94.14 %

5.86 %

0.00 %






Table 1.4:Failure statistics for each CAS