Integrand size = 29, antiderivative size = 18 \[ \int \frac {-2304+2304 e^{100}-864 e^{200}+144 e^{300}-9 e^{400}}{512 x^3} \, dx=\frac {9 \left (2-\frac {e^{100}}{2}\right )^4}{64 x^2} \]
[Out]
Time = 0.01 (sec) , antiderivative size = 16, normalized size of antiderivative = 0.89, number of steps used = 2, number of rules used = 2, \(\frac {\text {number of rules}}{\text {integrand size}}\) = 0.069, Rules used = {12, 30} \[ \int \frac {-2304+2304 e^{100}-864 e^{200}+144 e^{300}-9 e^{400}}{512 x^3} \, dx=\frac {9 \left (4-e^{100}\right )^4}{1024 x^2} \]
[In]
[Out]
Rule 12
Rule 30
Rubi steps \begin{align*} \text {integral}& = -\left (\frac {1}{512} \left (9 \left (4-e^{100}\right )^4\right ) \int \frac {1}{x^3} \, dx\right ) \\ & = \frac {9 \left (4-e^{100}\right )^4}{1024 x^2} \\ \end{align*}
Time = 0.00 (sec) , antiderivative size = 14, normalized size of antiderivative = 0.78 \[ \int \frac {-2304+2304 e^{100}-864 e^{200}+144 e^{300}-9 e^{400}}{512 x^3} \, dx=\frac {9 \left (-4+e^{100}\right )^4}{1024 x^2} \]
[In]
[Out]
Leaf count of result is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. \(27\) vs. \(2(13)=26\).
Time = 0.06 (sec) , antiderivative size = 28, normalized size of antiderivative = 1.56
method | result | size |
gosper | \(\frac {\frac {9 \,{\mathrm e}^{400}}{1024}-\frac {9 \,{\mathrm e}^{300}}{64}+\frac {27 \,{\mathrm e}^{200}}{32}-\frac {9 \,{\mathrm e}^{100}}{4}+\frac {9}{4}}{x^{2}}\) | \(28\) |
norman | \(\frac {\frac {9 \,{\mathrm e}^{400}}{1024}-\frac {9 \,{\mathrm e}^{300}}{64}+\frac {27 \,{\mathrm e}^{200}}{32}-\frac {9 \,{\mathrm e}^{100}}{4}+\frac {9}{4}}{x^{2}}\) | \(29\) |
default | \(-\frac {-\frac {9 \,{\mathrm e}^{400}}{512}+\frac {9 \,{\mathrm e}^{300}}{32}-\frac {27 \,{\mathrm e}^{200}}{16}+\frac {9 \,{\mathrm e}^{100}}{2}-\frac {9}{2}}{2 x^{2}}\) | \(30\) |
parallelrisch | \(-\frac {-\frac {9 \,{\mathrm e}^{400}}{512}+\frac {9 \,{\mathrm e}^{300}}{32}-\frac {27 \,{\mathrm e}^{200}}{16}+\frac {9 \,{\mathrm e}^{100}}{2}-\frac {9}{2}}{2 x^{2}}\) | \(30\) |
risch | \(\frac {9 \,{\mathrm e}^{400}}{1024 x^{2}}-\frac {9 \,{\mathrm e}^{300}}{64 x^{2}}+\frac {27 \,{\mathrm e}^{200}}{32 x^{2}}-\frac {9 \,{\mathrm e}^{100}}{4 x^{2}}+\frac {9}{4 x^{2}}\) | \(35\) |
[In]
[Out]
none
Time = 0.26 (sec) , antiderivative size = 21, normalized size of antiderivative = 1.17 \[ \int \frac {-2304+2304 e^{100}-864 e^{200}+144 e^{300}-9 e^{400}}{512 x^3} \, dx=\frac {9 \, {\left (e^{400} - 16 \, e^{300} + 96 \, e^{200} - 256 \, e^{100} + 256\right )}}{1024 \, x^{2}} \]
[In]
[Out]
Leaf count of result is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. 36 vs. \(2 (14) = 28\).
Time = 0.03 (sec) , antiderivative size = 36, normalized size of antiderivative = 2.00 \[ \int \frac {-2304+2304 e^{100}-864 e^{200}+144 e^{300}-9 e^{400}}{512 x^3} \, dx=- \frac {- \frac {9 e^{400}}{512} - \frac {27 e^{200}}{16} - \frac {9}{2} + \frac {9 e^{100}}{2} + \frac {9 e^{300}}{32}}{2 x^{2}} \]
[In]
[Out]
none
Time = 0.20 (sec) , antiderivative size = 21, normalized size of antiderivative = 1.17 \[ \int \frac {-2304+2304 e^{100}-864 e^{200}+144 e^{300}-9 e^{400}}{512 x^3} \, dx=\frac {9 \, {\left (e^{400} - 16 \, e^{300} + 96 \, e^{200} - 256 \, e^{100} + 256\right )}}{1024 \, x^{2}} \]
[In]
[Out]
none
Time = 0.26 (sec) , antiderivative size = 21, normalized size of antiderivative = 1.17 \[ \int \frac {-2304+2304 e^{100}-864 e^{200}+144 e^{300}-9 e^{400}}{512 x^3} \, dx=\frac {9 \, {\left (e^{400} - 16 \, e^{300} + 96 \, e^{200} - 256 \, e^{100} + 256\right )}}{1024 \, x^{2}} \]
[In]
[Out]
Time = 9.73 (sec) , antiderivative size = 11, normalized size of antiderivative = 0.61 \[ \int \frac {-2304+2304 e^{100}-864 e^{200}+144 e^{300}-9 e^{400}}{512 x^3} \, dx=\frac {9\,{\left ({\mathrm {e}}^{100}-4\right )}^4}{1024\,x^2} \]
[In]
[Out]