Integrand size = 35, antiderivative size = 17 \[ \int \frac {500+440 x+32 x^2+(500+40 x) \log (4)+(2500+200 x) \log \left (x^2\right )}{25 x} \, dx=\left (1+\frac {4 x}{5}+\log (4)+5 \log \left (x^2\right )\right )^2 \]
[Out]
Leaf count is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. \(43\) vs. \(2(17)=34\).
Time = 0.04 (sec) , antiderivative size = 43, normalized size of antiderivative = 2.53, number of steps used = 8, number of rules used = 6, \(\frac {\text {number of rules}}{\text {integrand size}}\) = 0.171, Rules used = {12, 14, 77, 2388, 2338, 2332} \[ \int \frac {500+440 x+32 x^2+(500+40 x) \log (4)+(2500+200 x) \log \left (x^2\right )}{25 x} \, dx=\frac {16 x^2}{25}+25 \log ^2\left (x^2\right )+8 x \log \left (x^2\right )-16 x+\frac {8}{5} x (11+\log (4))+20 (1+\log (4)) \log (x) \]
[In]
[Out]
Rule 12
Rule 14
Rule 77
Rule 2332
Rule 2338
Rule 2388
Rubi steps \begin{align*} \text {integral}& = \frac {1}{25} \int \frac {500+440 x+32 x^2+(500+40 x) \log (4)+(2500+200 x) \log \left (x^2\right )}{x} \, dx \\ & = \frac {1}{25} \int \left (\frac {4 (25+2 x) (5+4 x+5 \log (4))}{x}+\frac {100 (25+2 x) \log \left (x^2\right )}{x}\right ) \, dx \\ & = \frac {4}{25} \int \frac {(25+2 x) (5+4 x+5 \log (4))}{x} \, dx+4 \int \frac {(25+2 x) \log \left (x^2\right )}{x} \, dx \\ & = \frac {4}{25} \int \left (8 x+\frac {125 (1+\log (4))}{x}+10 (11+\log (4))\right ) \, dx+8 \int \log \left (x^2\right ) \, dx+100 \int \frac {\log \left (x^2\right )}{x} \, dx \\ & = -16 x+\frac {16 x^2}{25}+\frac {8}{5} x (11+\log (4))+20 (1+\log (4)) \log (x)+8 x \log \left (x^2\right )+25 \log ^2\left (x^2\right ) \\ \end{align*}
Leaf count is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. \(45\) vs. \(2(17)=34\).
Time = 0.01 (sec) , antiderivative size = 45, normalized size of antiderivative = 2.65 \[ \int \frac {500+440 x+32 x^2+(500+40 x) \log (4)+(2500+200 x) \log \left (x^2\right )}{25 x} \, dx=\frac {8 x}{5}+\frac {16 x^2}{25}+\frac {8}{5} x \log (4)+20 \log (x)+20 \log (4) \log (x)+8 x \log \left (x^2\right )+25 \log ^2\left (x^2\right ) \]
[In]
[Out]
Leaf count of result is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. \(40\) vs. \(2(17)=34\).
Time = 0.06 (sec) , antiderivative size = 41, normalized size of antiderivative = 2.41
method | result | size |
norman | \(\left (\frac {8}{5}+\frac {16 \ln \left (2\right )}{5}\right ) x +\left (10+20 \ln \left (2\right )\right ) \ln \left (x^{2}\right )+\frac {16 x^{2}}{25}+25 \ln \left (x^{2}\right )^{2}+8 x \ln \left (x^{2}\right )\) | \(41\) |
parallelrisch | \(\frac {16 x \ln \left (2\right )}{5}+20 \ln \left (2\right ) \ln \left (x^{2}\right )+\frac {16 x^{2}}{25}+8 x \ln \left (x^{2}\right )+25 \ln \left (x^{2}\right )^{2}+\frac {8 x}{5}+10 \ln \left (x^{2}\right )\) | \(44\) |
risch | \(\frac {16 x \ln \left (2\right )}{5}+\frac {16 x^{2}}{25}+\frac {8 x}{5}+40 \ln \left (2\right ) \ln \left (x \right )+20 \ln \left (x \right )+8 x \ln \left (x^{2}\right )+100 \ln \left (x \right ) \ln \left (x^{2}\right )-100 \ln \left (x \right )^{2}\) | \(46\) |
parts | \(\frac {16 x \ln \left (2\right )}{5}+\frac {16 x^{2}}{25}+\frac {8 x}{5}+40 \ln \left (2\right ) \ln \left (x \right )+20 \ln \left (x \right )+8 x \ln \left (x^{2}\right )+100 \ln \left (x \right ) \ln \left (x^{2}\right )-100 \ln \left (x \right )^{2}\) | \(46\) |
default | \(\frac {16 x^{2}}{25}+\frac {8 x}{5}+20 \ln \left (x \right )+\frac {8 \ln \left (2\right ) \left (2 x +25 \ln \left (x \right )\right )}{5}+8 x \ln \left (x^{2}\right )+100 \ln \left (x \right ) \ln \left (x^{2}\right )-100 \ln \left (x \right )^{2}\) | \(47\) |
[In]
[Out]
none
Time = 0.23 (sec) , antiderivative size = 37, normalized size of antiderivative = 2.18 \[ \int \frac {500+440 x+32 x^2+(500+40 x) \log (4)+(2500+200 x) \log \left (x^2\right )}{25 x} \, dx=\frac {16}{25} \, x^{2} + \frac {16}{5} \, x \log \left (2\right ) + 2 \, {\left (4 \, x + 10 \, \log \left (2\right ) + 5\right )} \log \left (x^{2}\right ) + 25 \, \log \left (x^{2}\right )^{2} + \frac {8}{5} \, x \]
[In]
[Out]
Leaf count of result is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. 44 vs. \(2 (19) = 38\).
Time = 0.09 (sec) , antiderivative size = 44, normalized size of antiderivative = 2.59 \[ \int \frac {500+440 x+32 x^2+(500+40 x) \log (4)+(2500+200 x) \log \left (x^2\right )}{25 x} \, dx=\frac {16 x^{2}}{25} + 8 x \log {\left (x^{2} \right )} + \frac {x \left (40 + 80 \log {\left (2 \right )}\right )}{25} + 20 \cdot \left (1 + 2 \log {\left (2 \right )}\right ) \log {\left (x \right )} + 25 \log {\left (x^{2} \right )}^{2} \]
[In]
[Out]
Leaf count of result is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. 39 vs. \(2 (19) = 38\).
Time = 0.18 (sec) , antiderivative size = 39, normalized size of antiderivative = 2.29 \[ \int \frac {500+440 x+32 x^2+(500+40 x) \log (4)+(2500+200 x) \log \left (x^2\right )}{25 x} \, dx=\frac {16}{25} \, x^{2} + \frac {16}{5} \, x \log \left (2\right ) + 8 \, x \log \left (x^{2}\right ) + 25 \, \log \left (x^{2}\right )^{2} + 40 \, \log \left (2\right ) \log \left (x\right ) + \frac {8}{5} \, x + 20 \, \log \left (x\right ) \]
[In]
[Out]
Leaf count of result is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. 40 vs. \(2 (19) = 38\).
Time = 0.27 (sec) , antiderivative size = 40, normalized size of antiderivative = 2.35 \[ \int \frac {500+440 x+32 x^2+(500+40 x) \log (4)+(2500+200 x) \log \left (x^2\right )}{25 x} \, dx=\frac {16}{25} \, x^{2} + \frac {8}{5} \, x {\left (2 \, \log \left (2\right ) + 1\right )} + 8 \, x \log \left (x^{2}\right ) + 25 \, \log \left (x^{2}\right )^{2} + 20 \, {\left (2 \, \log \left (2\right ) + 1\right )} \log \left (x\right ) \]
[In]
[Out]
Time = 10.84 (sec) , antiderivative size = 27, normalized size of antiderivative = 1.59 \[ \int \frac {500+440 x+32 x^2+(500+40 x) \log (4)+(2500+200 x) \log \left (x^2\right )}{25 x} \, dx=\frac {\left (4\,x+25\,\ln \left (x^2\right )\right )\,\left (4\,x+25\,\ln \left (x^2\right )+20\,\ln \left (2\right )+10\right )}{25} \]
[In]
[Out]