Integrand size = 59, antiderivative size = 20 \[ \int \frac {e^{32} \left (1024+4096 x+4608 x^2+2048 x^3+320 x^4\right )+\left (32 x+96 x^2+96 x^3+40 x^4+6 x^5\right ) \log ^2(2)}{\log ^2(2)} \, dx=(2+x)^4 \left (x^2+\frac {64 e^{32} x}{\log ^2(2)}\right ) \]
[Out]
Leaf count is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. \(82\) vs. \(2(20)=40\).
Time = 0.02 (sec) , antiderivative size = 82, normalized size of antiderivative = 4.10, number of steps used = 4, number of rules used = 1, \(\frac {\text {number of rules}}{\text {integrand size}}\) = 0.017, Rules used = {12} \[ \int \frac {e^{32} \left (1024+4096 x+4608 x^2+2048 x^3+320 x^4\right )+\left (32 x+96 x^2+96 x^3+40 x^4+6 x^5\right ) \log ^2(2)}{\log ^2(2)} \, dx=x^6+8 x^5+\frac {64 e^{32} x^5}{\log ^2(2)}+24 x^4+\frac {512 e^{32} x^4}{\log ^2(2)}+32 x^3+\frac {1536 e^{32} x^3}{\log ^2(2)}+16 x^2+\frac {2048 e^{32} x^2}{\log ^2(2)}+\frac {1024 e^{32} x}{\log ^2(2)} \]
[In]
[Out]
Rule 12
Rubi steps \begin{align*} \text {integral}& = \frac {\int \left (e^{32} \left (1024+4096 x+4608 x^2+2048 x^3+320 x^4\right )+\left (32 x+96 x^2+96 x^3+40 x^4+6 x^5\right ) \log ^2(2)\right ) \, dx}{\log ^2(2)} \\ & = \frac {e^{32} \int \left (1024+4096 x+4608 x^2+2048 x^3+320 x^4\right ) \, dx}{\log ^2(2)}+\int \left (32 x+96 x^2+96 x^3+40 x^4+6 x^5\right ) \, dx \\ & = 16 x^2+32 x^3+24 x^4+8 x^5+x^6+\frac {1024 e^{32} x}{\log ^2(2)}+\frac {2048 e^{32} x^2}{\log ^2(2)}+\frac {1536 e^{32} x^3}{\log ^2(2)}+\frac {512 e^{32} x^4}{\log ^2(2)}+\frac {64 e^{32} x^5}{\log ^2(2)} \\ \end{align*}
Time = 0.01 (sec) , antiderivative size = 23, normalized size of antiderivative = 1.15 \[ \int \frac {e^{32} \left (1024+4096 x+4608 x^2+2048 x^3+320 x^4\right )+\left (32 x+96 x^2+96 x^3+40 x^4+6 x^5\right ) \log ^2(2)}{\log ^2(2)} \, dx=\frac {x (2+x)^4 \left (64 e^{32}+x \log ^2(2)\right )}{\log ^2(2)} \]
[In]
[Out]
Leaf count of result is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. \(77\) vs. \(2(21)=42\).
Time = 0.16 (sec) , antiderivative size = 78, normalized size of antiderivative = 3.90
method | result | size |
risch | \(x^{6}+8 x^{5}+\frac {64 x^{5} {\mathrm e}^{32}}{\ln \left (2\right )^{2}}+24 x^{4}+\frac {512 x^{4} {\mathrm e}^{32}}{\ln \left (2\right )^{2}}+32 x^{3}+\frac {1536 x^{3} {\mathrm e}^{32}}{\ln \left (2\right )^{2}}+16 x^{2}+\frac {2048 x^{2} {\mathrm e}^{32}}{\ln \left (2\right )^{2}}+\frac {1024 \,{\mathrm e}^{32} x}{\ln \left (2\right )^{2}}\) | \(78\) |
gosper | \(\frac {x \left (x^{5} \ln \left (2\right )^{2}+8 x^{4} \ln \left (2\right )^{2}+64 x^{4} {\mathrm e}^{32}+24 x^{3} \ln \left (2\right )^{2}+512 x^{3} {\mathrm e}^{32}+32 x^{2} \ln \left (2\right )^{2}+1536 \,{\mathrm e}^{32} x^{2}+16 x \ln \left (2\right )^{2}+2048 x \,{\mathrm e}^{32}+1024 \,{\mathrm e}^{32}\right )}{\ln \left (2\right )^{2}}\) | \(90\) |
default | \(\frac {x^{6} \ln \left (2\right )^{2}+\frac {2 \left (160 \,{\mathrm e}^{32}+20 \ln \left (2\right )^{2}\right ) x^{5}}{5}+\frac {\left (1024 \,{\mathrm e}^{32}+48 \ln \left (2\right )^{2}\right ) x^{4}}{2}+\frac {2 \left (2304 \,{\mathrm e}^{32}+48 \ln \left (2\right )^{2}\right ) x^{3}}{3}+\left (2048 \,{\mathrm e}^{32}+16 \ln \left (2\right )^{2}\right ) x^{2}+1024 x \,{\mathrm e}^{32}}{\ln \left (2\right )^{2}}\) | \(93\) |
parallelrisch | \(\frac {x^{6} \ln \left (2\right )^{2}+64 x^{5} {\mathrm e}^{32}+8 x^{5} \ln \left (2\right )^{2}+512 x^{4} {\mathrm e}^{32}+24 x^{4} \ln \left (2\right )^{2}+1536 x^{3} {\mathrm e}^{32}+32 x^{3} \ln \left (2\right )^{2}+2048 \,{\mathrm e}^{32} x^{2}+16 x^{2} \ln \left (2\right )^{2}+1024 x \,{\mathrm e}^{32}}{\ln \left (2\right )^{2}}\) | \(94\) |
norman | \(\frac {x^{6} \ln \left (2\right )+\frac {8 \left (8 \,{\mathrm e}^{32}+\ln \left (2\right )^{2}\right ) x^{5}}{\ln \left (2\right )}+\frac {32 \left (48 \,{\mathrm e}^{32}+\ln \left (2\right )^{2}\right ) x^{3}}{\ln \left (2\right )}+\frac {8 \left (64 \,{\mathrm e}^{32}+3 \ln \left (2\right )^{2}\right ) x^{4}}{\ln \left (2\right )}+\frac {16 \left (128 \,{\mathrm e}^{32}+\ln \left (2\right )^{2}\right ) x^{2}}{\ln \left (2\right )}+\frac {1024 \,{\mathrm e}^{32} x}{\ln \left (2\right )}}{\ln \left (2\right )}\) | \(106\) |
[In]
[Out]
Leaf count of result is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. 61 vs. \(2 (19) = 38\).
Time = 0.25 (sec) , antiderivative size = 61, normalized size of antiderivative = 3.05 \[ \int \frac {e^{32} \left (1024+4096 x+4608 x^2+2048 x^3+320 x^4\right )+\left (32 x+96 x^2+96 x^3+40 x^4+6 x^5\right ) \log ^2(2)}{\log ^2(2)} \, dx=\frac {{\left (x^{6} + 8 \, x^{5} + 24 \, x^{4} + 32 \, x^{3} + 16 \, x^{2}\right )} \log \left (2\right )^{2} + 64 \, {\left (x^{5} + 8 \, x^{4} + 24 \, x^{3} + 32 \, x^{2} + 16 \, x\right )} e^{32}}{\log \left (2\right )^{2}} \]
[In]
[Out]
Leaf count of result is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. 95 vs. \(2 (19) = 38\).
Time = 0.03 (sec) , antiderivative size = 95, normalized size of antiderivative = 4.75 \[ \int \frac {e^{32} \left (1024+4096 x+4608 x^2+2048 x^3+320 x^4\right )+\left (32 x+96 x^2+96 x^3+40 x^4+6 x^5\right ) \log ^2(2)}{\log ^2(2)} \, dx=x^{6} + \frac {x^{5} \cdot \left (8 \log {\left (2 \right )}^{2} + 64 e^{32}\right )}{\log {\left (2 \right )}^{2}} + \frac {x^{4} \cdot \left (24 \log {\left (2 \right )}^{2} + 512 e^{32}\right )}{\log {\left (2 \right )}^{2}} + \frac {x^{3} \cdot \left (32 \log {\left (2 \right )}^{2} + 1536 e^{32}\right )}{\log {\left (2 \right )}^{2}} + \frac {x^{2} \cdot \left (16 \log {\left (2 \right )}^{2} + 2048 e^{32}\right )}{\log {\left (2 \right )}^{2}} + \frac {1024 x e^{32}}{\log {\left (2 \right )}^{2}} \]
[In]
[Out]
Leaf count of result is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. 61 vs. \(2 (19) = 38\).
Time = 0.19 (sec) , antiderivative size = 61, normalized size of antiderivative = 3.05 \[ \int \frac {e^{32} \left (1024+4096 x+4608 x^2+2048 x^3+320 x^4\right )+\left (32 x+96 x^2+96 x^3+40 x^4+6 x^5\right ) \log ^2(2)}{\log ^2(2)} \, dx=\frac {{\left (x^{6} + 8 \, x^{5} + 24 \, x^{4} + 32 \, x^{3} + 16 \, x^{2}\right )} \log \left (2\right )^{2} + 64 \, {\left (x^{5} + 8 \, x^{4} + 24 \, x^{3} + 32 \, x^{2} + 16 \, x\right )} e^{32}}{\log \left (2\right )^{2}} \]
[In]
[Out]
Leaf count of result is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. 61 vs. \(2 (19) = 38\).
Time = 0.27 (sec) , antiderivative size = 61, normalized size of antiderivative = 3.05 \[ \int \frac {e^{32} \left (1024+4096 x+4608 x^2+2048 x^3+320 x^4\right )+\left (32 x+96 x^2+96 x^3+40 x^4+6 x^5\right ) \log ^2(2)}{\log ^2(2)} \, dx=\frac {{\left (x^{6} + 8 \, x^{5} + 24 \, x^{4} + 32 \, x^{3} + 16 \, x^{2}\right )} \log \left (2\right )^{2} + 64 \, {\left (x^{5} + 8 \, x^{4} + 24 \, x^{3} + 32 \, x^{2} + 16 \, x\right )} e^{32}}{\log \left (2\right )^{2}} \]
[In]
[Out]
Time = 0.08 (sec) , antiderivative size = 93, normalized size of antiderivative = 4.65 \[ \int \frac {e^{32} \left (1024+4096 x+4608 x^2+2048 x^3+320 x^4\right )+\left (32 x+96 x^2+96 x^3+40 x^4+6 x^5\right ) \log ^2(2)}{\log ^2(2)} \, dx=x^6+\frac {\left (320\,{\mathrm {e}}^{32}+40\,{\ln \left (2\right )}^2\right )\,x^5}{5\,{\ln \left (2\right )}^2}+\frac {\left (2048\,{\mathrm {e}}^{32}+96\,{\ln \left (2\right )}^2\right )\,x^4}{4\,{\ln \left (2\right )}^2}+\frac {\left (4608\,{\mathrm {e}}^{32}+96\,{\ln \left (2\right )}^2\right )\,x^3}{3\,{\ln \left (2\right )}^2}+\frac {\left (4096\,{\mathrm {e}}^{32}+32\,{\ln \left (2\right )}^2\right )\,x^2}{2\,{\ln \left (2\right )}^2}+\frac {1024\,{\mathrm {e}}^{32}\,x}{{\ln \left (2\right )}^2} \]
[In]
[Out]