Integrand size = 47, antiderivative size = 22 \[ \int \left (-180+172 x+4 e^{\frac {e^8}{4}} x-60 x^2+8 x^3+e^{\frac {e^8}{8}} \left (-36+40 x-12 x^2\right )\right ) \, dx=2 \left (9+x \left (-5-e^{\frac {e^8}{8}}+x\right )\right )^2 \]
[Out]
Leaf count is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. \(70\) vs. \(2(22)=44\).
Time = 0.01 (sec) , antiderivative size = 70, normalized size of antiderivative = 3.18, number of steps used = 3, number of rules used = 1, \(\frac {\text {number of rules}}{\text {integrand size}}\) = 0.021, Rules used = {6} \[ \int \left (-180+172 x+4 e^{\frac {e^8}{4}} x-60 x^2+8 x^3+e^{\frac {e^8}{8}} \left (-36+40 x-12 x^2\right )\right ) \, dx=2 x^4-4 e^{\frac {e^8}{8}} x^3-20 x^3+2 \left (43+e^{\frac {e^8}{4}}\right ) x^2+20 e^{\frac {e^8}{8}} x^2-36 e^{\frac {e^8}{8}} x-180 x \]
[In]
[Out]
Rule 6
Rubi steps \begin{align*} \text {integral}& = \int \left (-180+\left (172+4 e^{\frac {e^8}{4}}\right ) x-60 x^2+8 x^3+e^{\frac {e^8}{8}} \left (-36+40 x-12 x^2\right )\right ) \, dx \\ & = -180 x+2 \left (43+e^{\frac {e^8}{4}}\right ) x^2-20 x^3+2 x^4+e^{\frac {e^8}{8}} \int \left (-36+40 x-12 x^2\right ) \, dx \\ & = -180 x-36 e^{\frac {e^8}{8}} x+20 e^{\frac {e^8}{8}} x^2+2 \left (43+e^{\frac {e^8}{4}}\right ) x^2-20 x^3-4 e^{\frac {e^8}{8}} x^3+2 x^4 \\ \end{align*}
Leaf count is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. \(46\) vs. \(2(22)=44\).
Time = 0.02 (sec) , antiderivative size = 46, normalized size of antiderivative = 2.09 \[ \int \left (-180+172 x+4 e^{\frac {e^8}{4}} x-60 x^2+8 x^3+e^{\frac {e^8}{8}} \left (-36+40 x-12 x^2\right )\right ) \, dx=2 x \left (-90+43 x+e^{\frac {e^8}{4}} x-10 x^2+x^3-2 e^{\frac {e^8}{8}} \left (9-5 x+x^2\right )\right ) \]
[In]
[Out]
Time = 0.19 (sec) , antiderivative size = 22, normalized size of antiderivative = 1.00
method | result | size |
default | \(2 \left ({\mathrm e}^{\frac {{\mathrm e}^{8}}{8}} x -x^{2}+5 x -9\right )^{2}\) | \(22\) |
gosper | \(2 x \left (x \,{\mathrm e}^{\frac {{\mathrm e}^{8}}{4}}-2 \,{\mathrm e}^{\frac {{\mathrm e}^{8}}{8}} x^{2}+x^{3}+10 \,{\mathrm e}^{\frac {{\mathrm e}^{8}}{8}} x -10 x^{2}-18 \,{\mathrm e}^{\frac {{\mathrm e}^{8}}{8}}+43 x -90\right )\) | \(51\) |
norman | \(\left (-36 \,{\mathrm e}^{\frac {{\mathrm e}^{8}}{8}}-180\right ) x +\left (-4 \,{\mathrm e}^{\frac {{\mathrm e}^{8}}{8}}-20\right ) x^{3}+\left (2 \,{\mathrm e}^{\frac {{\mathrm e}^{8}}{4}}+20 \,{\mathrm e}^{\frac {{\mathrm e}^{8}}{8}}+86\right ) x^{2}+2 x^{4}\) | \(51\) |
risch | \(2 \,{\mathrm e}^{\frac {{\mathrm e}^{8}}{4}} x^{2}-4 \,{\mathrm e}^{\frac {{\mathrm e}^{8}}{8}} x^{3}+20 \,{\mathrm e}^{\frac {{\mathrm e}^{8}}{8}} x^{2}-36 \,{\mathrm e}^{\frac {{\mathrm e}^{8}}{8}} x +2 x^{4}-20 x^{3}+86 x^{2}-180 x\) | \(58\) |
parallelrisch | \(2 \,{\mathrm e}^{\frac {{\mathrm e}^{8}}{4}} x^{2}-4 \,{\mathrm e}^{\frac {{\mathrm e}^{8}}{8}} x^{3}+20 \,{\mathrm e}^{\frac {{\mathrm e}^{8}}{8}} x^{2}-36 \,{\mathrm e}^{\frac {{\mathrm e}^{8}}{8}} x +2 x^{4}-20 x^{3}+86 x^{2}-180 x\) | \(60\) |
parts | \(2 \,{\mathrm e}^{\frac {{\mathrm e}^{8}}{4}} x^{2}-4 \,{\mathrm e}^{\frac {{\mathrm e}^{8}}{8}} x^{3}+20 \,{\mathrm e}^{\frac {{\mathrm e}^{8}}{8}} x^{2}-36 \,{\mathrm e}^{\frac {{\mathrm e}^{8}}{8}} x +2 x^{4}-20 x^{3}+86 x^{2}-180 x\) | \(60\) |
[In]
[Out]
Leaf count of result is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. 48 vs. \(2 (18) = 36\).
Time = 0.24 (sec) , antiderivative size = 48, normalized size of antiderivative = 2.18 \[ \int \left (-180+172 x+4 e^{\frac {e^8}{4}} x-60 x^2+8 x^3+e^{\frac {e^8}{8}} \left (-36+40 x-12 x^2\right )\right ) \, dx=2 \, x^{4} - 20 \, x^{3} + 2 \, x^{2} e^{\left (\frac {1}{4} \, e^{8}\right )} + 86 \, x^{2} - 4 \, {\left (x^{3} - 5 \, x^{2} + 9 \, x\right )} e^{\left (\frac {1}{8} \, e^{8}\right )} - 180 \, x \]
[In]
[Out]
Leaf count of result is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. 54 vs. \(2 (15) = 30\).
Time = 0.03 (sec) , antiderivative size = 54, normalized size of antiderivative = 2.45 \[ \int \left (-180+172 x+4 e^{\frac {e^8}{4}} x-60 x^2+8 x^3+e^{\frac {e^8}{8}} \left (-36+40 x-12 x^2\right )\right ) \, dx=2 x^{4} + x^{3} \left (- 4 e^{\frac {e^{8}}{8}} - 20\right ) + x^{2} \cdot \left (86 + 20 e^{\frac {e^{8}}{8}} + 2 e^{\frac {e^{8}}{4}}\right ) + x \left (- 36 e^{\frac {e^{8}}{8}} - 180\right ) \]
[In]
[Out]
Leaf count of result is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. 48 vs. \(2 (18) = 36\).
Time = 0.18 (sec) , antiderivative size = 48, normalized size of antiderivative = 2.18 \[ \int \left (-180+172 x+4 e^{\frac {e^8}{4}} x-60 x^2+8 x^3+e^{\frac {e^8}{8}} \left (-36+40 x-12 x^2\right )\right ) \, dx=2 \, x^{4} - 20 \, x^{3} + 2 \, x^{2} e^{\left (\frac {1}{4} \, e^{8}\right )} + 86 \, x^{2} - 4 \, {\left (x^{3} - 5 \, x^{2} + 9 \, x\right )} e^{\left (\frac {1}{8} \, e^{8}\right )} - 180 \, x \]
[In]
[Out]
Leaf count of result is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. 48 vs. \(2 (18) = 36\).
Time = 0.28 (sec) , antiderivative size = 48, normalized size of antiderivative = 2.18 \[ \int \left (-180+172 x+4 e^{\frac {e^8}{4}} x-60 x^2+8 x^3+e^{\frac {e^8}{8}} \left (-36+40 x-12 x^2\right )\right ) \, dx=2 \, x^{4} - 20 \, x^{3} + 2 \, x^{2} e^{\left (\frac {1}{4} \, e^{8}\right )} + 86 \, x^{2} - 4 \, {\left (x^{3} - 5 \, x^{2} + 9 \, x\right )} e^{\left (\frac {1}{8} \, e^{8}\right )} - 180 \, x \]
[In]
[Out]
Time = 0.06 (sec) , antiderivative size = 52, normalized size of antiderivative = 2.36 \[ \int \left (-180+172 x+4 e^{\frac {e^8}{4}} x-60 x^2+8 x^3+e^{\frac {e^8}{8}} \left (-36+40 x-12 x^2\right )\right ) \, dx=2\,x^4+\left (-4\,{\mathrm {e}}^{\frac {{\mathrm {e}}^8}{8}}-20\right )\,x^3+\left (2\,{\mathrm {e}}^{\frac {{\mathrm {e}}^8}{4}}+20\,{\mathrm {e}}^{\frac {{\mathrm {e}}^8}{8}}+86\right )\,x^2+\left (-36\,{\mathrm {e}}^{\frac {{\mathrm {e}}^8}{8}}-180\right )\,x \]
[In]
[Out]