Integrand size = 13, antiderivative size = 14 \[ \int \frac {\tanh ^3(x)}{a+a \text {sech}(x)} \, dx=\frac {\log (\cosh (x))}{a}+\frac {\text {sech}(x)}{a} \]
[Out]
Time = 0.03 (sec) , antiderivative size = 14, normalized size of antiderivative = 1.00, number of steps used = 3, number of rules used = 2, \(\frac {\text {number of rules}}{\text {integrand size}}\) = 0.154, Rules used = {3964, 45} \[ \int \frac {\tanh ^3(x)}{a+a \text {sech}(x)} \, dx=\frac {\text {sech}(x)}{a}+\frac {\log (\cosh (x))}{a} \]
[In]
[Out]
Rule 45
Rule 3964
Rubi steps \begin{align*} \text {integral}& = -\frac {\text {Subst}\left (\int \frac {a-a x}{x^2} \, dx,x,\cosh (x)\right )}{a^2} \\ & = -\frac {\text {Subst}\left (\int \left (\frac {a}{x^2}-\frac {a}{x}\right ) \, dx,x,\cosh (x)\right )}{a^2} \\ & = \frac {\log (\cosh (x))}{a}+\frac {\text {sech}(x)}{a} \\ \end{align*}
Time = 0.04 (sec) , antiderivative size = 10, normalized size of antiderivative = 0.71 \[ \int \frac {\tanh ^3(x)}{a+a \text {sech}(x)} \, dx=\frac {\log (\cosh (x))+\text {sech}(x)}{a} \]
[In]
[Out]
Leaf count of result is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. \(33\) vs. \(2(14)=28\).
Time = 0.23 (sec) , antiderivative size = 34, normalized size of antiderivative = 2.43
method | result | size |
risch | \(-\frac {x}{a}+\frac {2 \,{\mathrm e}^{x}}{a \left (1+{\mathrm e}^{2 x}\right )}+\frac {\ln \left (1+{\mathrm e}^{2 x}\right )}{a}\) | \(34\) |
default | \(\frac {-\ln \left (\tanh \left (\frac {x}{2}\right )-1\right )-\ln \left (\tanh \left (\frac {x}{2}\right )+1\right )+\ln \left (1+\tanh \left (\frac {x}{2}\right )^{2}\right )+\frac {8}{4+4 \tanh \left (\frac {x}{2}\right )^{2}}}{a}\) | \(48\) |
[In]
[Out]
Leaf count of result is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. 85 vs. \(2 (14) = 28\).
Time = 0.25 (sec) , antiderivative size = 85, normalized size of antiderivative = 6.07 \[ \int \frac {\tanh ^3(x)}{a+a \text {sech}(x)} \, dx=-\frac {x \cosh \left (x\right )^{2} + x \sinh \left (x\right )^{2} - {\left (\cosh \left (x\right )^{2} + 2 \, \cosh \left (x\right ) \sinh \left (x\right ) + \sinh \left (x\right )^{2} + 1\right )} \log \left (\frac {2 \, \cosh \left (x\right )}{\cosh \left (x\right ) - \sinh \left (x\right )}\right ) + 2 \, {\left (x \cosh \left (x\right ) - 1\right )} \sinh \left (x\right ) + x - 2 \, \cosh \left (x\right )}{a \cosh \left (x\right )^{2} + 2 \, a \cosh \left (x\right ) \sinh \left (x\right ) + a \sinh \left (x\right )^{2} + a} \]
[In]
[Out]
\[ \int \frac {\tanh ^3(x)}{a+a \text {sech}(x)} \, dx=\frac {\int \frac {\tanh ^{3}{\left (x \right )}}{\operatorname {sech}{\left (x \right )} + 1}\, dx}{a} \]
[In]
[Out]
Leaf count of result is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. 33 vs. \(2 (14) = 28\).
Time = 0.27 (sec) , antiderivative size = 33, normalized size of antiderivative = 2.36 \[ \int \frac {\tanh ^3(x)}{a+a \text {sech}(x)} \, dx=\frac {x}{a} + \frac {2 \, e^{\left (-x\right )}}{a e^{\left (-2 \, x\right )} + a} + \frac {\log \left (e^{\left (-2 \, x\right )} + 1\right )}{a} \]
[In]
[Out]
Leaf count of result is larger than twice the leaf count of optimal. 35 vs. \(2 (14) = 28\).
Time = 0.29 (sec) , antiderivative size = 35, normalized size of antiderivative = 2.50 \[ \int \frac {\tanh ^3(x)}{a+a \text {sech}(x)} \, dx=\frac {\log \left (e^{\left (-x\right )} + e^{x}\right )}{a} - \frac {e^{\left (-x\right )} + e^{x} - 2}{a {\left (e^{\left (-x\right )} + e^{x}\right )}} \]
[In]
[Out]
Time = 2.10 (sec) , antiderivative size = 33, normalized size of antiderivative = 2.36 \[ \int \frac {\tanh ^3(x)}{a+a \text {sech}(x)} \, dx=\frac {\ln \left ({\mathrm {e}}^{2\,x}+1\right )}{a}-\frac {x}{a}+\frac {2\,{\mathrm {e}}^x}{a\,\left ({\mathrm {e}}^{2\,x}+1\right )} \]
[In]
[Out]