2.1.11 Problem 11

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm
Maple
Mathematica
Sympy

Internal problem ID [9181]
Book : Collection of Kovacic problems
Section : section 1
Problem number : 11
Date solved : Friday, April 25, 2025 at 05:59:13 PM
CAS classification : [[_2nd_order, _with_linear_symmetries]]

Solve

(x2+6x)y+(3x+9)y3y=0

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm

Time used: 0.329 (sec)

Writing the ode as

(1)(x2+6x)y+(3x+9)y3y=0(2)Ay+By+Cy=0

Comparing (1) and (2) shows that

A=x2+6x(3)B=3x+9C=3

Applying the Liouville transformation on the dependent variable gives

z(x)=yeB2Adx

Then (2) becomes

(4)z(x)=rz(x)

Where r is given by

(5)r=st=2AB2BA+B24AC4A2

Substituting the values of A,B,C from (3) in the above and simplifying gives

(6)r=15x2+90x274(x2+6x)2

Comparing the above to (5) shows that

s=15x2+90x27t=4(x2+6x)2

Therefore eq. (4) becomes

(7)z(x)=(15x2+90x274(x2+6x)2)z(x)

Equation (7) is now solved. After finding z(x) then y is found using the inverse transformation

y=z(x)eB2Adx

The first step is to determine the case of Kovacic algorithm this ode belongs to. There are 3 cases depending on the order of poles of r and the order of r at . The following table summarizes these cases.

Case

Allowed pole order for r

Allowed value for O()

1

{0,1,2,4,6,8,}

{,6,4,2,0,2,3,4,5,6,}

2

Need to have at least one pole that is either order 2 or odd order greater than 2. Any other pole order is allowed as long as the above condition is satisfied. Hence the following set of pole orders are all allowed. {1,2},{1,3},{2},{3},{3,4},{1,2,5}.

no condition

3

{1,2}

{2,3,4,5,6,7,}

Table 2.11: Necessary conditions for each Kovacic case

The order of r at is the degree of t minus the degree of s. Therefore

O()=deg(t)deg(s)=42=2

The poles of r in eq. (7) and the order of each pole are determined by solving for the roots of t=4(x2+6x)2. There is a pole at x=0 of order 2. There is a pole at x=6 of order 2. Since there is no odd order pole larger than 2 and the order at is 2 then the necessary conditions for case one are met. Since there is a pole of order 2 then necessary conditions for case two are met. Since pole order is not larger than 2 and the order at is 2 then the necessary conditions for case three are met. Therefore

L=[1,2,4,6,12]

Attempting to find a solution using case n=1.

Looking at poles of order 2. The partial fractions decomposition of r is

r=1116x316(x+6)21116(x+6)316x2

For the pole at x=6 let b be the coefficient of 1(x+6)2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=316. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=34αc=121+4b=14

For the pole at x=0 let b be the coefficient of 1x2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=316. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=34αc=121+4b=14

Since the order of r at is 2 then [r]=0. Let b be the coefficient of 1x2 in the Laurent series expansion of r at . which can be found by dividing the leading coefficient of s by the leading coefficient of t from

r=st=15x2+90x274(x2+6x)2

Since the gcd(s,t)=1. This gives b=154. Hence

[r]=0α+=12+1+4b=52α=121+4b=32

The following table summarizes the findings so far for poles and for the order of r at where r is

r=15x2+90x274(x2+6x)2

pole c location pole order [r]c αc+ αc
6 2 0 34 14
0 2 0 34 14

Order of r at [r] α+ α
2 0 52 32

Now that the all [r]c and its associated αc± have been determined for all the poles in the set Γ and [r] and its associated α± have also been found, the next step is to determine possible non negative integer d from these using

d=αs()cΓαcs(c)

Where s(c) is either + or and s() is the sign of α±. This is done by trial over all set of families s=(s(c))cΓ until such d is found to work in finding candidate ω. Trying α+=52 then

d=α+(αc1++αc2+)=52(32)=1

Since d an integer and d0 then it can be used to find ω using

ω=cΓ(s(c)[r]c+αcs(c)xc)+s()[r]

Substituting the above values in the above results in

ω=((+)[r]c1+αc1+xc1)+((+)[r]c2+αc2+xc2)+(+)[r]=34(x+6)+34x+(0)=34(x+6)+34x=3x2+92x(x+6)

Now that ω is determined, the next step is find a corresponding minimal polynomial p(x) of degree d=1 to solve the ode. The polynomial p(x) needs to satisfy the equation

(1A)p+2ωp+(ω+ω2r)p=0

Let

(2A)p(x)=x+a0

Substituting the above in eq. (1A) gives

(0)+2(34(x+6)+34x)(1)+((34(x+6)234x2)+(34(x+6)+34x)2(15x2+90x274(x2+6x)2))=093a0x(x+6)=0

Solving for the coefficients ai in the above using method of undetermined coefficients gives

{a0=3}

Substituting these coefficients in p(x) in eq. (2A) results in

p(x)=x+3

Therefore the first solution to the ode z=rz is

z1(x)=peωdx=(x+3)e(34(x+6)+34x)dx=(x+3)(x(x+6))3/4=(x+3)(x(x+6))3/4

The first solution to the original ode in y is found from

y1=z1e12BAdx=z1e123x+9x2+6xdx=z1e3ln(x(x+6))4=z1(1(x(x+6))3/4)

Which simplifies to

y1=x+3

The second solution y2 to the original ode is found using reduction of order

y2=y1eBAdxy12dx

Substituting gives

y2=y1e3x+9x2+6xdx(y1)2dx=y1e3ln(x(x+6))2(y1)2dx=y1(x(x+6)(2x2+12x+9)81(x+3)(x(x+6))3/2)

Therefore the solution is

y=c1y1+c2y2=c1(x+3)+c2(x+3(x(x+6)(2x2+12x+9)81(x+3)(x(x+6))3/2))

Will add steps showing solving for IC soon.

Maple. Time used: 0.017 (sec). Leaf size: 30
ode:=(x^2+6*x)*diff(diff(y(x),x),x)+(3*x+9)*diff(y(x),x)-3*y(x) = 0; 
dsolve(ode,y(x), singsol=all);
 
y=c1(x+3)+c2(2x2+12x+9)xx+6

Maple trace

Methods for second order ODEs: 
--- Trying classification methods --- 
trying a quadrature 
checking if the LODE has constant coefficients 
checking if the LODE is of Euler type 
trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)] 
checking if the LODE is missing y 
-> Trying a Liouvillian solution using Kovacics algorithm 
   A Liouvillian solution exists 
   Reducible group (found an exponential solution) 
   Reducible group (found another exponential solution) 
<- Kovacics algorithm successful
 

Maple step by step

Let’s solve(x2+6x)(ddxddxy(x))+(3x+9)(ddxy(x))3y(x)=0Highest derivative means the order of the ODE is2ddxddxy(x)Isolate 2nd derivativeddxddxy(x)=3y(x)x(x+6)3(x+3)(ddxy(x))x(x+6)Group terms withy(x)on the lhs of the ODE and the rest on the rhs of the ODE; ODE is linearddxddxy(x)+3(x+3)(ddxy(x))x(x+6)3y(x)x(x+6)=0Check to see ifx0is a regular singular pointDefine functions[P2(x)=3(x+3)x(x+6),P3(x)=3x(x+6)](x+6)P2(x)is analytic atx=6((x+6)P2(x))|x=6=32(x+6)2P3(x)is analytic atx=6((x+6)2P3(x))|x=6=0x=6is a regular singular pointCheck to see ifx0is a regular singular pointx0=6Multiply by denominatorsx(x+6)(ddxddxy(x))+(3x+9)(ddxy(x))3y(x)=0Change variables usingx=u6so that the regular singular point is atu=0(u26u)(ddudduy(u))+(3u9)(dduy(u))3y(u)=0Assume series solution fory(u)y(u)=k=0akuk+rRewrite ODE with series expansionsConvertum(dduy(u))to series expansion form=0..1um(dduy(u))=k=0ak(k+r)uk+r1+mShift index usingk>k+1mum(dduy(u))=k=1+mak+1m(k+1m+r)uk+rConvertum(ddudduy(u))to series expansion form=1..2um(ddudduy(u))=k=0ak(k+r)(k+r1)uk+r2+mShift index usingk>k+2mum(ddudduy(u))=k=2+mak+2m(k+2m+r)(k+1m+r)uk+rRewrite ODE with series expansions3a0r(1+2r)u1+r+(k=0(3ak+1(k+1+r)(2k+3+2r)+ak(k+r+3)(k+r1))uk+r)=0a0cannot be 0 by assumption, giving the indicial equation3r(1+2r)=0Values of r that satisfy the indicial equationr{0,12}Each term in the series must be 0, giving the recursion relation6(k+32+r)(k+1+r)ak+1+ak(k+r+3)(k+r1)=0Recursion relation that defines series solution to ODEak+1=ak(k+r+3)(k+r1)3(2k+3+2r)(k+1+r)Recursion relation forr=0; series terminates atk=1ak+1=ak(k+3)(k1)3(2k+3)(k+1)Apply recursion relation fork=0a1=a03Terminating series solution of the ODE forr=0. Use reduction of order to find the second linearly independent solutiony(u)=a0(1u3)Revert the change of variablesu=x+6[y(x)=a0(1x3)]Recursion relation forr=12ak+1=ak(k+52)(k32)3(2k+2)(k+12)Solution forr=12[y(u)=k=0akuk12,ak+1=ak(k+52)(k32)3(2k+2)(k+12)]Revert the change of variablesu=x+6[y(x)=k=0ak(x+6)k12,ak+1=ak(k+52)(k32)3(2k+2)(k+12)]Combine solutions and rename parameters[y(x)=a0(1x3)+(k=0bk(x+6)k12),bk+1=bk(k+52)(k32)3(2k+2)(k+12)]
Mathematica. Time used: 0.675 (sec). Leaf size: 103
ode=(x^2+6*x)*D[y[x],{x,2}]+(3*x+9)*D[y[x],x]-3*y[x]==0; 
ic={}; 
DSolve[{ode,ic},y[x],x,IncludeSingularSolutions->True]
 
y(x)(9πc2x(x+6)4Q3212(x3+1)+6c1(2x2+12x+9))exp(1xK[1]+32K[1](K[1]+6)dK[1])9πx(x+6)4
Sympy
from sympy import * 
x = symbols("x") 
y = Function("y") 
ode = Eq((3*x + 9)*Derivative(y(x), x) + (x**2 + 6*x)*Derivative(y(x), (x, 2)) - 3*y(x),0) 
ics = {} 
dsolve(ode,func=y(x),ics=ics)
 
False