2.1.278 Problem 281

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm
Maple
Mathematica
Sympy

Internal problem ID [9450]
Book : Collection of Kovacic problems
Section : section 1
Problem number : 281
Date solved : Sunday, March 30, 2025 at 02:35:13 PM
CAS classification : [[_2nd_order, _with_linear_symmetries]]

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm

Time used: 0.445 (sec)

Writing the ode as

(1)y+(n26x2)y=0(2)Ay+By+Cy=0

Comparing (1) and (2) shows that

A=1(3)B=0C=n26x2

Applying the Liouville transformation on the dependent variable gives

z(x)=yeB2Adx

Then (2) becomes

(4)z(x)=rz(x)

Where r is given by

(5)r=st=2AB2BA+B24AC4A2

Substituting the values of A,B,C from (3) in the above and simplifying gives

(6)r=n2x2+6x2

Comparing the above to (5) shows that

s=n2x2+6t=x2

Therefore eq. (4) becomes

(7)z(x)=(n2x2+6x2)z(x)

Equation (7) is now solved. After finding z(x) then y is found using the inverse transformation

y=z(x)eB2Adx

The first step is to determine the case of Kovacic algorithm this ode belongs to. There are 3 cases depending on the order of poles of r and the order of r at . The following table summarizes these cases.

Case

Allowed pole order for r

Allowed value for O()

1

{0,1,2,4,6,8,}

{,6,4,2,0,2,3,4,5,6,}

2

Need to have at least one pole that is either order 2 or odd order greater than 2. Any other pole order is allowed as long as the above condition is satisfied. Hence the following set of pole orders are all allowed. {1,2},{1,3},{2},{3},{3,4},{1,2,5}.

no condition

3

{1,2}

{2,3,4,5,6,7,}

Table 2.278: Necessary conditions for each Kovacic case

The order of r at is the degree of t minus the degree of s. Therefore

O()=deg(t)deg(s)=22=0

The poles of r in eq. (7) and the order of each pole are determined by solving for the roots of t=x2. There is a pole at x=0 of order 2. Since there is no odd order pole larger than 2 and the order at is 0 then the necessary conditions for case one are met. Since there is a pole of order 2 then necessary conditions for case two are met. Therefore

L=[1,2]

Attempting to find a solution using case n=1.

Looking at poles of order 2. The partial fractions decomposition of r is

r=n2+6x2

For the pole at x=0 let b be the coefficient of 1x2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=6. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=3αc=121+4b=2

Since the order of r at is Or()=0 then

v=Or()2=02=0

[r] is the sum of terms involving xi for 0iv in the Laurent series for r at . Therefore

[r]=i=0vaixi(8)=i=00aixi

Let a be the coefficient of xv=x0 in the above sum. The Laurent series of r at is

(9)rin3inx29i2n3x427i2n5x6405i8n7x81701i8n9x1015309i16n11x1272171i16n13x14+

Comparing Eq. (9) with Eq. (8) shows that

a=in

From Eq. (9) the sum up to v=0 gives

[r]=i=00aixi(10)=in

Now we need to find b, where b be the coefficient of xv1=x1=1x in r minus the coefficient of same term but in ([r])2 where [r] was found above in Eq (10). Hence

([r])2=n2

This shows that the coefficient of 1x in the above is 0. Now we need to find the coefficient of 1x in r. How this is done depends on if v=0 or not. Since v=0 then starting from r=st and doing long division in the form

r=Q+Rt

Where Q is the quotient and R is the remainder. Then the coefficient of 1x in r will be the coefficient in R of the term in x of degree of t minus one, divided by the leading coefficient in t. Doing long division gives

r=st=n2x2+6x2=Q+Rx2=(n2)+(6x2)=n2+6x2

Since the degree of t is 2, then we see that the coefficient of the term x in the remainder R is 0. Dividing this by leading coefficient in t which is 1 gives 0. Now b can be found.

b=(0)(0)=0

Hence

[r]=inα+=12(bav)=12(0in0)=0α=12(bav)=12(0in0)=0

The following table summarizes the findings so far for poles and for the order of r at where r is

r=n2x2+6x2

pole c location pole order [r]c αc+ αc
0 2 0 3 2

Order of r at [r] α+ α
0 in 0 0

Now that the all [r]c and its associated αc± have been determined for all the poles in the set Γ and [r] and its associated α± have also been found, the next step is to determine possible non negative integer d from these using

d=αs()cΓαcs(c)

Where s(c) is either + or and s() is the sign of α±. This is done by trial over all set of families s=(s(c))cΓ until such d is found to work in finding candidate ω. Trying α=0 then

d=α(αc1)=0(2)=2

Since d an integer and d0 then it can be used to find ω using

ω=cΓ(s(c)[r]c+αcs(c)xc)+s()[r]

The above gives

ω=(()[r]c1+αc1xc1)+()[r]=2x+()(in)=2xin=2xin

Now that ω is determined, the next step is find a corresponding minimal polynomial p(x) of degree d=2 to solve the ode. The polynomial p(x) needs to satisfy the equation

(1A)p+2ωp+(ω+ω2r)p=0

Let

(2A)p(x)=x2+xa1+a0

Substituting the above in eq. (1A) gives

(2)+2(2xin)(2x+a1)+((2x2)+(2xin)2(n2x2+6x2))=0(2ina16)x+4ina04a1x=0

Solving for the coefficients ai in the above using method of undetermined coefficients gives

{a0=3n2,a1=3in}

Substituting these coefficients in p(x) in eq. (2A) results in

p(x)=x23ixn3n2

Therefore the first solution to the ode z=rz is

z1(x)=peωdx=(x23ixn3n2)e(2xin)dx=(x23ixn3n2)e2ln(x)inx=(n2x23inx3)einxx2n2

The first solution to the original ode in y is found from

y1=z1e12BAdx

Since B=0 then the above reduces to

y1=z1=(n2x23inx3)einxx2n2

Which simplifies to

y1=(n2x23inx3)einxx2n2

The second solution y2 to the original ode is found using reduction of order

y2=y1eBAdxy12dx

Since B=0 then the above becomes

y2=y11y12dx=(n2x23inx3)einxx2n21(n2x23inx3)2e2inxx4n4dx=(n2x23inx3)einxx2n2((in2x23nx3i)e2inx2n(n2x2+3inx+3))

Therefore the solution is

y=c1y1+c2y2=c1((n2x23inx3)einxx2n2)+c2((n2x23inx3)einxx2n2((in2x23nx3i)e2inx2n(n2x2+3inx+3)))

Will add steps showing solving for IC soon.

Maple. Time used: 0.013 (sec). Leaf size: 53
ode:=diff(diff(y(x),x),x)+n^2*y(x) = 6/x^2*y(x); 
dsolve(ode,y(x), singsol=all);
 
y=(c1n2x2+3c2nx3c1)cos(nx)+sin(nx)(c2n2x23c1nx3c2)x2

Maple trace

Methods for second order ODEs: 
--- Trying classification methods --- 
trying a quadrature 
checking if the LODE has constant coefficients 
checking if the LODE is of Euler type 
trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)] 
checking if the LODE is missing y 
-> Trying a Liouvillian solution using Kovacics algorithm 
   A Liouvillian solution exists 
   Group is reducible or imprimitive 
<- Kovacics algorithm successful
 

Maple step by step

Let’s solveddxddxy(x)+n2y(x)=6y(x)x2Highest derivative means the order of the ODE is2ddxddxy(x)Isolate 2nd derivativeddxddxy(x)=(n2x26)y(x)x2Group terms withy(x)on the lhs of the ODE and the rest on the rhs of the ODE; ODE is linearddxddxy(x)+(n2x26)y(x)x2=0Check to see ifx0=0is a regular singular pointDefine functions[P2(x)=0,P3(x)=n2x26x2]xP2(x)is analytic atx=0(xP2(x))|x=0=0x2P3(x)is analytic atx=0(x2P3(x))|x=0=6x=0is a regular singular pointCheck to see ifx0=0is a regular singular pointx0=0Multiply by denominators(ddxddxy(x))x2+(n2x26)y(x)=0Assume series solution fory(x)y(x)=k=0akxk+rRewrite ODE with series expansionsConvertxmy(x)to series expansion form=0..2xmy(x)=k=0akxk+r+mShift index usingk>kmxmy(x)=k=makmxk+rConvertx2(ddxddxy(x))to series expansionx2(ddxddxy(x))=k=0ak(k+r)(k+r1)xk+rRewrite ODE with series expansionsa0(2+r)(3+r)xr+a1(3+r)(2+r)x1+r+(k=2(ak(k+r+2)(k+r3)+ak2n2)xk+r)=0a0cannot be 0 by assumption, giving the indicial equation(2+r)(3+r)=0Values of r that satisfy the indicial equationr{2,3}Each term must be 0a1(3+r)(2+r)=0Solve for the dependent coefficient(s)a1=0Each term in the series must be 0, giving the recursion relationak(k+r+2)(k+r3)+ak2n2=0Shift index usingk>k+2ak+2(k+4+r)(k+r1)+akn2=0Recursion relation that defines series solution to ODEak+2=akn2(k+4+r)(k+r1)Recursion relation forr=2ak+2=akn2(k+2)(k3)Solution forr=2[y(x)=k=0akxk2,ak+2=akn2(k+2)(k3),a1=0]Recursion relation forr=3ak+2=akn2(k+7)(k+2)Solution forr=3[y(x)=k=0akxk+3,ak+2=akn2(k+7)(k+2),a1=0]Combine solutions and rename parameters[y(x)=(k=0akxk2)+(k=0bkxk+3),ak+2=akn2(k+2)(k3),a1=0,bk+2=bkn2(k+7)(k+2),b1=0]
Mathematica. Time used: 0.123 (sec). Leaf size: 79
ode=D[y[x],{x,2}]+n^2*y[x]==6*y[x]/x^2; 
ic={}; 
DSolve[{ode,ic},y[x],x,IncludeSingularSolutions->True]
 
y(x)2πx((c2(n2)x2+3c1nx+3c2)cos(nx)+(c1(n2x23)+3c2nx)sin(nx))(nx)5/2
Sympy. Time used: 0.095 (sec). Leaf size: 24
from sympy import * 
x = symbols("x") 
n = symbols("n") 
y = Function("y") 
ode = Eq(n**2*y(x) + Derivative(y(x), (x, 2)) - 6*y(x)/x**2,0) 
ics = {} 
dsolve(ode,func=y(x),ics=ics)
 
y(x)=x(C1J52(nx)+C2Y52(nx))