2.1.314 Problem 319

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm
Maple
Mathematica
Sympy

Internal problem ID [9484]
Book : Collection of Kovacic problems
Section : section 1
Problem number : 319
Date solved : Friday, April 25, 2025 at 06:09:30 PM
CAS classification : [[_2nd_order, _with_linear_symmetries]]

Solve

(x+2)y+xyy=0

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm

Time used: 0.354 (sec)

Writing the ode as

(1)(x+2)y+xyy=0(2)Ay+By+Cy=0

Comparing (1) and (2) shows that

A=x+2(3)B=xC=1

Applying the Liouville transformation on the dependent variable gives

z(x)=yeB2Adx

Then (2) becomes

(4)z(x)=rz(x)

Where r is given by

(5)r=st=2AB2BA+B24AC4A2

Substituting the values of A,B,C from (3) in the above and simplifying gives

(6)r=x2+4x+124(x+2)2

Comparing the above to (5) shows that

s=x2+4x+12t=4(x+2)2

Therefore eq. (4) becomes

(7)z(x)=(x2+4x+124(x+2)2)z(x)

Equation (7) is now solved. After finding z(x) then y is found using the inverse transformation

y=z(x)eB2Adx

The first step is to determine the case of Kovacic algorithm this ode belongs to. There are 3 cases depending on the order of poles of r and the order of r at . The following table summarizes these cases.

Case

Allowed pole order for r

Allowed value for O()

1

{0,1,2,4,6,8,}

{,6,4,2,0,2,3,4,5,6,}

2

Need to have at least one pole that is either order 2 or odd order greater than 2. Any other pole order is allowed as long as the above condition is satisfied. Hence the following set of pole orders are all allowed. {1,2},{1,3},{2},{3},{3,4},{1,2,5}.

no condition

3

{1,2}

{2,3,4,5,6,7,}

Table 2.314: Necessary conditions for each Kovacic case

The order of r at is the degree of t minus the degree of s. Therefore

O()=deg(t)deg(s)=22=0

The poles of r in eq. (7) and the order of each pole are determined by solving for the roots of t=4(x+2)2. There is a pole at x=2 of order 2. Since there is no odd order pole larger than 2 and the order at is 0 then the necessary conditions for case one are met. Since there is a pole of order 2 then necessary conditions for case two are met. Therefore

L=[1,2]

Attempting to find a solution using case n=1.

Looking at poles of order 2. The partial fractions decomposition of r is

r=14+2(x+2)2

For the pole at x=2 let b be the coefficient of 1(x+2)2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=2. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=2αc=121+4b=1

Since the order of r at is Or()=0 then

v=Or()2=02=0

[r] is the sum of terms involving xi for 0iv in the Laurent series for r at . Therefore

[r]=i=0vaixi(8)=i=00aixi

Let a be the coefficient of xv=x0 in the above sum. The Laurent series of r at is

(9)r12+2x28x3+20x432x5+16x6+64x780x8+

Comparing Eq. (9) with Eq. (8) shows that

a=12

From Eq. (9) the sum up to v=0 gives

[r]=i=00aixi(10)=12

Now we need to find b, where b be the coefficient of xv1=x1=1x in r minus the coefficient of same term but in ([r])2 where [r] was found above in Eq (10). Hence

([r])2=14

This shows that the coefficient of 1x in the above is 0. Now we need to find the coefficient of 1x in r. How this is done depends on if v=0 or not. Since v=0 then starting from r=st and doing long division in the form

r=Q+Rt

Where Q is the quotient and R is the remainder. Then the coefficient of 1x in r will be the coefficient in R of the term in x of degree of t minus one, divided by the leading coefficient in t. Doing long division gives

r=st=x2+4x+124x2+16x+16=Q+R4x2+16x+16=(14)+(84x2+16x+16)=14+84x2+16x+16

Since the degree of t is 2, then we see that the coefficient of the term x in the remainder R is 0. Dividing this by leading coefficient in t which is 4 gives 0. Now b can be found.

b=(0)(0)=0

Hence

[r]=12α+=12(bav)=12(0120)=0α=12(bav)=12(0120)=0

The following table summarizes the findings so far for poles and for the order of r at where r is

r=x2+4x+124(x+2)2

pole c location pole order [r]c αc+ αc
2 2 0 2 1

Order of r at [r] α+ α
0 12 0 0

Now that the all [r]c and its associated αc± have been determined for all the poles in the set Γ and [r] and its associated α± have also been found, the next step is to determine possible non negative integer d from these using

d=αs()cΓαcs(c)

Where s(c) is either + or and s() is the sign of α±. This is done by trial over all set of families s=(s(c))cΓ until such d is found to work in finding candidate ω. Trying α=0 then

d=α(αc1)=0(1)=1

Since d an integer and d0 then it can be used to find ω using

ω=cΓ(s(c)[r]c+αcs(c)xc)+s()[r]

The above gives

ω=(()[r]c1+αc1xc1)+()[r]=1x+2+()(12)=1x+212=4+x2(x+2)

Now that ω is determined, the next step is find a corresponding minimal polynomial p(x) of degree d=1 to solve the ode. The polynomial p(x) needs to satisfy the equation

(1A)p+2ωp+(ω+ω2r)p=0

Let

(2A)p(x)=x+a0

Substituting the above in eq. (1A) gives

(0)+2(1x+212)(1)+((1(x+2)2)+(1x+212)2(x2+4x+124(x+2)2))=0a04x+2=0

Solving for the coefficients ai in the above using method of undetermined coefficients gives

{a0=4}

Substituting these coefficients in p(x) in eq. (2A) results in

p(x)=4+x

Therefore the first solution to the ode z=rz is

z1(x)=peωdx=(4+x)e(1x+212)dx=(4+x)ex2ln(x+2)=(4+x)ex2x+2

The first solution to the original ode in y is found from

y1=z1e12BAdx=z1e12xx+2dx=z1ex2+ln(x+2)=z1((x+2)ex2)

Which simplifies to

y1=ex(4+x)

The second solution y2 to the original ode is found using reduction of order

y2=y1eBAdxy12dx

Substituting gives

y2=y1exx+2dx(y1)2dx=y1ex+2ln(x+2)(y1)2dx=y1(xex+2ln(x+2)e2x(4+x)(x+2)2)

Therefore the solution is

y=c1y1+c2y2=c1(ex(4+x))+c2(ex(4+x)(xex+2ln(x+2)e2x(4+x)(x+2)2))

Will add steps showing solving for IC soon.

Maple. Time used: 0.003 (sec). Leaf size: 17
ode:=(x+2)*diff(diff(y(x),x),x)+x*diff(y(x),x)-y(x) = 0; 
dsolve(ode,y(x), singsol=all);
 
y=c1x+c2ex(x+4)

Maple trace

Methods for second order ODEs: 
--- Trying classification methods --- 
trying a quadrature 
checking if the LODE has constant coefficients 
checking if the LODE is of Euler type 
trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)] 
checking if the LODE is missing y 
-> Trying a Liouvillian solution using Kovacics algorithm 
   A Liouvillian solution exists 
   Reducible group (found an exponential solution) 
   Reducible group (found another exponential solution) 
<- Kovacics algorithm successful
 

Maple step by step

Let’s solve(x+2)(ddxddxy(x))+x(ddxy(x))y(x)=0Highest derivative means the order of the ODE is2ddxddxy(x)Isolate 2nd derivativeddxddxy(x)=y(x)x+2x(ddxy(x))x+2Group terms withy(x)on the lhs of the ODE and the rest on the rhs of the ODE; ODE is linearddxddxy(x)+x(ddxy(x))x+2y(x)x+2=0Check to see ifx0=2is a regular singular pointDefine functions[P2(x)=xx+2,P3(x)=1x+2](x+2)P2(x)is analytic atx=2((x+2)P2(x))|x=2=2(x+2)2P3(x)is analytic atx=2((x+2)2P3(x))|x=2=0x=2is a regular singular pointCheck to see ifx0=2is a regular singular pointx0=2Multiply by denominators(x+2)(ddxddxy(x))+x(ddxy(x))y(x)=0Change variables usingx=u2so that the regular singular point is atu=0u(ddudduy(u))+(u2)(dduy(u))y(u)=0Assume series solution fory(u)y(u)=k=0akuk+rRewrite ODE with series expansionsConvertum(dduy(u))to series expansion form=0..1um(dduy(u))=k=0ak(k+r)uk+r1+mShift index usingk>k+1mum(dduy(u))=k=1+mak+1m(k+1m+r)uk+rConvertu(ddudduy(u))to series expansionu(ddudduy(u))=k=0ak(k+r)(k+r1)uk+r1Shift index usingk>k+1u(ddudduy(u))=k=1ak+1(k+1+r)(k+r)uk+rRewrite ODE with series expansionsa0r(3+r)u1+r+(k=0(ak+1(k+1+r)(k2+r)+ak(k+r1))uk+r)=0a0cannot be 0 by assumption, giving the indicial equationr(3+r)=0Values of r that satisfy the indicial equationr{0,3}Each term in the series must be 0, giving the recursion relationak+1(k+1+r)(k2+r)+ak(k+r1)=0Recursion relation that defines series solution to ODEak+1=ak(k+r1)(k+1+r)(k2+r)Recursion relation forr=0; series terminates atk=1ak+1=ak(k1)(k+1)(k2)Apply recursion relation fork=0a1=a02Terminating series solution of the ODE forr=0. Use reduction of order to find the second linearly independent solutiony(u)=a0(1u2)Revert the change of variablesu=x+2[y(x)=a0x2]Recursion relation forr=3ak+1=ak(k+2)(k+4)(k+1)Solution forr=3[y(u)=k=0akuk+3,ak+1=ak(k+2)(k+4)(k+1)]Revert the change of variablesu=x+2[y(x)=k=0ak(x+2)k+3,ak+1=ak(k+2)(k+4)(k+1)]Combine solutions and rename parameters[y(x)=a0x2+(k=0bk(x+2)k+3),bk+1=bk(k+2)(k+4)(k+1)]
Mathematica. Time used: 0.341 (sec). Leaf size: 96
ode=(x+2)*D[y[x],{x,2}]+x*D[y[x],x]-y[x]==0; 
ic={}; 
DSolve[{ode,ic},y[x],x,IncludeSingularSolutions->True]
 
y(x)2i((c1(x+2)+2ic2)cosh(x+22)(ic2(x+2)+2c1)sinh(x+22))exp(1x1K[1]2K[1]+4dK[1])π(i(x+2))3/2
Sympy
from sympy import * 
x = symbols("x") 
y = Function("y") 
ode = Eq(x*Derivative(y(x), x) + (x + 2)*Derivative(y(x), (x, 2)) - y(x),0) 
ics = {} 
dsolve(ode,func=y(x),ics=ics)
 
False