2.1.536 Problem 552

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm
Maple
Mathematica
Sympy

Internal problem ID [9708]
Book : Collection of Kovacic problems
Section : section 1
Problem number : 552
Date solved : Sunday, March 30, 2025 at 02:44:51 PM
CAS classification : [[_2nd_order, _with_linear_symmetries]]

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm

Time used: 0.183 (sec)

Writing the ode as

(1)(84x3+28x2)y+(63x235x)y+(63x+14)y=0(2)Ay+By+Cy=0

Comparing (1) and (2) shows that

A=84x3+28x2(3)B=63x235xC=63x+14

Applying the Liouville transformation on the dependent variable gives

z(x)=yeB2Adx

Then (2) becomes

(4)z(x)=rz(x)

Where r is given by

(5)r=st=2AB2BA+B24AC4A2

Substituting the values of A,B,C from (3) in the above and simplifying gives

(6)r=3364x2

Comparing the above to (5) shows that

s=33t=64x2

Therefore eq. (4) becomes

(7)z(x)=(3364x2)z(x)

Equation (7) is now solved. After finding z(x) then y is found using the inverse transformation

y=z(x)eB2Adx

The first step is to determine the case of Kovacic algorithm this ode belongs to. There are 3 cases depending on the order of poles of r and the order of r at . The following table summarizes these cases.

Case

Allowed pole order for r

Allowed value for O()

1

{0,1,2,4,6,8,}

{,6,4,2,0,2,3,4,5,6,}

2

Need to have at least one pole that is either order 2 or odd order greater than 2. Any other pole order is allowed as long as the above condition is satisfied. Hence the following set of pole orders are all allowed. {1,2},{1,3},{2},{3},{3,4},{1,2,5}.

no condition

3

{1,2}

{2,3,4,5,6,7,}

Table 2.536: Necessary conditions for each Kovacic case

The order of r at is the degree of t minus the degree of s. Therefore

O()=deg(t)deg(s)=20=2

The poles of r in eq. (7) and the order of each pole are determined by solving for the roots of t=64x2. There is a pole at x=0 of order 2. Since there is no odd order pole larger than 2 and the order at is 2 then the necessary conditions for case one are met. Since there is a pole of order 2 then necessary conditions for case two are met. Since pole order is not larger than 2 and the order at is 2 then the necessary conditions for case three are met. Therefore

L=[1,2,4,6,12]

Attempting to find a solution using case n=1.

Looking at poles of order 2. The partial fractions decomposition of r is

r=3364x2

For the pole at x=0 let b be the coefficient of 1x2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=3364. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=118αc=121+4b=38

Since the order of r at is 2 then [r]=0. Let b be the coefficient of 1x2 in the Laurent series expansion of r at . which can be found by dividing the leading coefficient of s by the leading coefficient of t from

r=st=3364x2

Since the gcd(s,t)=1. This gives b=3364. Hence

[r]=0α+=12+1+4b=118α=121+4b=38

The following table summarizes the findings so far for poles and for the order of r at where r is

r=3364x2

pole c location pole order [r]c αc+ αc
0 2 0 118 38

Order of r at [r] α+ α
2 0 118 38

Now that the all [r]c and its associated αc± have been determined for all the poles in the set Γ and [r] and its associated α± have also been found, the next step is to determine possible non negative integer d from these using

d=αs()cΓαcs(c)

Where s(c) is either + or and s() is the sign of α±. This is done by trial over all set of families s=(s(c))cΓ until such d is found to work in finding candidate ω. Trying α=38 then

d=α(αc1)=38(38)=0

Since d an integer and d0 then it can be used to find ω using

ω=cΓ(s(c)[r]c+αcs(c)xc)+s()[r]

The above gives

ω=(()[r]c1+αc1xc1)+()[r]=38x+()(0)=38x=38x

Now that ω is determined, the next step is find a corresponding minimal polynomial p(x) of degree d=0 to solve the ode. The polynomial p(x) needs to satisfy the equation

(1A)p+2ωp+(ω+ω2r)p=0

Let

(2A)p(x)=1

Substituting the above in eq. (1A) gives

(0)+2(38x)(0)+((38x2)+(38x)2(3364x2))=00=0

The equation is satisfied since both sides are zero. Therefore the first solution to the ode z=rz is

z1(x)=peωdx=e38xdx=1x3/8

The first solution to the original ode in y is found from

y1=z1e12BAdx=z1e1263x235x84x3+28x2dx=z1e5ln(x)8ln(1+3x)=z1(x5/81+3x)

Which simplifies to

y1=x1/41+3x

The second solution y2 to the original ode is found using reduction of order

y2=y1eBAdxy12dx

Substituting gives

y2=y1e63x235x84x3+28x2dx(y1)2dx=y1e5ln(x)42ln(1+3x)(y1)2dx=y1(4xe5ln(x)42ln(1+3x)(1+3x)27)

Therefore the solution is

y=c1y1+c2y2=c1(x1/41+3x)+c2(x1/41+3x(4xe5ln(x)42ln(1+3x)(1+3x)27))

Will add steps showing solving for IC soon.

Maple. Time used: 0.012 (sec). Leaf size: 23
ode:=28*x^2*(1-3*x)*diff(diff(y(x),x),x)-7*x*(5+9*x)*diff(y(x),x)+7*(2+9*x)*y(x) = 0; 
dsolve(ode,y(x), singsol=all);
 
y=c1x2+c2x1/41+3x

Maple trace

Methods for second order ODEs: 
--- Trying classification methods --- 
trying a quadrature 
checking if the LODE has constant coefficients 
checking if the LODE is of Euler type 
trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)] 
checking if the LODE is missing y 
-> Trying a Liouvillian solution using Kovacics algorithm 
   A Liouvillian solution exists 
   Reducible group (found an exponential solution) 
   Reducible group (found another exponential solution) 
<- Kovacics algorithm successful
 

Maple step by step

Let’s solve28x2(13x)(ddxddxy(x))7x(5+9x)(ddxy(x))+7(2+9x)y(x)=0Highest derivative means the order of the ODE is2ddxddxy(x)Isolate 2nd derivativeddxddxy(x)=(2+9x)y(x)4x2(1+3x)(5+9x)(ddxy(x))4x(1+3x)Group terms withy(x)on the lhs of the ODE and the rest on the rhs of the ODE; ODE is linearddxddxy(x)+(5+9x)(ddxy(x))4x(1+3x)(2+9x)y(x)4x2(1+3x)=0Check to see ifx0is a regular singular pointDefine functions[P2(x)=5+9x4x(1+3x),P3(x)=2+9x4x2(1+3x)]xP2(x)is analytic atx=0(xP2(x))|x=0=54x2P3(x)is analytic atx=0(x2P3(x))|x=0=12x=0is a regular singular pointCheck to see ifx0is a regular singular pointx0=0Multiply by denominators4x2(1+3x)(ddxddxy(x))+x(5+9x)(ddxy(x))+(9x2)y(x)=0Assume series solution fory(x)y(x)=k=0akxk+rRewrite ODE with series expansionsConvertxmy(x)to series expansion form=0..1xmy(x)=k=0akxk+r+mShift index usingk>kmxmy(x)=k=makmxk+rConvertxm(ddxy(x))to series expansion form=1..2xm(ddxy(x))=k=0ak(k+r)xk+r1+mShift index usingk>k+1mxm(ddxy(x))=k=1+mak+1m(k+1m+r)xk+rConvertxm(ddxddxy(x))to series expansion form=2..3xm(ddxddxy(x))=k=0ak(k+r)(k+r1)xk+r2+mShift index usingk>k+2mxm(ddxddxy(x))=k=2+mak+2m(k+2m+r)(k+1m+r)xk+rRewrite ODE with series expansionsa0(1+4r)(2+r)xr+(k=1(ak(4k+4r1)(k+r2)+3ak1(4k+4r1)(k+r2))xk+r)=0a0cannot be 0 by assumption, giving the indicial equation(1+4r)(2+r)=0Values of r that satisfy the indicial equationr{2,14}Each term in the series must be 0, giving the recursion relation4(ak3ak1)(k+r14)(k+r2)=0Shift index usingk>k+14(ak+13ak)(k+34+r)(k+r1)=0Recursion relation that defines series solution to ODEak+1=3akRecursion relation forr=2ak+1=3akSolution forr=2[y(x)=k=0akxk+2,ak+1=3ak]Recursion relation forr=14ak+1=3akSolution forr=14[y(x)=k=0akxk+14,ak+1=3ak]Combine solutions and rename parameters[y(x)=(k=0akxk+2)+(k=0bkxk+14),ak+1=3ak,bk+1=3bk]
Mathematica. Time used: 0.278 (sec). Leaf size: 60
ode=28*x^2*(1-3*x)*D[y[x],{x,2}]-7*x*(5+9*x)*D[y[x],x]+7*(2+9*x)*y[x]==0; 
ic={}; 
DSolve[{ode,ic},y[x],x,IncludeSingularSolutions->True]
 
y(x)(4c2x7/4+7c1)exp(121x(63K[1]154K[1])dK[1])7x3/8
Sympy
from sympy import * 
x = symbols("x") 
y = Function("y") 
ode = Eq(28*x**2*(1 - 3*x)*Derivative(y(x), (x, 2)) - 7*x*(9*x + 5)*Derivative(y(x), x) + (63*x + 14)*y(x),0) 
ics = {} 
dsolve(ode,func=y(x),ics=ics)
 
False