2.1.54 Problem 56

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm
Maple
Mathematica
Sympy

Internal problem ID [9226]
Book : Collection of Kovacic problems
Section : section 1
Problem number : 56
Date solved : Sunday, March 30, 2025 at 02:26:00 PM
CAS classification : [[_2nd_order, _with_linear_symmetries]]

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm

Time used: 0.519 (sec)

Writing the ode as

(1)(2x2+1)y+7xy+2y=0(2)Ay+By+Cy=0

Comparing (1) and (2) shows that

A=2x2+1(3)B=7xC=2

Applying the Liouville transformation on the dependent variable gives

z(x)=yeB2Adx

Then (2) becomes

(4)z(x)=rz(x)

Where r is given by

(5)r=st=2AB2BA+B24AC4A2

Substituting the values of A,B,C from (3) in the above and simplifying gives

(6)r=5x2+64(2x2+1)2

Comparing the above to (5) shows that

s=5x2+6t=4(2x2+1)2

Therefore eq. (4) becomes

(7)z(x)=(5x2+64(2x2+1)2)z(x)

Equation (7) is now solved. After finding z(x) then y is found using the inverse transformation

y=z(x)eB2Adx

The first step is to determine the case of Kovacic algorithm this ode belongs to. There are 3 cases depending on the order of poles of r and the order of r at . The following table summarizes these cases.

Case

Allowed pole order for r

Allowed value for O()

1

{0,1,2,4,6,8,}

{,6,4,2,0,2,3,4,5,6,}

2

Need to have at least one pole that is either order 2 or odd order greater than 2. Any other pole order is allowed as long as the above condition is satisfied. Hence the following set of pole orders are all allowed. {1,2},{1,3},{2},{3},{3,4},{1,2,5}.

no condition

3

{1,2}

{2,3,4,5,6,7,}

Table 2.54: Necessary conditions for each Kovacic case

The order of r at is the degree of t minus the degree of s. Therefore

O()=deg(t)deg(s)=42=2

The poles of r in eq. (7) and the order of each pole are determined by solving for the roots of t=4(2x2+1)2. There is a pole at x=i22 of order 2. There is a pole at x=i22 of order 2. Since there is no odd order pole larger than 2 and the order at is 2 then the necessary conditions for case one are met. Since there is a pole of order 2 then necessary conditions for case two are met. Since pole order is not larger than 2 and the order at is 2 then the necessary conditions for case three are met. Therefore

L=[1,2,4,6,12]

Attempting to find a solution using case n=1.

Looking at poles of order 2. The partial fractions decomposition of r is

r=764(xi22)2764(x+i22)217i264(xi22)+17i264(x+i22)

For the pole at x=i22 let b be the coefficient of 1(xi22)2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=764. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=78αc=121+4b=18

For the pole at x=i22 let b be the coefficient of 1(x+i22)2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=764. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=78αc=121+4b=18

Since the order of r at is 2 then [r]=0. Let b be the coefficient of 1x2 in the Laurent series expansion of r at . which can be found by dividing the leading coefficient of s by the leading coefficient of t from

r=st=5x2+64(2x2+1)2

Since the gcd(s,t)=1. This gives b=516. Hence

[r]=0α+=12+1+4b=54α=121+4b=14

The following table summarizes the findings so far for poles and for the order of r at where r is

r=5x2+64(2x2+1)2

pole c location pole order [r]c αc+ αc
i22 2 0 78 18
i22 2 0 78 18

Order of r at [r] α+ α
2 0 54 14

Now that the all [r]c and its associated αc± have been determined for all the poles in the set Γ and [r] and its associated α± have also been found, the next step is to determine possible non negative integer d from these using

d=αs()cΓαcs(c)

Where s(c) is either + or and s() is the sign of α±. This is done by trial over all set of families s=(s(c))cΓ until such d is found to work in finding candidate ω. Trying α+=54 then

d=α+(αc1+αc2)=54(14)=1

Since d an integer and d0 then it can be used to find ω using

ω=cΓ(s(c)[r]c+αcs(c)xc)+s()[r]

Substituting the above values in the above results in

ω=(()[r]c1+αc1xc1)+(()[r]c2+αc2xc2)+(+)[r]=18x4i2+18x+4i2+(0)=18x4i2+18x+4i2=x4x2+2

Now that ω is determined, the next step is find a corresponding minimal polynomial p(x) of degree d=1 to solve the ode. The polynomial p(x) needs to satisfy the equation

(1A)p+2ωp+(ω+ω2r)p=0

Let

(2A)p(x)=x+a0

Substituting the above in eq. (1A) gives

(0)+2(18x4i2+18x+4i2)(1)+((18(xi22)218(x+i22)2)+(18x4i2+18x+4i2)2(5x2+64(2x2+1)2))=0a02x2+1=0

Solving for the coefficients ai in the above using method of undetermined coefficients gives

{a0=0}

Substituting these coefficients in p(x) in eq. (2A) results in

p(x)=x

Therefore the first solution to the ode z=rz is

z1(x)=peωdx=(x)e(18x4i2+18x+4i2)dx=(x)((i22x)(2x+i2))1/8=x(4x22)1/8

The first solution to the original ode in y is found from

y1=z1e12BAdx=z1e127x2x2+1dx=z1e7ln(2x2+1)8=z1(1(2x2+1)7/8)

Which simplifies to

y1=27/8x(4x22)1/8(4x2+2)7/8

The second solution y2 to the original ode is found using reduction of order

y2=y1eBAdxy12dx

Substituting gives

y2=y1e7x2x2+1dx(y1)2dx=y1e7ln(2x2+1)4(y1)2dx=y1(21/4(4x2+2)7/44(2x2+1)7/4x2(4x22)1/4dx)

Therefore the solution is

y=c1y1+c2y2=c1(27/8x(4x22)1/8(4x2+2)7/8)+c2(27/8x(4x22)1/8(4x2+2)7/8(21/4(4x2+2)7/44(2x2+1)7/4x2(4x22)1/4dx))

Will add steps showing solving for IC soon.

Maple. Time used: 0.075 (sec). Leaf size: 37
ode:=(2*x^2+1)*diff(diff(y(x),x),x)+7*diff(y(x),x)*x+2*y(x) = 0; 
dsolve(ode,y(x), singsol=all);
 
y=c1LegendreP(14,34,i2x)+c2LegendreQ(14,34,i2x)(2x2+1)3/8

Maple trace

Methods for second order ODEs: 
--- Trying classification methods --- 
trying a quadrature 
checking if the LODE has constant coefficients 
checking if the LODE is of Euler type 
trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)] 
checking if the LODE is missing y 
-> Trying a Liouvillian solution using Kovacics algorithm 
   A Liouvillian solution exists 
   Reducible group (found an exponential solution) 
   Group is reducible, not completely reducible 
   Solution has integrals. Trying a special function solution free of integrals\ 
... 
   -> Trying a solution in terms of special functions: 
      -> Bessel 
      -> elliptic 
      -> Legendre 
      <- Legendre successful 
   <- special function solution successful 
      -> Trying to convert hypergeometric functions to elementary form... 
      <- elementary form is not straightforward to achieve - returning special \ 
function solution free of uncomputed integrals 
   <- Kovacics algorithm successful
 

Mathematica. Time used: 0.073 (sec). Leaf size: 66
ode=(1+2*x^2)*D[y[x],{x,2}]+7*x*D[y[x],x]+2*y[x]==0; 
ic={}; 
DSolve[{ode,ic},y[x],x,IncludeSingularSolutions->True]
 
y(x)c2Q1434(i2x)(2x2+1)3/8+2i24c1x(2x2+1)3/4Gamma(14)
Sympy
from sympy import * 
x = symbols("x") 
y = Function("y") 
ode = Eq(7*x*Derivative(y(x), x) + (2*x**2 + 1)*Derivative(y(x), (x, 2)) + 2*y(x),0) 
ics = {} 
dsolve(ode,func=y(x),ics=ics)
 
False