2.1.553 Problem 569

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm
Maple
Mathematica
Sympy

Internal problem ID [9725]
Book : Collection of Kovacic problems
Section : section 1
Problem number : 569
Date solved : Sunday, March 30, 2025 at 02:45:15 PM
CAS classification : [[_2nd_order, _with_linear_symmetries]]

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm

Time used: 0.291 (sec)

Writing the ode as

(1)(2x3+x2)y+(4x25x)y+(94x)y=0(2)Ay+By+Cy=0

Comparing (1) and (2) shows that

A=2x3+x2(3)B=4x25xC=94x

Applying the Liouville transformation on the dependent variable gives

z(x)=yeB2Adx

Then (2) becomes

(4)z(x)=rz(x)

Where r is given by

(5)r=st=2AB2BA+B24AC4A2

Substituting the values of A,B,C from (3) in the above and simplifying gives

(6)r=8x14(2x2x)2

Comparing the above to (5) shows that

s=8x1t=4(2x2x)2

Therefore eq. (4) becomes

(7)z(x)=(8x14(2x2x)2)z(x)

Equation (7) is now solved. After finding z(x) then y is found using the inverse transformation

y=z(x)eB2Adx

The first step is to determine the case of Kovacic algorithm this ode belongs to. There are 3 cases depending on the order of poles of r and the order of r at . The following table summarizes these cases.

Case

Allowed pole order for r

Allowed value for O()

1

{0,1,2,4,6,8,}

{,6,4,2,0,2,3,4,5,6,}

2

Need to have at least one pole that is either order 2 or odd order greater than 2. Any other pole order is allowed as long as the above condition is satisfied. Hence the following set of pole orders are all allowed. {1,2},{1,3},{2},{3},{3,4},{1,2,5}.

no condition

3

{1,2}

{2,3,4,5,6,7,}

Table 2.553: Necessary conditions for each Kovacic case

The order of r at is the degree of t minus the degree of s. Therefore

O()=deg(t)deg(s)=41=3

The poles of r in eq. (7) and the order of each pole are determined by solving for the roots of t=4(2x2x)2. There is a pole at x=0 of order 2. There is a pole at x=12 of order 2. Since there is no odd order pole larger than 2 and the order at is 3 then the necessary conditions for case one are met. Since there is a pole of order 2 then necessary conditions for case two are met. Since pole order is not larger than 2 and the order at is 3 then the necessary conditions for case three are met. Therefore

L=[1,2,4,6,12]

Attempting to find a solution using case n=1.

Looking at poles of order 2. The partial fractions decomposition of r is

r=1x14x2+34(x12)21x12

For the pole at x=0 let b be the coefficient of 1x2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=14. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=12αc=121+4b=12

For the pole at x=12 let b be the coefficient of 1(x12)2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=34. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=32αc=121+4b=12

Since the order of r at is 3>2 then

[r]=0α+=0α=1

The following table summarizes the findings so far for poles and for the order of r at where r is

r=8x14(2x2x)2

pole c location pole order [r]c αc+ αc
0 2 0 12 12
12 2 0 32 12

Order of r at [r] α+ α
3 0 0 1

Now that the all [r]c and its associated αc± have been determined for all the poles in the set Γ and [r] and its associated α± have also been found, the next step is to determine possible non negative integer d from these using

d=αs()cΓαcs(c)

Where s(c) is either + or and s() is the sign of α±. This is done by trial over all set of families s=(s(c))cΓ until such d is found to work in finding candidate ω. Trying α+=0 then

d=α+(αc1++αc2)=0(0)=0

Since d an integer and d0 then it can be used to find ω using

ω=cΓ(s(c)[r]c+αcs(c)xc)+s()[r]

Substituting the above values in the above results in

ω=((+)[r]c1+αc1+xc1)+(()[r]c2+αc2xc2)+(+)[r]=12x12(x12)+(0)=12x12(x12)=12x(1+2x)

Now that ω is determined, the next step is find a corresponding minimal polynomial p(x) of degree d=0 to solve the ode. The polynomial p(x) needs to satisfy the equation

(1A)p+2ωp+(ω+ω2r)p=0

Let

(2A)p(x)=1

Substituting the above in eq. (1A) gives

(0)+2(12x12(x12))(0)+((12x2+12(x12)2)+(12x12(x12))2(8x14(2x2x)2))=00=0

The equation is satisfied since both sides are zero. Therefore the first solution to the ode z=rz is

z1(x)=peωdx=e(12x12(x12))dx=x1+2x

The first solution to the original ode in y is found from

y1=z1e12BAdx=z1e124x25x2x3+x2dx=z1e3ln(1+2x)2+5ln(x)2=z1(x5/2(1+2x)3/2)

Which simplifies to

y1=x3(1+2x)2

The second solution y2 to the original ode is found using reduction of order

y2=y1eBAdxy12dx

Substituting gives

y2=y1e4x25x2x3+x2dx(y1)2dx=y1e3ln(1+2x)+5ln(x)(y1)2dx=y1(2xln(x))

Therefore the solution is

y=c1y1+c2y2=c1(x3(1+2x)2)+c2(x3(1+2x)2(2xln(x)))

Will add steps showing solving for IC soon.

Maple. Time used: 0.005 (sec). Leaf size: 26
ode:=x^2*(-2*x+1)*diff(diff(y(x),x),x)-x*(5-4*x)*diff(y(x),x)+(9-4*x)*y(x) = 0; 
dsolve(ode,y(x), singsol=all);
 
y=x3(2c2xc2ln(x)+c1)(1+2x)2

Maple trace

Methods for second order ODEs: 
--- Trying classification methods --- 
trying a quadrature 
checking if the LODE has constant coefficients 
checking if the LODE is of Euler type 
trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)] 
checking if the LODE is missing y 
-> Trying a Liouvillian solution using Kovacics algorithm 
   A Liouvillian solution exists 
   Reducible group (found an exponential solution) 
   Group is reducible, not completely reducible 
<- Kovacics algorithm successful
 

Maple step by step

Let’s solvex2(12x)(ddxddxy(x))x(54x)(ddxy(x))+(94x)y(x)=0Highest derivative means the order of the ODE is2ddxddxy(x)Isolate 2nd derivativeddxddxy(x)=(9+4x)y(x)x2(1+2x)+(5+4x)(ddxy(x))x(1+2x)Group terms withy(x)on the lhs of the ODE and the rest on the rhs of the ODE; ODE is linearddxddxy(x)(5+4x)(ddxy(x))x(1+2x)+(9+4x)y(x)x2(1+2x)=0Check to see ifx0is a regular singular pointDefine functions[P2(x)=5+4xx(1+2x),P3(x)=9+4xx2(1+2x)]xP2(x)is analytic atx=0(xP2(x))|x=0=5x2P3(x)is analytic atx=0(x2P3(x))|x=0=9x=0is a regular singular pointCheck to see ifx0is a regular singular pointx0=0Multiply by denominatorsx2(1+2x)(ddxddxy(x))x(5+4x)(ddxy(x))+(9+4x)y(x)=0Assume series solution fory(x)y(x)=k=0akxk+rRewrite ODE with series expansionsConvertxmy(x)to series expansion form=0..1xmy(x)=k=0akxk+r+mShift index usingk>kmxmy(x)=k=makmxk+rConvertxm(ddxy(x))to series expansion form=1..2xm(ddxy(x))=k=0ak(k+r)xk+r1+mShift index usingk>k+1mxm(ddxy(x))=k=1+mak+1m(k+1m+r)xk+rConvertxm(ddxddxy(x))to series expansion form=2..3xm(ddxddxy(x))=k=0ak(k+r)(k+r1)xk+r2+mShift index usingk>k+2mxm(ddxddxy(x))=k=2+mak+2m(k+2m+r)(k+1m+r)xk+rRewrite ODE with series expansionsa0(3+r)2xr+(k=1(ak(k+r3)2+2ak1(k+r2)(k+r3))xk+r)=0a0cannot be 0 by assumption, giving the indicial equation(3+r)2=0Values of r that satisfy the indicial equationr=3Each term in the series must be 0, giving the recursion relationak(k+r3)2+2ak1(k+r2)(k+r3)=0Shift index usingk>k+1ak+1(k+r2)2+2ak(k+r1)(k+r2)=0Recursion relation that defines series solution to ODEak+1=2ak(k+r1)k+r2Recursion relation forr=3ak+1=2ak(k+2)k+1Solution forr=3[y(x)=k=0akxk+3,ak+1=2ak(k+2)k+1]
Mathematica. Time used: 0.201 (sec). Leaf size: 95
ode=x^2*(1-2*x)*D[y[x],{x,2}]-x*(5-4*x)*D[y[x],x]+(9-4*x)*y[x]==0; 
ic={}; 
DSolve[{ode,ic},y[x],x,IncludeSingularSolutions->True]
 
y(x)exp(1x12K[1]4K[1]2dK[1]121x(62K[2]15K[2])dK[2])(c21xexp(21K[3]12K[1]4K[1]2dK[1])dK[3]+c1)
Sympy
from sympy import * 
x = symbols("x") 
y = Function("y") 
ode = Eq(x**2*(1 - 2*x)*Derivative(y(x), (x, 2)) - x*(5 - 4*x)*Derivative(y(x), x) + (9 - 4*x)*y(x),0) 
ics = {} 
dsolve(ode,func=y(x),ics=ics)
 
False