2.1.558 Problem 574

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm
Maple
Mathematica
Sympy

Internal problem ID [9730]
Book : Collection of Kovacic problems
Section : section 1
Problem number : 574
Date solved : Sunday, March 30, 2025 at 02:45:21 PM
CAS classification : [[_2nd_order, _with_linear_symmetries]]

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm

Time used: 0.322 (sec)

Writing the ode as

(1)(x3+x2)y+(x2+7x)y+(9x)y=0(2)Ay+By+Cy=0

Comparing (1) and (2) shows that

A=x3+x2(3)B=x2+7xC=9x

Applying the Liouville transformation on the dependent variable gives

z(x)=yeB2Adx

Then (2) becomes

(4)z(x)=rz(x)

Where r is given by

(5)r=st=2AB2BA+B24AC4A2

Substituting the values of A,B,C from (3) in the above and simplifying gives

(6)r=x2+82x14(x2x)2

Comparing the above to (5) shows that

s=x2+82x1t=4(x2x)2

Therefore eq. (4) becomes

(7)z(x)=(x2+82x14(x2x)2)z(x)

Equation (7) is now solved. After finding z(x) then y is found using the inverse transformation

y=z(x)eB2Adx

The first step is to determine the case of Kovacic algorithm this ode belongs to. There are 3 cases depending on the order of poles of r and the order of r at . The following table summarizes these cases.

Case

Allowed pole order for r

Allowed value for O()

1

{0,1,2,4,6,8,}

{,6,4,2,0,2,3,4,5,6,}

2

Need to have at least one pole that is either order 2 or odd order greater than 2. Any other pole order is allowed as long as the above condition is satisfied. Hence the following set of pole orders are all allowed. {1,2},{1,3},{2},{3},{3,4},{1,2,5}.

no condition

3

{1,2}

{2,3,4,5,6,7,}

Table 2.558: Necessary conditions for each Kovacic case

The order of r at is the degree of t minus the degree of s. Therefore

O()=deg(t)deg(s)=42=2

The poles of r in eq. (7) and the order of each pole are determined by solving for the roots of t=4(x2x)2. There is a pole at x=0 of order 2. There is a pole at x=1 of order 2. Since there is no odd order pole larger than 2 and the order at is 2 then the necessary conditions for case one are met. Since there is a pole of order 2 then necessary conditions for case two are met. Since pole order is not larger than 2 and the order at is 2 then the necessary conditions for case three are met. Therefore

L=[1,2,4,6,12]

Attempting to find a solution using case n=1.

Looking at poles of order 2. The partial fractions decomposition of r is

r=20(1+x)2+20x201+x14x2

For the pole at x=0 let b be the coefficient of 1x2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=14. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=12αc=121+4b=12

For the pole at x=1 let b be the coefficient of 1(1+x)2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=20. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=5αc=121+4b=4

Since the order of r at is 2 then [r]=0. Let b be the coefficient of 1x2 in the Laurent series expansion of r at . which can be found by dividing the leading coefficient of s by the leading coefficient of t from

r=st=x2+82x14(x2x)2

Since the gcd(s,t)=1. This gives b=14. Hence

[r]=0α+=12+1+4b=12α=121+4b=12

The following table summarizes the findings so far for poles and for the order of r at where r is

r=x2+82x14(x2x)2

pole c location pole order [r]c αc+ αc
0 2 0 12 12
1 2 0 5 4

Order of r at [r] α+ α
2 0 12 12

Now that the all [r]c and its associated αc± have been determined for all the poles in the set Γ and [r] and its associated α± have also been found, the next step is to determine possible non negative integer d from these using

d=αs()cΓαcs(c)

Where s(c) is either + or and s() is the sign of α±. This is done by trial over all set of families s=(s(c))cΓ until such d is found to work in finding candidate ω. Trying α=12 then

d=α(αc1++αc2)=12(72)=4

Since d an integer and d0 then it can be used to find ω using

ω=cΓ(s(c)[r]c+αcs(c)xc)+s()[r]

The above gives

ω=((+)[r]c1+αc1+xc1)+(()[r]c2+αc2xc2)+()[r]=12x41+x+()(0)=12x41+x=1+7x2x(1+x)

Now that ω is determined, the next step is find a corresponding minimal polynomial p(x) of degree d=4 to solve the ode. The polynomial p(x) needs to satisfy the equation

(1A)p+2ωp+(ω+ω2r)p=0

Let

(2A)p(x)=x4+a3x3+a2x2+a1x+a0

Substituting the above in eq. (1A) gives

(12x2+6xa3+2a2)+2(12x41+x)(4x3+3x2a3+2a2x+a1)+((12x2+4(1+x)2)+(12x41+x)2(x2+82x14(x2x)2))=0(a316)x3+(4a29a3)x2+(9a14a2)x+16a0a1x(1+x)=0

Solving for the coefficients ai in the above using method of undetermined coefficients gives

{a0=1,a1=16,a2=36,a3=16}

Substituting these coefficients in p(x) in eq. (2A) results in

p(x)=x4+16x3+36x2+16x+1

Therefore the first solution to the ode z=rz is

z1(x)=peωdx=(x4+16x3+36x2+16x+1)e(12x41+x)dx=(x4+16x3+36x2+16x+1)eln(x)24ln(1+x)=(x4+16x3+36x2+16x+1)x(1+x)4

The first solution to the original ode in y is found from

y1=z1e12BAdx=z1e12x2+7xx3+x2dx=z1e7ln(x)2+4ln(1+x)=z1((1+x)4x7/2)

Which simplifies to

y1=x4+16x3+36x2+16x+1x3

The second solution y2 to the original ode is found using reduction of order

y2=y1eBAdxy12dx

Substituting gives

y2=y1ex2+7xx3+x2dx(y1)2dx=y1e7ln(x)+8ln(1+x)(y1)2dx=y1(ln(x)20(2x3152x2143x512)x4+16x3+36x2+16x+1)

Therefore the solution is

y=c1y1+c2y2=c1(x4+16x3+36x2+16x+1x3)+c2(x4+16x3+36x2+16x+1x3(ln(x)20(2x3152x2143x512)x4+16x3+36x2+16x+1))

Will add steps showing solving for IC soon.

Maple. Time used: 0.005 (sec). Leaf size: 72
ode:=x^2*(1-x)*diff(diff(y(x),x),x)+x*(7+x)*diff(y(x),x)+(9-x)*y(x) = 0; 
dsolve(ode,y(x), singsol=all);
 
y=3c2(x4+16x3+36x2+16x+1)ln(x)+c1x4+(16c1+120c2)x3+(36c1+450c2)x2+(16c1+280c2)x+c1+25c2x3

Maple trace

Methods for second order ODEs: 
--- Trying classification methods --- 
trying a quadrature 
checking if the LODE has constant coefficients 
checking if the LODE is of Euler type 
trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)] 
checking if the LODE is missing y 
-> Trying a Liouvillian solution using Kovacics algorithm 
   A Liouvillian solution exists 
   Reducible group (found an exponential solution) 
   Group is reducible, not completely reducible 
<- Kovacics algorithm successful
 

Mathematica. Time used: 0.722 (sec). Leaf size: 145
ode=x^2*(1-x)*D[y[x],{x,2}]+x*(7+x)*D[y[x],x]+(9-x)*y[x]==0; 
ic={}; 
DSolve[{ode,ic},y[x],x,IncludeSingularSolutions->True]
 
y(x)(x4+16x3+36x2+16x+1)exp(1x(12K[1]4K[1]1)dK[1]121xK[2]+7K[2]K[2]2dK[2])(c21xexp(21K[3](12K[1]4K[1]1)dK[1])(K[3]4+16K[3]3+36K[3]2+16K[3]+1)2dK[3]+c1)
Sympy
from sympy import * 
x = symbols("x") 
y = Function("y") 
ode = Eq(x**2*(1 - x)*Derivative(y(x), (x, 2)) + x*(x + 7)*Derivative(y(x), x) + (9 - x)*y(x),0) 
ics = {} 
dsolve(ode,func=y(x),ics=ics)
 
False