2.1.587 Problem 603

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm
Maple
Mathematica
Sympy

Internal problem ID [9757]
Book : Collection of Kovacic problems
Section : section 1
Problem number : 603
Date solved : Friday, April 25, 2025 at 06:18:59 PM
CAS classification : [[_2nd_order, _with_linear_symmetries]]

Solve

x2(2x2+1)y+x(13x2+7)y14x2y=0

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm

Time used: 0.371 (sec)

Writing the ode as

(1)(2x4+x2)y+(13x3+7x)y14x2y=0(2)Ay+By+Cy=0

Comparing (1) and (2) shows that

A=2x4+x2(3)B=13x3+7xC=14x2

Applying the Liouville transformation on the dependent variable gives

z(x)=yeB2Adx

Then (2) becomes

(4)z(x)=rz(x)

Where r is given by

(5)r=st=2AB2BA+B24AC4A2

Substituting the values of A,B,C from (3) in the above and simplifying gives

(6)r=5x468x2+354(2x3x)2

Comparing the above to (5) shows that

s=5x468x2+35t=4(2x3x)2

Therefore eq. (4) becomes

(7)z(x)=(5x468x2+354(2x3x)2)z(x)

Equation (7) is now solved. After finding z(x) then y is found using the inverse transformation

y=z(x)eB2Adx

The first step is to determine the case of Kovacic algorithm this ode belongs to. There are 3 cases depending on the order of poles of r and the order of r at . The following table summarizes these cases.

Case

Allowed pole order for r

Allowed value for O()

1

{0,1,2,4,6,8,}

{,6,4,2,0,2,3,4,5,6,}

2

Need to have at least one pole that is either order 2 or odd order greater than 2. Any other pole order is allowed as long as the above condition is satisfied. Hence the following set of pole orders are all allowed. {1,2},{1,3},{2},{3},{3,4},{1,2,5}.

no condition

3

{1,2}

{2,3,4,5,6,7,}

Table 2.587: Necessary conditions for each Kovacic case

The order of r at is the degree of t minus the degree of s. Therefore

O()=deg(t)deg(s)=64=2

The poles of r in eq. (7) and the order of each pole are determined by solving for the roots of t=4(2x3x)2. There is a pole at x=0 of order 2. There is a pole at x=22 of order 2. There is a pole at x=22 of order 2. Since there is no odd order pole larger than 2 and the order at is 2 then the necessary conditions for case one are met. Since there is a pole of order 2 then necessary conditions for case two are met. Since pole order is not larger than 2 and the order at is 2 then the necessary conditions for case three are met. Therefore

L=[1,2,4,6,12]

Attempting to find a solution using case n=1.

Looking at poles of order 2. The partial fractions decomposition of r is

r=964(x22)2+964(x+22)2279264(x22)+279264(x+22)+354x2

For the pole at x=0 let b be the coefficient of 1x2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=354. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=72αc=121+4b=52

For the pole at x=22 let b be the coefficient of 1(x22)2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=964. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=98αc=121+4b=18

For the pole at x=22 let b be the coefficient of 1(x+22)2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=964. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=98αc=121+4b=18

Since the order of r at is 2 then [r]=0. Let b be the coefficient of 1x2 in the Laurent series expansion of r at . which can be found by dividing the leading coefficient of s by the leading coefficient of t from

r=st=5x468x2+354(2x3x)2

Since the gcd(s,t)=1. This gives b=516. Hence

[r]=0α+=12+1+4b=54α=121+4b=14

The following table summarizes the findings so far for poles and for the order of r at where r is

r=5x468x2+354(2x3x)2

pole c location pole order [r]c αc+ αc
0 2 0 72 52
22 2 0 98 18
22 2 0 98 18

Order of r at [r] α+ α
2 0 54 14

Now that the all [r]c and its associated αc± have been determined for all the poles in the set Γ and [r] and its associated α± have also been found, the next step is to determine possible non negative integer d from these using

d=αs()cΓαcs(c)

Where s(c) is either + or and s() is the sign of α±. This is done by trial over all set of families s=(s(c))cΓ until such d is found to work in finding candidate ω. Trying α=14 then

d=α(αc1+αc2++αc3+)=14(14)=0

Since d an integer and d0 then it can be used to find ω using

ω=cΓ(s(c)[r]c+αcs(c)xc)+s()[r]

The above gives

ω=(()[r]c1+αc1xc1)+((+)[r]c2+αc2+xc2)+((+)[r]c3+αc3+xc3)+()[r]=52x+98(x22)+98(x+22)+()(0)=52x+98(x22)+98(x+22)=x2+54x32x

Now that ω is determined, the next step is find a corresponding minimal polynomial p(x) of degree d=0 to solve the ode. The polynomial p(x) needs to satisfy the equation

(1A)p+2ωp+(ω+ω2r)p=0

Let

(2A)p(x)=1

Substituting the above in eq. (1A) gives

(0)+2(52x+98(x22)+98(x+22))(0)+((52x298(x22)298(x+22)2)+(52x+98(x22)+98(x+22))2(5x468x2+354(2x3x)2))=00=0

The equation is satisfied since both sides are zero. Therefore the first solution to the ode z=rz is

z1(x)=peωdx=e(52x+98(x22)+98(x+22))dx=(2x2)9/8(2x+2)9/8x5/2

The first solution to the original ode in y is found from

y1=z1e12BAdx=z1e1213x3+7x2x4+x2dx=z1eln(2x21)87ln(x)2=z1((2x21)1/8x7/2)

Which simplifies to

y1=2(2x21)5/421/8x6

The second solution y2 to the original ode is found using reduction of order

y2=y1eBAdxy12dx

Substituting gives

y2=y1e13x3+7x2x4+x2dx(y1)2dx=y1eln(2x21)47ln(x)(y1)2dx=y1((5x420x2+8)x7eln(2x21)47ln(x)23/4120(2x21)3/2)

Therefore the solution is

y=c1y1+c2y2=c1(2(2x21)5/421/8x6)+c2(2(2x21)5/421/8x6((5x420x2+8)x7eln(2x21)47ln(x)23/4120(2x21)3/2))

Will add steps showing solving for IC soon.

Maple. Time used: 0.016 (sec). Leaf size: 35
ode:=x^2*(-2*x^2+1)*diff(diff(y(x),x),x)+x*(-13*x^2+7)*diff(y(x),x)-14*x^2*y(x) = 0; 
dsolve(ode,y(x), singsol=all);
 
y=c1(2x21)5/4+5c2x420c2x2+8c2x6

Maple trace

Methods for second order ODEs: 
--- Trying classification methods --- 
trying a quadrature 
checking if the LODE has constant coefficients 
checking if the LODE is of Euler type 
trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)] 
checking if the LODE is missing y 
-> Trying a Liouvillian solution using Kovacics algorithm 
   A Liouvillian solution exists 
   Reducible group (found an exponential solution) 
   Reducible group (found another exponential solution) 
<- Kovacics algorithm successful
 

Maple step by step

Let’s solvex2(2x2+1)(ddxddxy(x))+x(13x2+7)(ddxy(x))14x2y(x)=0Highest derivative means the order of the ODE is2ddxddxy(x)Isolate 2nd derivativeddxddxy(x)=14y(x)2x21(13x27)(ddxy(x))x(2x21)Group terms withy(x)on the lhs of the ODE and the rest on the rhs of the ODE; ODE is linearddxddxy(x)+(13x27)(ddxy(x))x(2x21)+14y(x)2x21=0Check to see ifx0is a regular singular pointDefine functions[P2(x)=13x27x(2x21),P3(x)=142x21]xP2(x)is analytic atx=0(xP2(x))|x=0=7x2P3(x)is analytic atx=0(x2P3(x))|x=0=0x=0is a regular singular pointCheck to see ifx0is a regular singular pointx0=0Multiply by denominatorsx(2x21)(ddxddxy(x))+(13x27)(ddxy(x))+14y(x)x=0Assume series solution fory(x)y(x)=k=0akxk+rRewrite ODE with series expansionsConvertxy(x)to series expansionxy(x)=k=0akxk+r+1Shift index usingk>k1xy(x)=k=1ak1xk+rConvertxm(ddxy(x))to series expansion form=0..2xm(ddxy(x))=k=0ak(k+r)xk+r1+mShift index usingk>k+1mxm(ddxy(x))=k=1+mak+1m(k+1m+r)xk+rConvertxm(ddxddxy(x))to series expansion form=1..3xm(ddxddxy(x))=k=0ak(k+r)(k+r1)xk+r2+mShift index usingk>k+2mxm(ddxddxy(x))=k=2+mak+2m(k+2m+r)(k+1m+r)xk+rRewrite ODE with series expansionsa0r(6+r)x1+ra1(1+r)(7+r)xr+(k=1(ak+1(k+r+1)(k+7+r)+ak1(2k+5+2r)(k+r+1))xk+r)=0a0cannot be 0 by assumption, giving the indicial equationr(6+r)=0Values of r that satisfy the indicial equationr{6,0}Each term must be 0a1(1+r)(7+r)=0Each term in the series must be 0, giving the recursion relation2((k+r+52)ak1ak+1(k+7+r)2)(k+r+1)=0Shift index usingk>k+12((k+72+r)akak+2(k+8+r)2)(k+r+2)=0Recursion relation that defines series solution to ODEak+2=(2k+2r+7)akk+8+rRecursion relation forr=6ak+2=(2k5)akk+2Solution forr=6[y(x)=k=0akxk6,ak+2=(2k5)akk+2,5a1=0]Recursion relation forr=0ak+2=(2k+7)akk+8Solution forr=0[y(x)=k=0akxk,ak+2=(2k+7)akk+8,7a1=0]Combine solutions and rename parameters[y(x)=(k=0akxk6)+(k=0bkxk),ak+2=(2k5)akk+2,5a1=0,bk+2=(2k+7)bkk+8,7b1=0]
Mathematica. Time used: 0.214 (sec). Leaf size: 116
ode=x^2*(1-2*x^2)*D[y[x],{x,2}]+x*(7-13*x^2)*D[y[x],x]-14*x^2*y[x]==0; 
ic={}; 
DSolve[{ode,ic},y[x],x,IncludeSingularSolutions->True]
 
y(x)exp(1x5K[1]24K[1]32K[1]dK[1]121x713K[2]2K[2]2K[2]3dK[2])(c21xexp(21K[3]5K[1]24K[1]32K[1]dK[1])dK[3]+c1)
Sympy
from sympy import * 
x = symbols("x") 
y = Function("y") 
ode = Eq(x**2*(1 - 2*x**2)*Derivative(y(x), (x, 2)) - 14*x**2*y(x) + x*(7 - 13*x**2)*Derivative(y(x), x),0) 
ics = {} 
dsolve(ode,func=y(x),ics=ics)
 
False