2.1.598 Problem 614

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm
Maple
Mathematica
Sympy

Internal problem ID [9770]
Book : Collection of Kovacic problems
Section : section 1
Problem number : 614
Date solved : Sunday, March 30, 2025 at 02:46:14 PM
CAS classification : [[_2nd_order, _with_linear_symmetries]]

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm

Time used: 0.279 (sec)

Writing the ode as

(1)x2(1+x)y+3x2y+(x6)y=0(2)Ay+By+Cy=0

Comparing (1) and (2) shows that

A=x2(1+x)(3)B=3x2C=x6

Applying the Liouville transformation on the dependent variable gives

z(x)=yeB2Adx

Then (2) becomes

(4)z(x)=rz(x)

Where r is given by

(5)r=st=2AB2BA+B24AC4A2

Substituting the values of A,B,C from (3) in the above and simplifying gives

(6)r=x2+20x+244(x2+x)2

Comparing the above to (5) shows that

s=x2+20x+24t=4(x2+x)2

Therefore eq. (4) becomes

(7)z(x)=(x2+20x+244(x2+x)2)z(x)

Equation (7) is now solved. After finding z(x) then y is found using the inverse transformation

y=z(x)eB2Adx

The first step is to determine the case of Kovacic algorithm this ode belongs to. There are 3 cases depending on the order of poles of r and the order of r at . The following table summarizes these cases.

Case

Allowed pole order for r

Allowed value for O()

1

{0,1,2,4,6,8,}

{,6,4,2,0,2,3,4,5,6,}

2

Need to have at least one pole that is either order 2 or odd order greater than 2. Any other pole order is allowed as long as the above condition is satisfied. Hence the following set of pole orders are all allowed. {1,2},{1,3},{2},{3},{3,4},{1,2,5}.

no condition

3

{1,2}

{2,3,4,5,6,7,}

Table 2.598: Necessary conditions for each Kovacic case

The order of r at is the degree of t minus the degree of s. Therefore

O()=deg(t)deg(s)=42=2

The poles of r in eq. (7) and the order of each pole are determined by solving for the roots of t=4(x2+x)2. There is a pole at x=0 of order 2. There is a pole at x=1 of order 2. Since there is no odd order pole larger than 2 and the order at is 2 then the necessary conditions for case one are met. Since there is a pole of order 2 then necessary conditions for case two are met. Since pole order is not larger than 2 and the order at is 2 then the necessary conditions for case three are met. Therefore

L=[1,2,4,6,12]

Attempting to find a solution using case n=1.

Looking at poles of order 2. The partial fractions decomposition of r is

r=71+x+34(1+x)2+6x27x

For the pole at x=1 let b be the coefficient of 1(1+x)2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=34. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=32αc=121+4b=12

For the pole at x=0 let b be the coefficient of 1x2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=6. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=3αc=121+4b=2

Since the order of r at is 2 then [r]=0. Let b be the coefficient of 1x2 in the Laurent series expansion of r at . which can be found by dividing the leading coefficient of s by the leading coefficient of t from

r=st=x2+20x+244(x2+x)2

Since the gcd(s,t)=1. This gives b=14. Hence

[r]=0α+=12+1+4b=12α=121+4b=12

The following table summarizes the findings so far for poles and for the order of r at where r is

r=x2+20x+244(x2+x)2

pole c location pole order [r]c αc+ αc
1 2 0 32 12
0 2 0 3 2

Order of r at [r] α+ α
2 0 12 12

Now that the all [r]c and its associated αc± have been determined for all the poles in the set Γ and [r] and its associated α± have also been found, the next step is to determine possible non negative integer d from these using

d=αs()cΓαcs(c)

Where s(c) is either + or and s() is the sign of α±. This is done by trial over all set of families s=(s(c))cΓ until such d is found to work in finding candidate ω. Trying α=12 then

d=α(αc1++αc2)=12(12)=1

Since d an integer and d0 then it can be used to find ω using

ω=cΓ(s(c)[r]c+αcs(c)xc)+s()[r]

The above gives

ω=((+)[r]c1+αc1+xc1)+(()[r]c2+αc2xc2)+()[r]=32(1+x)2x+()(0)=32(1+x)2x=x+42x(1+x)

Now that ω is determined, the next step is find a corresponding minimal polynomial p(x) of degree d=1 to solve the ode. The polynomial p(x) needs to satisfy the equation

(1A)p+2ωp+(ω+ω2r)p=0

Let

(2A)p(x)=x+a0

Substituting the above in eq. (1A) gives

(0)+2(32(1+x)2x)(1)+((32(1+x)2+2x2)+(32(1+x)2x)2(x2+20x+244(x2+x)2))=04+a0x(1+x)=0

Solving for the coefficients ai in the above using method of undetermined coefficients gives

{a0=4}

Substituting these coefficients in p(x) in eq. (2A) results in

p(x)=x+4

Therefore the first solution to the ode z=rz is

z1(x)=peωdx=(x+4)e(32(1+x)2x)dx=(x+4)e2ln(x)+3ln(1+x)2=(x+4)(1+x)3/2x2

The first solution to the original ode in y is found from

y1=z1e12BAdx=z1e123x2x2(1+x)dx=z1e3ln(1+x)2=z1(1(1+x)3/2)

Which simplifies to

y1=x+4x2

The second solution y2 to the original ode is found using reduction of order

y2=y1eBAdxy12dx

Substituting gives

y2=y1e3x2x2(1+x)dx(y1)2dx=y1e3ln(1+x)(y1)2dx=y1(25627(x+4)+ln(1+x)118(1+x)2+1427(1+x))

Therefore the solution is

y=c1y1+c2y2=c1(x+4x2)+c2(x+4x2(25627(x+4)+ln(1+x)118(1+x)2+1427(1+x)))

Will add steps showing solving for IC soon.

Maple. Time used: 0.005 (sec). Leaf size: 45
ode:=x^2*(x+1)*diff(diff(y(x),x),x)+3*x^2*diff(y(x),x)-(6-x)*y(x) = 0; 
dsolve(ode,y(x), singsol=all);
 
y=c1(x+4)+c2(6(x+4)(1+x)2ln(1+x)+60x2+129x+68)(1+x)2x2

Maple trace

Methods for second order ODEs: 
--- Trying classification methods --- 
trying a quadrature 
checking if the LODE has constant coefficients 
checking if the LODE is of Euler type 
trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)] 
checking if the LODE is missing y 
-> Trying a Liouvillian solution using Kovacics algorithm 
   A Liouvillian solution exists 
   Reducible group (found an exponential solution) 
   Group is reducible, not completely reducible 
<- Kovacics algorithm successful
 

Maple step by step

Let’s solvex2(1+x)(ddxddxy(x))+3x2(ddxy(x))(6x)y(x)=0Highest derivative means the order of the ODE is2ddxddxy(x)Isolate 2nd derivativeddxddxy(x)=(6+x)y(x)x2(1+x)3(ddxy(x))1+xGroup terms withy(x)on the lhs of the ODE and the rest on the rhs of the ODE; ODE is linearddxddxy(x)+3(ddxy(x))1+x+(6+x)y(x)x2(1+x)=0Check to see ifx0is a regular singular pointDefine functions[P2(x)=31+x,P3(x)=6+xx2(1+x)](1+x)P2(x)is analytic atx=1((1+x)P2(x))|x=1=3(1+x)2P3(x)is analytic atx=1((1+x)2P3(x))|x=1=0x=1is a regular singular pointCheck to see ifx0is a regular singular pointx0=1Multiply by denominatorsx2(1+x)(ddxddxy(x))+3x2(ddxy(x))+(6+x)y(x)=0Change variables usingx=u1so that the regular singular point is atu=0(u32u2+u)(ddudduy(u))+(3u26u+3)(dduy(u))+(7+u)y(u)=0Assume series solution fory(u)y(u)=k=0akuk+rRewrite ODE with series expansionsConvertumy(u)to series expansion form=0..1umy(u)=k=0akuk+r+mShift index usingk>kmumy(u)=k=makmuk+rConvertum(dduy(u))to series expansion form=0..2um(dduy(u))=k=0ak(k+r)uk+r1+mShift index usingk>k+1mum(dduy(u))=k=1+mak+1m(k+1m+r)uk+rConvertum(ddudduy(u))to series expansion form=1..3um(ddudduy(u))=k=0ak(k+r)(k+r1)uk+r2+mShift index usingk>k+2mum(ddudduy(u))=k=2+mak+2m(k+2m+r)(k+1m+r)uk+rRewrite ODE with series expansionsa0r(2+r)u1+r+(a1(1+r)(3+r)a0(2r2+4r+7))ur+(k=1(ak+1(k+r+1)(k+3+r)ak(2k2+4kr+2r2+4k+4r+7)+ak1(k+r)2)uk+r)=0a0cannot be 0 by assumption, giving the indicial equationr(2+r)=0Values of r that satisfy the indicial equationr{2,0}Each term must be 0a1(1+r)(3+r)a0(2r2+4r+7)=0Each term in the series must be 0, giving the recursion relationak1(k+r)2+ak+1(k+r+1)(k+3+r)2ak(k2+(2r+2)k+r2+2r+72)=0Shift index usingk>k+1ak(k+r+1)2+ak+2(k+r+2)(k+4+r)2ak+1((k+1)2+(2r+2)(k+1)+r2+2r+72)=0Recursion relation that defines series solution to ODEak+2=k2ak2k2ak+1+2krak4krak+1+r2ak2r2ak+1+2kak8kak+1+2rak8rak+1+ak13ak+1(k+r+2)(k+4+r)Recursion relation forr=2ak+2=k2ak2k2ak+12kak+ak5ak+1k(k+2)Series not valid forr=2, division by0in the recursion relation atk=0ak+2=k2ak2k2ak+12kak+ak5ak+1k(k+2)Recursion relation forr=0ak+2=k2ak2k2ak+1+2kak8kak+1+ak13ak+1(k+2)(k+4)Solution forr=0[y(u)=k=0akuk,ak+2=k2ak2k2ak+1+2kak8kak+1+ak13ak+1(k+2)(k+4),3a17a0=0]Revert the change of variablesu=1+x[y(x)=k=0ak(1+x)k,ak+2=k2ak2k2ak+1+2kak8kak+1+ak13ak+1(k+2)(k+4),3a17a0=0]
Mathematica. Time used: 0.474 (sec). Leaf size: 91
ode=x^2*(1+x)*D[y[x],{x,2}]+3*x^2*D[y[x],x]-(6-x)*y[x]==0; 
ic={}; 
DSolve[{ode,ic},y[x],x,IncludeSingularSolutions->True]
 
y(x)(x+4)exp(1x(32(K[1]+1)2K[1])dK[1])(c21xexp(21K[2](32(K[1]+1)2K[1])dK[1])(K[2]+4)2dK[2]+c1)(x+1)3/2
Sympy
from sympy import * 
x = symbols("x") 
y = Function("y") 
ode = Eq(x**2*(x + 1)*Derivative(y(x), (x, 2)) + 3*x**2*Derivative(y(x), x) - (6 - x)*y(x),0) 
ics = {} 
dsolve(ode,func=y(x),ics=ics)
 
False