2.1.610 Problem 626

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm
Maple
Mathematica
Sympy

Internal problem ID [9782]
Book : Collection of Kovacic problems
Section : section 1
Problem number : 626
Date solved : Sunday, March 30, 2025 at 02:46:31 PM
CAS classification : [[_2nd_order, _with_linear_symmetries]]

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm

Time used: 0.458 (sec)

Writing the ode as

(1)(x4+x2)y+(2x3+5x)y21y=0(2)Ay+By+Cy=0

Comparing (1) and (2) shows that

A=x4+x2(3)B=2x3+5xC=21

Applying the Liouville transformation on the dependent variable gives

z(x)=yeB2Adx

Then (2) becomes

(4)z(x)=rz(x)

Where r is given by

(5)r=st=2AB2BA+B24AC4A2

Substituting the values of A,B,C from (3) in the above and simplifying gives

(6)r=78x2+994(x3+x)2

Comparing the above to (5) shows that

s=78x2+99t=4(x3+x)2

Therefore eq. (4) becomes

(7)z(x)=(78x2+994(x3+x)2)z(x)

Equation (7) is now solved. After finding z(x) then y is found using the inverse transformation

y=z(x)eB2Adx

The first step is to determine the case of Kovacic algorithm this ode belongs to. There are 3 cases depending on the order of poles of r and the order of r at . The following table summarizes these cases.

Case

Allowed pole order for r

Allowed value for O()

1

{0,1,2,4,6,8,}

{,6,4,2,0,2,3,4,5,6,}

2

Need to have at least one pole that is either order 2 or odd order greater than 2. Any other pole order is allowed as long as the above condition is satisfied. Hence the following set of pole orders are all allowed. {1,2},{1,3},{2},{3},{3,4},{1,2,5}.

no condition

3

{1,2}

{2,3,4,5,6,7,}

Table 2.610: Necessary conditions for each Kovacic case

The order of r at is the degree of t minus the degree of s. Therefore

O()=deg(t)deg(s)=62=4

The poles of r in eq. (7) and the order of each pole are determined by solving for the roots of t=4(x3+x)2. There is a pole at x=0 of order 2. There is a pole at x=i of order 2. There is a pole at x=i of order 2. Since there is no odd order pole larger than 2 and the order at is 4 then the necessary conditions for case one are met. Since there is a pole of order 2 then necessary conditions for case two are met. Since pole order is not larger than 2 and the order at is 4 then the necessary conditions for case three are met. Therefore

L=[1,2,4,6,12]

Attempting to find a solution using case n=1.

Looking at poles of order 2. The partial fractions decomposition of r is

r=994x2+2116(xi)2+2116(x+i)2+219i16(xi)219i16(x+i)

For the pole at x=0 let b be the coefficient of 1x2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=994. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=112αc=121+4b=92

For the pole at x=i let b be the coefficient of 1(xi)2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=2116. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=74αc=121+4b=34

For the pole at x=i let b be the coefficient of 1(x+i)2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=2116. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=74αc=121+4b=34

Since the order of r at is 4>2 then

[r]=0α+=0α=1

The following table summarizes the findings so far for poles and for the order of r at where r is

r=78x2+994(x3+x)2

pole c location pole order [r]c αc+ αc
0 2 0 112 92
i 2 0 74 34
i 2 0 74 34

Order of r at [r] α+ α
4 0 0 1

Now that the all [r]c and its associated αc± have been determined for all the poles in the set Γ and [r] and its associated α± have also been found, the next step is to determine possible non negative integer d from these using

d=αs()cΓαcs(c)

Where s(c) is either + or and s() is the sign of α±. This is done by trial over all set of families s=(s(c))cΓ until such d is found to work in finding candidate ω. Trying α=1 then

d=α(αc1+αc2++αc3+)=1(1)=2

Since d an integer and d0 then it can be used to find ω using

ω=cΓ(s(c)[r]c+αcs(c)xc)+s()[r]

The above gives

ω=(()[r]c1+αc1xc1)+((+)[r]c2+αc2+xc2)+((+)[r]c3+αc3+xc3)+()[r]=92x+74(xi)+74(x+i)+()(0)=92x+74(xi)+74(x+i)=92x+7x2x2+2

Now that ω is determined, the next step is find a corresponding minimal polynomial p(x) of degree d=2 to solve the ode. The polynomial p(x) needs to satisfy the equation

(1A)p+2ωp+(ω+ω2r)p=0

Let

(2A)p(x)=x2+a1x+a0

Substituting the above in eq. (1A) gives

(2)+2(92x+74(xi)+74(x+i))(2x+a1)+((92x274(xi)274(x+i)2)+(92x+74(xi)+74(x+i))2(78x2+994(x3+x)2))=0(x2+1)(2xa016x9a1)(x+i)2(x+i)2x=0

Solving for the coefficients ai in the above using method of undetermined coefficients gives

{a0=8,a1=0}

Substituting these coefficients in p(x) in eq. (2A) results in

p(x)=x2+8

Therefore the first solution to the ode z=rz is

z1(x)=peωdx=(x2+8)e(92x+74(xi)+74(x+i))dx=(x2+8)e9ln(x)2+7ln(x2+1)4=(x2+8)(x2+1)7/4x9/2

The first solution to the original ode in y is found from

y1=z1e12BAdx=z1e122x3+5xx4+x2dx=z1e5ln(x)2+3ln(x2+1)4=z1((x2+1)3/4x5/2)

Which simplifies to

y1=(x2+1)5/2(x2+8)x7

The second solution y2 to the original ode is found using reduction of order

y2=y1eBAdxy12dx

Substituting gives

y2=y1e2x3+5xx4+x2dx(y1)2dx=y1e5ln(x)+3ln(x2+1)2(y1)2dx=y1((35x6+140x4+168x2+64)x5e5ln(x)+3ln(x2+1)235(x2+1)4(x2+8))

Therefore the solution is

y=c1y1+c2y2=c1((x2+1)5/2(x2+8)x7)+c2((x2+1)5/2(x2+8)x7((35x6+140x4+168x2+64)x5e5ln(x)+3ln(x2+1)235(x2+1)4(x2+8)))

Will add steps showing solving for IC soon.

Maple. Time used: 0.018 (sec). Leaf size: 41
ode:=x^2*(x^2+1)*diff(diff(y(x),x),x)+x*(2*x^2+5)*diff(y(x),x)-21*y(x) = 0; 
dsolve(ode,y(x), singsol=all);
 
y=c1(x2+1)5/2(x2+8)+35(x6+4x4+245x2+6435)c2x7

Maple trace

Methods for second order ODEs: 
--- Trying classification methods --- 
trying a quadrature 
checking if the LODE has constant coefficients 
checking if the LODE is of Euler type 
trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)] 
checking if the LODE is missing y 
-> Trying a Liouvillian solution using Kovacics algorithm 
   A Liouvillian solution exists 
   Reducible group (found an exponential solution) 
   Reducible group (found another exponential solution) 
<- Kovacics algorithm successful
 

Maple step by step

Let’s solvex2(x2+1)(ddxddxy(x))+x(2x2+5)(ddxy(x))21y(x)=0Highest derivative means the order of the ODE is2ddxddxy(x)Isolate 2nd derivativeddxddxy(x)=21y(x)x2(x2+1)(2x2+5)(ddxy(x))x(x2+1)Group terms withy(x)on the lhs of the ODE and the rest on the rhs of the ODE; ODE is linearddxddxy(x)+(2x2+5)(ddxy(x))x(x2+1)21y(x)x2(x2+1)=0Check to see ifx0is a regular singular pointDefine functions[P2(x)=2x2+5x(x2+1),P3(x)=21x2(x2+1)]xP2(x)is analytic atx=0(xP2(x))|x=0=5x2P3(x)is analytic atx=0(x2P3(x))|x=0=21x=0is a regular singular pointCheck to see ifx0is a regular singular pointx0=0Multiply by denominatorsx2(x2+1)(ddxddxy(x))+x(2x2+5)(ddxy(x))21y(x)=0Assume series solution fory(x)y(x)=k=0akxk+rRewrite ODE with series expansionsConvertxm(ddxy(x))to series expansion form=1..3xm(ddxy(x))=k=0ak(k+r)xk+r1+mShift index usingk>k+1mxm(ddxy(x))=k=1+mak+1m(k+1m+r)xk+rConvertxm(ddxddxy(x))to series expansion form=2..4xm(ddxddxy(x))=k=0ak(k+r)(k+r1)xk+r2+mShift index usingk>k+2mxm(ddxddxy(x))=k=2+mak+2m(k+2m+r)(k+1m+r)xk+rRewrite ODE with series expansionsa0(7+r)(3+r)xr+a1(8+r)(2+r)x1+r+(k=2(ak(k+r+7)(k+r3)+ak2(k2+r)(k+r1))xk+r)=0a0cannot be 0 by assumption, giving the indicial equation(7+r)(3+r)=0Values of r that satisfy the indicial equationr{7,3}Each term must be 0a1(8+r)(2+r)=0Solve for the dependent coefficient(s)a1=0Each term in the series must be 0, giving the recursion relationak(k+r+7)(k+r3)+ak2(k2+r)(k+r1)=0Shift index usingk>k+2ak+2(k+9+r)(k+r1)+ak(k+r)(k+r+1)=0Recursion relation that defines series solution to ODEak+2=ak(k+r)(k+r+1)(k+9+r)(k+r1)Recursion relation forr=7; series terminates atk=6ak+2=ak(k7)(k6)(k+2)(k8)Solution forr=7[y(x)=k=0akxk7,ak+2=ak(k7)(k6)(k+2)(k8),a1=0]Recursion relation forr=3ak+2=ak(k+3)(k+4)(k+12)(k+2)Solution forr=3[y(x)=k=0akxk+3,ak+2=ak(k+3)(k+4)(k+12)(k+2),a1=0]Combine solutions and rename parameters[y(x)=(k=0akxk7)+(k=0bkxk+3),ak+2=ak(k7)(k6)(k+2)(k8),a1=0,bk+2=bk(k+3)(k+4)(k+12)(k+2),b1=0]
Mathematica. Time used: 0.431 (sec). Leaf size: 126
ode=x^2*(1+x^2)*D[y[x],{x,2}]+x*(5+2*x^2)*D[y[x],x]-21*y[x]==0; 
ic={}; 
DSolve[{ode,ic},y[x],x,IncludeSingularSolutions->True]
 
y(x)(x2+8)exp(1x2K[1]2+92(K[1]3+K[1])dK[1]121x2K[2]2+5K[2]3+K[2]dK[2])(c21xexp(21K[3]2K[1]2+92(K[1]3+K[1])dK[1])(K[3]2+8)2dK[3]+c1)
Sympy
from sympy import * 
x = symbols("x") 
y = Function("y") 
ode = Eq(x**2*(x**2 + 1)*Derivative(y(x), (x, 2)) + x*(2*x**2 + 5)*Derivative(y(x), x) - 21*y(x),0) 
ics = {} 
dsolve(ode,func=y(x),ics=ics)
 
False