2.1.62 Problem 64

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm
Maple
Mathematica
Sympy

Internal problem ID [9232]
Book : Collection of Kovacic problems
Section : section 1
Problem number : 64
Date solved : Friday, April 25, 2025 at 06:00:26 PM
CAS classification : [[_2nd_order, _with_linear_symmetries]]

Solve

(2x2+4x+5)y20(x+1)y+60y=0

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm

Time used: 0.771 (sec)

Writing the ode as

(1)(2x2+4x+5)y+(20x20)y+60y=0(2)Ay+By+Cy=0

Comparing (1) and (2) shows that

A=2x2+4x+5(3)B=20x20C=60

Applying the Liouville transformation on the dependent variable gives

z(x)=yeB2Adx

Then (2) becomes

(4)z(x)=rz(x)

Where r is given by

(5)r=st=2AB2BA+B24AC4A2

Substituting the values of A,B,C from (3) in the above and simplifying gives

(6)r=210(2x2+4x+5)2

Comparing the above to (5) shows that

s=210t=(2x2+4x+5)2

Therefore eq. (4) becomes

(7)z(x)=(210(2x2+4x+5)2)z(x)

Equation (7) is now solved. After finding z(x) then y is found using the inverse transformation

y=z(x)eB2Adx

The first step is to determine the case of Kovacic algorithm this ode belongs to. There are 3 cases depending on the order of poles of r and the order of r at . The following table summarizes these cases.

Case

Allowed pole order for r

Allowed value for O()

1

{0,1,2,4,6,8,}

{,6,4,2,0,2,3,4,5,6,}

2

Need to have at least one pole that is either order 2 or odd order greater than 2. Any other pole order is allowed as long as the above condition is satisfied. Hence the following set of pole orders are all allowed. {1,2},{1,3},{2},{3},{3,4},{1,2,5}.

no condition

3

{1,2}

{2,3,4,5,6,7,}

Table 2.62: Necessary conditions for each Kovacic case

The order of r at is the degree of t minus the degree of s. Therefore

O()=deg(t)deg(s)=40=4

The poles of r in eq. (7) and the order of each pole are determined by solving for the roots of t=(2x2+4x+5)2. There is a pole at x=1+i62 of order 2. There is a pole at x=1i62 of order 2. Since there is no odd order pole larger than 2 and the order at is 4 then the necessary conditions for case one are met. Since there is a pole of order 2 then necessary conditions for case two are met. Since pole order is not larger than 2 and the order at is 4 then the necessary conditions for case three are met. Therefore

L=[1,2,4,6,12]

Attempting to find a solution using case n=1.

Looking at poles of order 2. The partial fractions decomposition of r is

r=354(x+1i62)2+354(x+1+i62)2+35i612(x+1i62)35i612(x+1+i62)

For the pole at x=1+i62 let b be the coefficient of 1(x+1i62)2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=354. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=72αc=121+4b=52

For the pole at x=1i62 let b be the coefficient of 1(x+1+i62)2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=354. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=72αc=121+4b=52

Since the order of r at is 4>2 then

[r]=0α+=0α=1

The following table summarizes the findings so far for poles and for the order of r at where r is

r=210(2x2+4x+5)2

pole c location pole order [r]c αc+ αc
1+i62 2 0 72 52
1i62 2 0 72 52

Order of r at [r] α+ α
4 0 0 1

Now that the all [r]c and its associated αc± have been determined for all the poles in the set Γ and [r] and its associated α± have also been found, the next step is to determine possible non negative integer d from these using

d=αs()cΓαcs(c)

Where s(c) is either + or and s() is the sign of α±. This is done by trial over all set of families s=(s(c))cΓ until such d is found to work in finding candidate ω. Trying α=1 then

d=α(αc1+αc2+)=1(1)=0

Since d an integer and d0 then it can be used to find ω using

ω=cΓ(s(c)[r]c+αcs(c)xc)+s()[r]

The above gives

ω=(()[r]c1+αc1xc1)+((+)[r]c2+αc2+xc2)+()[r]=52(x+1i62)+72(x+1+i62)+()(0)=52(x+1i62)+72(x+1+i62)=6i6+2x+22x2+4x+5

Now that ω is determined, the next step is find a corresponding minimal polynomial p(x) of degree d=0 to solve the ode. The polynomial p(x) needs to satisfy the equation

(1A)p+2ωp+(ω+ω2r)p=0

Let

(2A)p(x)=1

Substituting the above in eq. (1A) gives

(0)+2(52(x+1i62)+72(x+1+i62))(0)+((52(x+1i62)272(x+1+i62)2)+(52(x+1i62)+72(x+1+i62))2(210(2x2+4x+5)2))=00=0

The equation is satisfied since both sides are zero. Therefore the first solution to the ode z=rz is

z1(x)=peωdx=e(52(x+1i62)+72(x+1+i62))dx=272(2x2+4x+5)7/2(3+i(x+1)6)6

The first solution to the original ode in y is found from

y1=z1e12BAdx=z1e1220x202x2+4x+5dx=z1e5ln(2x2+4x+5)2=z1((2x2+4x+5)5/2)

Which simplifies to

y1=(2x2+4x+5)6227(i(x+1)233)6

The second solution y2 to the original ode is found using reduction of order

y2=y1eBAdxy12dx

Substituting gives

y2=y1e20x202x2+4x+5dx(y1)2dx=y1e5ln(2x2+4x+5)(y1)2dx=y1(12x5+52x4+52x352x2318x782(x+1+i62)6)

Therefore the solution is

y=c1y1+c2y2=c1((2x2+4x+5)6227(i(x+1)233)6)+c2((2x2+4x+5)6227(i(x+1)233)6(12x5+52x4+52x352x2318x782(x+1+i62)6))

Will add steps showing solving for IC soon.

Maple. Time used: 0.003 (sec). Leaf size: 65
ode:=(2*x^2+4*x+5)*diff(diff(y(x),x),x)-20*(1+x)*diff(y(x),x)+60*y(x) = 0; 
dsolve(ode,y(x), singsol=all);
 
y=c2x6+c1x5+5(2c115c2)x42+5(c120c2)x3+5(4c145c2)x24+(31c1+120c2)x47c14+155c28

Maple trace

Methods for second order ODEs: 
--- Trying classification methods --- 
trying a quadrature 
checking if the LODE has constant coefficients 
checking if the LODE is of Euler type 
trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)] 
checking if the LODE is missing y 
-> Trying a Liouvillian solution using Kovacics algorithm 
   A Liouvillian solution exists 
   Reducible group (found an exponential solution) 
<- Kovacics algorithm successful
 

Maple step by step

Let’s solve(2x2+4x+5)(ddxddxy(x))20(x+1)(ddxy(x))+60y(x)=0Highest derivative means the order of the ODE is2ddxddxy(x)Isolate 2nd derivativeddxddxy(x)=60y(x)2x2+4x+5+20(x+1)(ddxy(x))2x2+4x+5Group terms withy(x)on the lhs of the ODE and the rest on the rhs of the ODE; ODE is linearddxddxy(x)20(x+1)(ddxy(x))2x2+4x+5+60y(x)2x2+4x+5=0Check to see ifx0is a regular singular pointDefine functions[P2(x)=20(x+1)2x2+4x+5,P3(x)=602x2+4x+5](x+1+I62)P2(x)is analytic atx=1I62((x+1+I62)P2(x))|x=1I62=0(x+1+I62)2P3(x)is analytic atx=1I62((x+1+I62)2P3(x))|x=1I62=0x=1I62is a regular singular pointCheck to see ifx0is a regular singular pointx0=1I62Multiply by denominators(2x2+4x+5)(ddxddxy(x))+(20x20)(ddxy(x))+60y(x)=0Change variables usingx=u1I62so that the regular singular point is atu=0(2u22Iu6)(ddudduy(u))+(20u+10I6)(dduy(u))+60y(u)=0Assume series solution fory(u)y(u)=k=0akuk+rRewrite ODE with series expansionsConvertum(dduy(u))to series expansion form=0..1um(dduy(u))=k=0ak(k+r)uk+r1+mShift index usingk>k+1mum(dduy(u))=k=1+mak+1m(k+1m+r)uk+rConvertum(ddudduy(u))to series expansion form=1..2um(ddudduy(u))=k=0ak(k+r)(k+r1)uk+r2+mShift index usingk>k+2mum(ddudduy(u))=k=2+mak+2m(k+2m+r)(k+1m+r)uk+rRewrite ODE with series expansions2I6(r6)ra0u1+r+(k=0(2I6(k+r5)(k+1+r)ak+1+2ak(k+r5)(k+r6))uk+r)=0a0cannot be 0 by assumption, giving the indicial equation2I6(r6)r=0Values of r that satisfy the indicial equationr{0,6}Each term in the series must be 0, giving the recursion relation2(I(k+1+r)ak+16ak(k+r6))(k+r5)=0Recursion relation that defines series solution to ODEak+1=I6ak(k+r6)6k+1+rRecursion relation forr=0; series terminates atk=6ak+1=I6ak(k6)6k+1Recursion relation that defines the terminating series solution of the ODE forr=0[y(u)=k=05akuk,ak+1=I6ak(k6)6k+1]Revert the change of variablesu=x+1+I62[y(x)=k=05ak(x+1+I62)k,ak+1=I6ak(k6)6k+1]Recursion relation forr=6ak+1=I6akk6k+7Solution forr=6[y(u)=k=0akuk+6,ak+1=I6akk6k+7]Revert the change of variablesu=x+1+I62[y(x)=k=0ak(x+1+I62)k+6,ak+1=I6akk6k+7]Combine solutions and rename parameters[y(x)=(k=05ak(x+1+I62)k)+(k=0bk(x+1+I62)k+6),ak+1=I6ak(k6)6k+1,bk+1=I6bkk6k+7]
Mathematica. Time used: 0.582 (sec). Leaf size: 108
ode=(2*x^2+4*x+5)*D[y[x],{x,2}]-20*(x+1)*D[y[x],x]+60*y[x]==0; 
ic={}; 
DSolve[{ode,ic},y[x],x,IncludeSingularSolutions->True]
 
y(x)(2x2+4x+5)5/2exp(1x2(K[1]+3i6+1)2K[1](K[1]+2)+5dK[1])(c21xexp(21K[2]2(K[1]+3i6+1)2K[1](K[1]+2)+5dK[1])dK[2]+c1)
Sympy. Time used: 1.102 (sec). Leaf size: 3
from sympy import * 
x = symbols("x") 
y = Function("y") 
ode = Eq((-20*x - 20)*Derivative(y(x), x) + (2*x**2 + 4*x + 5)*Derivative(y(x), (x, 2)) + 60*y(x),0) 
ics = {} 
dsolve(ode,func=y(x),ics=ics)
 
y(x)=O(1)