2.1.760 Problem 782

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm
Maple
Mathematica
Sympy

Internal problem ID [9932]
Book : Collection of Kovacic problems
Section : section 1
Problem number : 782
Date solved : Sunday, March 30, 2025 at 02:49:51 PM
CAS classification : [[_2nd_order, _with_linear_symmetries]]

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm

Time used: 0.325 (sec)

Writing the ode as

(1)16x2y+32xy+(x412)y=0(2)Ay+By+Cy=0

Comparing (1) and (2) shows that

A=16x2(3)B=32xC=x412

Applying the Liouville transformation on the dependent variable gives

z(x)=yeB2Adx

Then (2) becomes

(4)z(x)=rz(x)

Where r is given by

(5)r=st=2AB2BA+B24AC4A2

Substituting the values of A,B,C from (3) in the above and simplifying gives

(6)r=x4+1216x2

Comparing the above to (5) shows that

s=x4+12t=16x2

Therefore eq. (4) becomes

(7)z(x)=(x4+1216x2)z(x)

Equation (7) is now solved. After finding z(x) then y is found using the inverse transformation

y=z(x)eB2Adx

The first step is to determine the case of Kovacic algorithm this ode belongs to. There are 3 cases depending on the order of poles of r and the order of r at . The following table summarizes these cases.

Case

Allowed pole order for r

Allowed value for O()

1

{0,1,2,4,6,8,}

{,6,4,2,0,2,3,4,5,6,}

2

Need to have at least one pole that is either order 2 or odd order greater than 2. Any other pole order is allowed as long as the above condition is satisfied. Hence the following set of pole orders are all allowed. {1,2},{1,3},{2},{3},{3,4},{1,2,5}.

no condition

3

{1,2}

{2,3,4,5,6,7,}

Table 2.760: Necessary conditions for each Kovacic case

The order of r at is the degree of t minus the degree of s. Therefore

O()=deg(t)deg(s)=24=2

The poles of r in eq. (7) and the order of each pole are determined by solving for the roots of t=16x2. There is a pole at x=0 of order 2. Since there is no odd order pole larger than 2 and the order at is 2 then the necessary conditions for case one are met. Since there is a pole of order 2 then necessary conditions for case two are met. Therefore

L=[1,2]

Attempting to find a solution using case n=1.

Looking at poles of order 2. The partial fractions decomposition of r is

r=x216+34x2

For the pole at x=0 let b be the coefficient of 1x2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=34. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=32αc=121+4b=12

Since the order of r at is Or()=2 then

v=Or()2=22=1

[r] is the sum of terms involving xi for 0iv in the Laurent series for r at . Therefore

[r]=i=0vaixi(8)=i=01aixi

Let a be the coefficient of xv=x1 in the above sum. The Laurent series of r at is

(9)rix43i2x39i2x727ix11405i2x151701ix1915309ix23144342ix27+

Comparing Eq. (9) with Eq. (8) shows that

a=i4

From Eq. (9) the sum up to v=1 gives

[r]=i=01aixi(10)=ix4

Now we need to find b, where b be the coefficient of xv1=x0=1 in r minus the coefficient of same term but in ([r])2 where [r] was found above in Eq (10). Hence

([r])2=x216

This shows that the coefficient of 1 in the above is 0. Now we need to find the coefficient of 1 in r. How this is done depends on if v=0 or not. Since v=1 which is not zero, then starting r=st, we do long division and write this in the form

r=Q+Rt

Where Q is the quotient and R is the remainder. Then the coefficient of 1 in r will be the coefficient this term in the quotient. Doing long division gives

r=st=x4+1216x2=Q+R16x2=(x216)+(34x2)=x216+34x2

We see that the coefficient of the term x in the quotient is 0. Now b can be found.

b=(0)(0)=0

Hence

[r]=ix4α+=12(bav)=12(0i41)=12α=12(bav)=12(0i41)=12

The following table summarizes the findings so far for poles and for the order of r at where r is

r=x4+1216x2

pole c location pole order [r]c αc+ αc
0 2 0 32 12

Order of r at [r] α+ α
2 ix4 12 12

Now that the all [r]c and its associated αc± have been determined for all the poles in the set Γ and [r] and its associated α± have also been found, the next step is to determine possible non negative integer d from these using

d=αs()cΓαcs(c)

Where s(c) is either + or and s() is the sign of α±. This is done by trial over all set of families s=(s(c))cΓ until such d is found to work in finding candidate ω. Trying α=12 then

d=α(αc1)=12(12)=0

Since d an integer and d0 then it can be used to find ω using

ω=cΓ(s(c)[r]c+αcs(c)xc)+s()[r]

The above gives

ω=(()[r]c1+αc1xc1)+()[r]=12x+()(ix4)=12xix4=12xix4

Now that ω is determined, the next step is find a corresponding minimal polynomial p(x) of degree d=0 to solve the ode. The polynomial p(x) needs to satisfy the equation

(1A)p+2ωp+(ω+ω2r)p=0

Let

(2A)p(x)=1

Substituting the above in eq. (1A) gives

(0)+2(12xix4)(0)+((12x2i4)+(12xix4)2(x4+1216x2))=00=0

The equation is satisfied since both sides are zero. Therefore the first solution to the ode z=rz is

z1(x)=peωdx=e(12xix4)dx=eix28x

The first solution to the original ode in y is found from

y1=z1e12BAdx=z1e1232x16x2dx=z1eln(x)=z1(1x)

Which simplifies to

y1=eix28x3/2

The second solution y2 to the original ode is found using reduction of order

y2=y1eBAdxy12dx

Substituting gives

y2=y1e32x16x2dx(y1)2dx=y1e2ln(x)(y1)2dx=y1(2ieix24)

Therefore the solution is

y=c1y1+c2y2=c1(eix28x3/2)+c2(eix28x3/2(2ieix24))

Will add steps showing solving for IC soon.

Maple. Time used: 0.013 (sec). Leaf size: 25
ode:=16*x^2*diff(diff(y(x),x),x)+32*diff(y(x),x)*x+(x^4-12)*y(x) = 0; 
dsolve(ode,y(x), singsol=all);
 
y=c1sin(x28)+c2cos(x28)x3/2

Maple trace

Methods for second order ODEs: 
--- Trying classification methods --- 
trying a quadrature 
checking if the LODE has constant coefficients 
checking if the LODE is of Euler type 
trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)] 
checking if the LODE is missing y 
-> Trying a Liouvillian solution using Kovacics algorithm 
   A Liouvillian solution exists 
   Group is reducible or imprimitive 
<- Kovacics algorithm successful
 

Maple step by step

Let’s solve16x2(ddxddxy(x))+32x(ddxy(x))+(x412)y(x)=0Highest derivative means the order of the ODE is2ddxddxy(x)Isolate 2nd derivativeddxddxy(x)=(x412)y(x)16x22(ddxy(x))xGroup terms withy(x)on the lhs of the ODE and the rest on the rhs of the ODE; ODE is linearddxddxy(x)+2(ddxy(x))x+(x412)y(x)16x2=0Check to see ifx0=0is a regular singular pointDefine functions[P2(x)=2x,P3(x)=x41216x2]xP2(x)is analytic atx=0(xP2(x))|x=0=2x2P3(x)is analytic atx=0(x2P3(x))|x=0=34x=0is a regular singular pointCheck to see ifx0=0is a regular singular pointx0=0Multiply by denominators16x2(ddxddxy(x))+32x(ddxy(x))+(x412)y(x)=0Assume series solution fory(x)y(x)=k=0akxk+rRewrite ODE with series expansionsConvertxmy(x)to series expansion form=0..4xmy(x)=k=0akxk+r+mShift index usingk>kmxmy(x)=k=makmxk+rConvertx(ddxy(x))to series expansionx(ddxy(x))=k=0ak(k+r)xk+rConvertx2(ddxddxy(x))to series expansionx2(ddxddxy(x))=k=0ak(k+r)(k+r1)xk+rRewrite ODE with series expansions4a0(3+2r)(1+2r)xr+4a1(5+2r)(1+2r)x1+r+4a2(7+2r)(3+2r)x2+r+4a3(9+2r)(5+2r)x3+r+(k=4(4ak(2k+2r+3)(2k+2r1)+ak4)xk+r)=0a0cannot be 0 by assumption, giving the indicial equation4(3+2r)(1+2r)=0Values of r that satisfy the indicial equationr{32,12}The coefficients of each power ofxmust be 0[4a1(5+2r)(1+2r)=0,4a2(7+2r)(3+2r)=0,4a3(9+2r)(5+2r)=0]Solve for the dependent coefficient(s){a1=0,a2=0,a3=0}Each term in the series must be 0, giving the recursion relation16(k+r12)(k+r+32)ak+ak4=0Shift index usingk>k+416(k+72+r)(k+112+r)ak+4+ak=0Recursion relation that defines series solution to ODEak+4=ak4(2k+7+2r)(2k+11+2r)Recursion relation forr=32ak+4=ak4(2k+4)(2k+8)Solution forr=32[y(x)=k=0akxk32,ak+4=ak4(2k+4)(2k+8),a1=0,a2=0,a3=0]Recursion relation forr=12ak+4=ak4(2k+8)(2k+12)Solution forr=12[y(x)=k=0akxk+12,ak+4=ak4(2k+8)(2k+12),a1=0,a2=0,a3=0]Combine solutions and rename parameters[y(x)=(k=0akxk32)+(k=0bkxk+12),ak+4=ak4(2k+4)(2k+8),a1=0,a2=0,a3=0,bk+4=bk4(2k+8)(2k+12),b1=0,b2=0,b3=0]
Mathematica. Time used: 0.103 (sec). Leaf size: 48
ode=16*x^2*D[y[x],{x,2}]+32*x*D[y[x],x]+(x^4-12)*y[x]==0; 
ic={}; 
DSolve[{ode,ic},y[x],x,IncludeSingularSolutions->True]
 
y(x)e12ix28(c12ic2e1+ix24)x3/2
Sympy. Time used: 0.241 (sec). Leaf size: 27
from sympy import * 
x = symbols("x") 
y = Function("y") 
ode = Eq(16*x**2*Derivative(y(x), (x, 2)) + 32*x*Derivative(y(x), x) + (x**4 - 12)*y(x),0) 
ics = {} 
dsolve(ode,func=y(x),ics=ics)
 
y(x)=C1J12(x28)+C2Y12(x28)x