2.1.772 Problem 794

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm
Maple
Mathematica
Sympy

Internal problem ID [9944]
Book : Collection of Kovacic problems
Section : section 1
Problem number : 794
Date solved : Sunday, March 30, 2025 at 02:50:06 PM
CAS classification : [[_2nd_order, _with_linear_symmetries]]

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm

Time used: 0.198 (sec)

Writing the ode as

(1)x2y+6xy+(4x2+6)y=0(2)Ay+By+Cy=0

Comparing (1) and (2) shows that

A=x2(3)B=6xC=4x2+6

Applying the Liouville transformation on the dependent variable gives

z(x)=yeB2Adx

Then (2) becomes

(4)z(x)=rz(x)

Where r is given by

(5)r=st=2AB2BA+B24AC4A2

Substituting the values of A,B,C from (3) in the above and simplifying gives

(6)r=41

Comparing the above to (5) shows that

s=4t=1

Therefore eq. (4) becomes

(7)z(x)=4z(x)

Equation (7) is now solved. After finding z(x) then y is found using the inverse transformation

y=z(x)eB2Adx

The first step is to determine the case of Kovacic algorithm this ode belongs to. There are 3 cases depending on the order of poles of r and the order of r at . The following table summarizes these cases.

Case

Allowed pole order for r

Allowed value for O()

1

{0,1,2,4,6,8,}

{,6,4,2,0,2,3,4,5,6,}

2

Need to have at least one pole that is either order 2 or odd order greater than 2. Any other pole order is allowed as long as the above condition is satisfied. Hence the following set of pole orders are all allowed. {1,2},{1,3},{2},{3},{3,4},{1,2,5}.

no condition

3

{1,2}

{2,3,4,5,6,7,}

Table 2.772: Necessary conditions for each Kovacic case

The order of r at is the degree of t minus the degree of s. Therefore

O()=deg(t)deg(s)=00=0

There are no poles in r. Therefore the set of poles Γ is empty. Since there is no odd order pole larger than 2 and the order at is 0 then the necessary conditions for case one are met. Therefore

L=[1]

Since r=4 is not a function of x, then there is no need run Kovacic algorithm to obtain a solution for transformed ode z=rz as one solution is

z1(x)=cos(2x)

Using the above, the solution for the original ode can now be found. The first solution to the original ode in y is found from

y1=z1e12BAdx=z1e126xx2dx=z1e3ln(x)=z1(1x3)

Which simplifies to

y1=cos(2x)x3

The second solution y2 to the original ode is found using reduction of order

y2=y1eBAdxy12dx

Substituting gives

y2=y1e6xx2dx(y1)2dx=y1e6ln(x)(y1)2dx=y1(tan(2x)2)

Therefore the solution is

y=c1y1+c2y2=c1(cos(2x)x3)+c2(cos(2x)x3(tan(2x)2))

Will add steps showing solving for IC soon.

Maple. Time used: 0.003 (sec). Leaf size: 21
ode:=x^2*diff(diff(y(x),x),x)+6*diff(y(x),x)*x+(4*x^2+6)*y(x) = 0; 
dsolve(ode,y(x), singsol=all);
 
y=c1sin(2x)+c2cos(2x)x3

Maple trace

Methods for second order ODEs: 
--- Trying classification methods --- 
trying a quadrature 
checking if the LODE has constant coefficients 
checking if the LODE is of Euler type 
trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)] 
checking if the LODE is missing y 
-> Trying a Liouvillian solution using Kovacics algorithm 
   A Liouvillian solution exists 
   Group is reducible or imprimitive 
<- Kovacics algorithm successful
 

Maple step by step

Let’s solvex2(ddxddxy(x))+6x(ddxy(x))+(4x2+6)y(x)=0Highest derivative means the order of the ODE is2ddxddxy(x)Isolate 2nd derivativeddxddxy(x)=2(2x2+3)y(x)x26(ddxy(x))xGroup terms withy(x)on the lhs of the ODE and the rest on the rhs of the ODE; ODE is linearddxddxy(x)+6(ddxy(x))x+2(2x2+3)y(x)x2=0Check to see ifx0=0is a regular singular pointDefine functions[P2(x)=6x,P3(x)=2(2x2+3)x2]xP2(x)is analytic atx=0(xP2(x))|x=0=6x2P3(x)is analytic atx=0(x2P3(x))|x=0=6x=0is a regular singular pointCheck to see ifx0=0is a regular singular pointx0=0Multiply by denominatorsx2(ddxddxy(x))+6x(ddxy(x))+(4x2+6)y(x)=0Assume series solution fory(x)y(x)=k=0akxk+rRewrite ODE with series expansionsConvertxmy(x)to series expansion form=0..2xmy(x)=k=0akxk+r+mShift index usingk>kmxmy(x)=k=makmxk+rConvertx(ddxy(x))to series expansionx(ddxy(x))=k=0ak(k+r)xk+rConvertx2(ddxddxy(x))to series expansionx2(ddxddxy(x))=k=0ak(k+r)(k+r1)xk+rRewrite ODE with series expansionsa0(3+r)(2+r)xr+a1(4+r)(3+r)x1+r+(k=2(ak(k+r+3)(k+r+2)+4ak2)xk+r)=0a0cannot be 0 by assumption, giving the indicial equation(3+r)(2+r)=0Values of r that satisfy the indicial equationr{3,2}Each term must be 0a1(4+r)(3+r)=0Solve for the dependent coefficient(s)a1=0Each term in the series must be 0, giving the recursion relationak(k+r+3)(k+r+2)+4ak2=0Shift index usingk>k+2ak+2(k+5+r)(k+4+r)+4ak=0Recursion relation that defines series solution to ODEak+2=4ak(k+5+r)(k+4+r)Recursion relation forr=3ak+2=4ak(k+2)(k+1)Solution forr=3[y(x)=k=0akxk3,ak+2=4ak(k+2)(k+1),a1=0]Recursion relation forr=2ak+2=4ak(k+3)(k+2)Solution forr=2[y(x)=k=0akxk2,ak+2=4ak(k+3)(k+2),a1=0]Combine solutions and rename parameters[y(x)=(k=0akxk3)+(k=0bkxk2),ak+2=4ak(k+2)(k+1),a1=0,bk+2=4bk(k+3)(k+2),b1=0]
Mathematica. Time used: 0.032 (sec). Leaf size: 37
ode=x^2*D[y[x],{x,2}]+6*x*D[y[x],x]+(4*x^2+6)*y[x]==0; 
ic={}; 
DSolve[{ode,ic},y[x],x,IncludeSingularSolutions->True]
 
y(x)4c1e2ixic2e2ix4x3
Sympy. Time used: 0.237 (sec). Leaf size: 24
from sympy import * 
x = symbols("x") 
y = Function("y") 
ode = Eq(x**2*Derivative(y(x), (x, 2)) + 6*x*Derivative(y(x), x) + (4*x**2 + 6)*y(x),0) 
ics = {} 
dsolve(ode,func=y(x),ics=ics)
 
y(x)=C1J12(2x)+C2Y12(2x)x52