2.1.783 Problem 805

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm
Maple
Mathematica
Sympy

Internal problem ID [9955]
Book : Collection of Kovacic problems
Section : section 1
Problem number : 805
Date solved : Sunday, March 30, 2025 at 02:50:20 PM
CAS classification : [[_2nd_order, _with_linear_symmetries]]

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm

Time used: 0.227 (sec)

Writing the ode as

(1)(x4+x2)y+(2x3+2x)y2y=0(2)Ay+By+Cy=0

Comparing (1) and (2) shows that

A=x4+x2(3)B=2x3+2xC=2

Applying the Liouville transformation on the dependent variable gives

z(x)=yeB2Adx

Then (2) becomes

(4)z(x)=rz(x)

Where r is given by

(5)r=st=2AB2BA+B24AC4A2

Substituting the values of A,B,C from (3) in the above and simplifying gives

(6)r=2x2(x21)

Comparing the above to (5) shows that

s=2t=x2(x21)

Therefore eq. (4) becomes

(7)z(x)=(2x2(x21))z(x)

Equation (7) is now solved. After finding z(x) then y is found using the inverse transformation

y=z(x)eB2Adx

The first step is to determine the case of Kovacic algorithm this ode belongs to. There are 3 cases depending on the order of poles of r and the order of r at . The following table summarizes these cases.

Case

Allowed pole order for r

Allowed value for O()

1

{0,1,2,4,6,8,}

{,6,4,2,0,2,3,4,5,6,}

2

Need to have at least one pole that is either order 2 or odd order greater than 2. Any other pole order is allowed as long as the above condition is satisfied. Hence the following set of pole orders are all allowed. {1,2},{1,3},{2},{3},{3,4},{1,2,5}.

no condition

3

{1,2}

{2,3,4,5,6,7,}

Table 2.783: Necessary conditions for each Kovacic case

The order of r at is the degree of t minus the degree of s. Therefore

O()=deg(t)deg(s)=40=4

The poles of r in eq. (7) and the order of each pole are determined by solving for the roots of t=x2(x21). There is a pole at x=0 of order 2. There is a pole at x=1 of order 1. There is a pole at x=1 of order 1. Since there is no odd order pole larger than 2 and the order at is 4 then the necessary conditions for case one are met. Since there is a pole of order 2 then necessary conditions for case two are met. Since pole order is not larger than 2 and the order at is 4 then the necessary conditions for case three are met. Therefore

L=[1,2,4,6,12]

Attempting to find a solution using case n=1.

Looking at poles of order 1. For the pole at x=1 of order 1 then

[r]c=0αc+=1αc=1

Looking at poles of order 2. The partial fractions decomposition of r is

r=1x+11x1+2x2

For the pole at x=0 let b be the coefficient of 1x2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=2. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=2αc=121+4b=1

Since the order of r at is 4>2 then

[r]=0α+=0α=1

The following table summarizes the findings so far for poles and for the order of r at where r is

r=2x2(x21)

pole c location pole order [r]c αc+ αc
1 1 0 0 1
0 2 0 2 1

Order of r at [r] α+ α
4 0 0 1

Now that the all [r]c and its associated αc± have been determined for all the poles in the set Γ and [r] and its associated α± have also been found, the next step is to determine possible non negative integer d from these using

d=αs()cΓαcs(c)

Where s(c) is either + or and s() is the sign of α±. This is done by trial over all set of families s=(s(c))cΓ until such d is found to work in finding candidate ω. Trying α=1 then

d=α(αc1+αc2)=1(0)=1

Since d an integer and d0 then it can be used to find ω using

ω=cΓ(s(c)[r]c+αcs(c)xc)+s()[r]

The above gives

ω=(()[r]c1+αc1xc1)+(()[r]c2+αc2xc2)+()[r]=1x11x+()(0)=1x11x=1x2x

Now that ω is determined, the next step is find a corresponding minimal polynomial p(x) of degree d=1 to solve the ode. The polynomial p(x) needs to satisfy the equation

(1A)p+2ωp+(ω+ω2r)p=0

Let

(2A)p(x)=x+a0

Substituting the above in eq. (1A) gives

(0)+2(1x11x)(1)+((1(x1)2+1x2)+(1x11x)2(2x2(x21)))=02a0+2x3x=0

Solving for the coefficients ai in the above using method of undetermined coefficients gives

{a0=1}

Substituting these coefficients in p(x) in eq. (2A) results in

p(x)=x+1

Therefore the first solution to the ode z=rz is

z1(x)=peωdx=(x+1)e(1x11x)dx=(x+1)eln(x)+ln(x1)=x21x

The first solution to the original ode in y is found from

y1=z1e12BAdx=z1e122x3+2xx4+x2dx=z1eln(x)=z1(1x)

Which simplifies to

y1=x21x2

The second solution y2 to the original ode is found using reduction of order

y2=y1eBAdxy12dx

Substituting gives

y2=y1e2x3+2xx4+x2dx(y1)2dx=y1e2ln(x)(y1)2dx=y1(14(x+1)ln(x+1)414(x1)+ln(x1)4)

Therefore the solution is

y=c1y1+c2y2=c1(x21x2)+c2(x21x2(14(x+1)ln(x+1)414(x1)+ln(x1)4))

Will add steps showing solving for IC soon.

Maple. Time used: 0.006 (sec). Leaf size: 47
ode:=x^2*(-x^2+1)*diff(diff(y(x),x),x)+2*x*(-x^2+1)*diff(y(x),x)-2*y(x) = 0; 
dsolve(ode,y(x), singsol=all);
 
y=c2(x21)ln(x1)+(x2+1)c2ln(x+1)+2c1x22c2x2c12x2

Maple trace

Methods for second order ODEs: 
--- Trying classification methods --- 
trying a quadrature 
checking if the LODE has constant coefficients 
checking if the LODE is of Euler type 
trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)] 
checking if the LODE is missing y 
-> Trying a Liouvillian solution using Kovacics algorithm 
   A Liouvillian solution exists 
   Reducible group (found an exponential solution) 
   Group is reducible, not completely reducible 
<- Kovacics algorithm successful
 

Mathematica. Time used: 0.291 (sec). Leaf size: 81
ode=x^2*(1-x^2)*D[y[x],{x,2}]+2*x*(1-x^2)*D[y[x],x]-2*y[x]==0; 
ic={}; 
DSolve[{ode,ic},y[x],x,IncludeSingularSolutions->True]
 
y(x)exp(1xK[1]2+1K[1]K[1]3dK[1])(c21xexp(21K[2]K[1]2+1K[1]K[1]3dK[1])dK[2]+c1)x
Sympy
from sympy import * 
x = symbols("x") 
y = Function("y") 
ode = Eq(x**2*(1 - x**2)*Derivative(y(x), (x, 2)) + 2*x*(1 - x**2)*Derivative(y(x), x) - 2*y(x),0) 
ics = {} 
dsolve(ode,func=y(x),ics=ics)
 
False