5.13 problem 13

5.13.1 Solving as exact ode
5.13.2 Maple step by step solution

Internal problem ID [1978]
Internal file name [OUTPUT/1978_Sunday_February_25_2024_06_43_59_AM_62142406/index.tex]

Book: Differential Equations by Alfred L. Nelson, Karl W. Folley, Max Coral. 3rd ed. DC heath. Boston. 1964
Section: Exercise 9, page 38
Problem number: 13.
ODE order: 1.
ODE degree: 1.

The type(s) of ODE detected by this program : "exactByInspection"

Maple gives the following as the ode type

[_rational]

\[ \boxed {\left (x^{2}+y^{2}+x \right ) y^{\prime }-y=0} \]

5.13.1 Solving as exact ode

Entering Exact first order ODE solver. (Form one type)

To solve an ode of the form\begin {equation} M\left ( x,y\right ) +N\left ( x,y\right ) \frac {dy}{dx}=0\tag {A} \end {equation} We assume there exists a function \(\phi \left ( x,y\right ) =c\) where \(c\) is constant, that satisfies the ode. Taking derivative of \(\phi \) w.r.t. \(x\) gives\[ \frac {d}{dx}\phi \left ( x,y\right ) =0 \] Hence\begin {equation} \frac {\partial \phi }{\partial x}+\frac {\partial \phi }{\partial y}\frac {dy}{dx}=0\tag {B} \end {equation} Comparing (A,B) shows that\begin {align*} \frac {\partial \phi }{\partial x} & =M\\ \frac {\partial \phi }{\partial y} & =N \end {align*}

But since \(\frac {\partial ^{2}\phi }{\partial x\partial y}=\frac {\partial ^{2}\phi }{\partial y\partial x}\) then for the above to be valid, we require that\[ \frac {\partial M}{\partial y}=\frac {\partial N}{\partial x}\] If the above condition is satisfied, then the original ode is called exact. We still need to determine \(\phi \left ( x,y\right ) \) but at least we know now that we can do that since the condition \(\frac {\partial ^{2}\phi }{\partial x\partial y}=\frac {\partial ^{2}\phi }{\partial y\partial x}\) is satisfied. If this condition is not satisfied then this method will not work and we have to now look for an integrating factor to force this condition, which might or might not exist. The first step is to write the ODE in standard form to check for exactness, which is \[ M(x,y) \mathop {\mathrm {d}x}+ N(x,y) \mathop {\mathrm {d}y}=0 \tag {1A} \] Therefore \begin {align*} \left (x^{2}+y^{2}+x\right )\mathop {\mathrm {d}y} &= \left (y\right )\mathop {\mathrm {d}x}\\ \left (-y\right )\mathop {\mathrm {d}x} + \left (x^{2}+y^{2}+x\right )\mathop {\mathrm {d}y} &= 0 \tag {2A} \end {align*}

Comparing (1A) and (2A) shows that \begin {align*} M(x,y) &= -y\\ N(x,y) &= x^{2}+y^{2}+x \end {align*}

The next step is to determine if the ODE is is exact or not. The ODE is exact when the following condition is satisfied \[ \frac {\partial M}{\partial y} = \frac {\partial N}{\partial x} \] Using result found above gives \begin {align*} \frac {\partial M}{\partial y} &= \frac {\partial }{\partial y} \left (-y\right )\\ &= -1 \end {align*}

And \begin {align*} \frac {\partial N}{\partial x} &= \frac {\partial }{\partial x} \left (x^{2}+y^{2}+x\right )\\ &= 2 x +1 \end {align*}

Since \(\frac {\partial M}{\partial y} \neq \frac {\partial N}{\partial x}\), then the ODE is not exact. By inspection \(\frac {1}{x^{2}+y^{2}}\) is an integrating factor. Therefore by multiplying \(M=-y\) and \(N=x^{2}+y^{2}+x\) by this integrating factor the ode becomes exact. The new \(M,N\) are \begin{align*} M&=-\frac {y}{x^{2}+y^{2}} \\ N&=\frac {x^{2}+y^{2}+x}{x^{2}+y^{2}} \\ \end{align*}

To solve an ode of the form\begin {equation} M\left ( x,y\right ) +N\left ( x,y\right ) \frac {dy}{dx}=0\tag {A} \end {equation} We assume there exists a function \(\phi \left ( x,y\right ) =c\) where \(c\) is constant, that satisfies the ode. Taking derivative of \(\phi \) w.r.t. \(x\) gives\[ \frac {d}{dx}\phi \left ( x,y\right ) =0 \] Hence\begin {equation} \frac {\partial \phi }{\partial x}+\frac {\partial \phi }{\partial y}\frac {dy}{dx}=0\tag {B} \end {equation} Comparing (A,B) shows that\begin {align*} \frac {\partial \phi }{\partial x} & =M\\ \frac {\partial \phi }{\partial y} & =N \end {align*}

But since \(\frac {\partial ^{2}\phi }{\partial x\partial y}=\frac {\partial ^{2}\phi }{\partial y\partial x}\) then for the above to be valid, we require that\[ \frac {\partial M}{\partial y}=\frac {\partial N}{\partial x}\] If the above condition is satisfied, then the original ode is called exact. We still need to determine \(\phi \left ( x,y\right ) \) but at least we know now that we can do that since the condition \(\frac {\partial ^{2}\phi }{\partial x\partial y}=\frac {\partial ^{2}\phi }{\partial y\partial x}\) is satisfied. If this condition is not satisfied then this method will not work and we have to now look for an integrating factor to force this condition, which might or might not exist. The first step is to write the ODE in standard form to check for exactness, which is \[ M(x,y) \mathop {\mathrm {d}x}+ N(x,y) \mathop {\mathrm {d}y}=0 \tag {1A} \] Therefore \begin {align*} \left (\frac {x^{2}+y^{2}+x}{x^{2}+y^{2}}\right )\mathop {\mathrm {d}y} &= \left (\frac {y}{x^{2}+y^{2}}\right )\mathop {\mathrm {d}x}\\ \left (-\frac {y}{x^{2}+y^{2}}\right )\mathop {\mathrm {d}x} + \left (\frac {x^{2}+y^{2}+x}{x^{2}+y^{2}}\right )\mathop {\mathrm {d}y} &= 0 \tag {2A} \end {align*}

Comparing (1A) and (2A) shows that \begin {align*} M(x,y) &= -\frac {y}{x^{2}+y^{2}}\\ N(x,y) &= \frac {x^{2}+y^{2}+x}{x^{2}+y^{2}} \end {align*}

The next step is to determine if the ODE is is exact or not. The ODE is exact when the following condition is satisfied \[ \frac {\partial M}{\partial y} = \frac {\partial N}{\partial x} \] Using result found above gives \begin {align*} \frac {\partial M}{\partial y} &= \frac {\partial }{\partial y} \left (-\frac {y}{x^{2}+y^{2}}\right )\\ &= \frac {-x^{2}+y^{2}}{\left (x^{2}+y^{2}\right )^{2}} \end {align*}

And \begin {align*} \frac {\partial N}{\partial x} &= \frac {\partial }{\partial x} \left (\frac {x^{2}+y^{2}+x}{x^{2}+y^{2}}\right )\\ &= \frac {-x^{2}+y^{2}}{\left (x^{2}+y^{2}\right )^{2}} \end {align*}

Since \(\frac {\partial M}{\partial y}= \frac {\partial N}{\partial x}\), then the ODE is exact The following equations are now set up to solve for the function \(\phi \left (x,y\right )\) \begin {align*} \frac {\partial \phi }{\partial x } &= M\tag {1} \\ \frac {\partial \phi }{\partial y } &= N\tag {2} \end {align*}

Integrating (1) w.r.t. \(x\) gives \begin{align*} \int \frac {\partial \phi }{\partial x} \mathop {\mathrm {d}x} &= \int M\mathop {\mathrm {d}x} \\ \int \frac {\partial \phi }{\partial x} \mathop {\mathrm {d}x} &= \int -\frac {y}{x^{2}+y^{2}}\mathop {\mathrm {d}x} \\ \tag{3} \phi &= -\arctan \left (\frac {x}{y}\right )+ f(y) \\ \end{align*} Where \(f(y)\) is used for the constant of integration since \(\phi \) is a function of both \(x\) and \(y\). Taking derivative of equation (3) w.r.t \(y\) gives \begin{align*} \tag{4} \frac {\partial \phi }{\partial y} &= \frac {x}{y^{2} \left (\frac {x^{2}}{y^{2}}+1\right )}+f'(y) \\ &=\frac {x}{x^{2}+y^{2}}+f'(y) \\ \end{align*} But equation (2) says that \(\frac {\partial \phi }{\partial y} = \frac {x^{2}+y^{2}+x}{x^{2}+y^{2}}\). Therefore equation (4) becomes \begin{equation} \tag{5} \frac {x^{2}+y^{2}+x}{x^{2}+y^{2}} = \frac {x}{x^{2}+y^{2}}+f'(y) \end{equation} Solving equation (5) for \( f'(y)\) gives \[ f'(y) = 1 \] Integrating the above w.r.t \(y\) gives \begin{align*} \int f'(y) \mathop {\mathrm {d}y} &= \int \left ( 1\right ) \mathop {\mathrm {d}y} \\ f(y) &= y+ c_{1} \\ \end{align*} Where \(c_{1}\) is constant of integration. Substituting result found above for \(f(y)\) into equation (3) gives \(\phi \) \[ \phi = -\arctan \left (\frac {x}{y}\right )+y+ c_{1} \] But since \(\phi \) itself is a constant function, then let \(\phi =c_{2}\) where \(c_{2}\) is new constant and combining \(c_{1}\) and \(c_{2}\) constants into new constant \(c_{1}\) gives the solution as \[ c_{1} = -\arctan \left (\frac {x}{y}\right )+y \]

Summary

The solution(s) found are the following \begin{align*} \tag{1} -\arctan \left (\frac {x}{y}\right )+y &= c_{1} \\ \end{align*}

Figure 224: Slope field plot

Verification of solutions

\[ -\arctan \left (\frac {x}{y}\right )+y = c_{1} \] Verified OK.

5.13.2 Maple step by step solution

\[ \begin {array}{lll} & {} & \textrm {Let's solve}\hspace {3pt} \\ {} & {} & \left (x^{2}+y^{2}+x \right ) y^{\prime }-y=0 \\ \bullet & {} & \textrm {Highest derivative means the order of the ODE is}\hspace {3pt} 1 \\ {} & {} & y^{\prime } \\ \bullet & {} & \textrm {Solve for the highest derivative}\hspace {3pt} \\ {} & {} & y^{\prime }=\frac {y}{x^{2}+y^{2}+x} \end {array} \]

Maple trace

`Methods for first order ODEs: 
--- Trying classification methods --- 
trying a quadrature 
trying 1st order linear 
trying Bernoulli 
trying separable 
trying inverse linear 
trying homogeneous types: 
trying Chini 
differential order: 1; looking for linear symmetries 
trying exact 
Looking for potential symmetries 
trying inverse_Riccati 
trying Riccati sub-methods: 
   <- Riccati particular polynomial solution successful 
<- inverse_Riccati successful`
 

Solution by Maple

Time used: 0.047 (sec). Leaf size: 40

dsolve((x^2+y(x)^2+x)*diff(y(x),x)=y(x),y(x), singsol=all)
 

\[ \frac {{\mathrm e}^{-2 i y \left (x \right )} \left (i x +y \left (x \right )\right )+2 c_{1} \left (x +i y \left (x \right )\right )}{2 i y \left (x \right )+2 x} = 0 \]

Solution by Mathematica

Time used: 0.099 (sec). Leaf size: 18

DSolve[(x^2+y[x]^2+x)*y'[x]==y[x],y[x],x,IncludeSingularSolutions -> True]
 

\[ \text {Solve}\left [y(x)-\arctan \left (\frac {x}{y(x)}\right )=c_1,y(x)\right ] \]