2.5.20 Problem 20

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm
Maple
Mathematica
Sympy

Internal problem ID [8980]
Book : Own collection of miscellaneous problems
Section : section 5.0
Problem number : 20
Date solved : Friday, April 25, 2025 at 05:32:42 PM
CAS classification : [[_2nd_order, _with_linear_symmetries]]

Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm

Time used: 0.237 (sec)

Solve

xy(2x+1)y+(x+1)y=0

Writing the ode as

(1)xy+(2x1)y+(x+1)y=0(2)Ay+By+Cy=0

Comparing (1) and (2) shows that

A=x(3)B=2x1C=x+1

Applying the Liouville transformation on the dependent variable gives

z(x)=yeB2Adx

Then (2) becomes

(4)z(x)=rz(x)

Where r is given by

(5)r=st=2AB2BA+B24AC4A2

Substituting the values of A,B,C from (3) in the above and simplifying gives

(6)r=34x2

Comparing the above to (5) shows that

s=3t=4x2

Therefore eq. (4) becomes

(7)z(x)=(34x2)z(x)

Equation (7) is now solved. After finding z(x) then y is found using the inverse transformation

y=z(x)eB2Adx

The first step is to determine the case of Kovacic algorithm this ode belongs to. There are 3 cases depending on the order of poles of r and the order of r at . The following table summarizes these cases.

Case

Allowed pole order for r

Allowed value for O()

1

{0,1,2,4,6,8,}

{,6,4,2,0,2,3,4,5,6,}

2

Need to have at least one pole that is either order 2 or odd order greater than 2. Any other pole order is allowed as long as the above condition is satisfied. Hence the following set of pole orders are all allowed. {1,2},{1,3},{2},{3},{3,4},{1,2,5}.

no condition

3

{1,2}

{2,3,4,5,6,7,}

Table 2.126: Necessary conditions for each Kovacic case

The order of r at is the degree of t minus the degree of s. Therefore

O()=deg(t)deg(s)=20=2

The poles of r in eq. (7) and the order of each pole are determined by solving for the roots of t=4x2. There is a pole at x=0 of order 2. Since there is no odd order pole larger than 2 and the order at is 2 then the necessary conditions for case one are met. Since there is a pole of order 2 then necessary conditions for case two are met. Since pole order is not larger than 2 and the order at is 2 then the necessary conditions for case three are met. Therefore

L=[1,2,4,6,12]

Attempting to find a solution using case n=1.

Looking at poles of order 2. The partial fractions decomposition of r is

r=34x2

For the pole at x=0 let b be the coefficient of 1x2 in the partial fractions decomposition of r given above. Therefore b=34. Hence

[r]c=0αc+=12+1+4b=32αc=121+4b=12

Since the order of r at is 2 then [r]=0. Let b be the coefficient of 1x2 in the Laurent series expansion of r at . which can be found by dividing the leading coefficient of s by the leading coefficient of t from

r=st=34x2

Since the gcd(s,t)=1. This gives b=34. Hence

[r]=0α+=12+1+4b=32α=121+4b=12

The following table summarizes the findings so far for poles and for the order of r at where r is

r=34x2

pole c location pole order [r]c αc+ αc
0 2 0 32 12

Order of r at [r] α+ α
2 0 32 12

Now that the all [r]c and its associated αc± have been determined for all the poles in the set Γ and [r] and its associated α± have also been found, the next step is to determine possible non negative integer d from these using

d=αs()cΓαcs(c)

Where s(c) is either + or and s() is the sign of α±. This is done by trial over all set of families s=(s(c))cΓ until such d is found to work in finding candidate ω. Trying α=12 then

d=α(αc1)=12(12)=0

Since d an integer and d0 then it can be used to find ω using

ω=cΓ(s(c)[r]c+αcs(c)xc)+s()[r]

The above gives

ω=(()[r]c1+αc1xc1)+()[r]=12x+()(0)=12x=12x

Now that ω is determined, the next step is find a corresponding minimal polynomial p(x) of degree d=0 to solve the ode. The polynomial p(x) needs to satisfy the equation

(1A)p+2ωp+(ω+ω2r)p=0

Let

(2A)p(x)=1

Substituting the above in eq. (1A) gives

(0)+2(12x)(0)+((12x2)+(12x)2(34x2))=00=0

The equation is satisfied since both sides are zero. Therefore the first solution to the ode z=rz is

z1(x)=peωdx=e12xdx=1x

The first solution to the original ode in y is found from

y1=z1e12BAdx=z1e122x1xdx=z1ex+ln(x)2=z1(xex)

Which simplifies to

y1=ex

The second solution y2 to the original ode is found using reduction of order

y2=y1eBAdxy12dx

Substituting gives

y2=y1e2x1xdx(y1)2dx=y1e2x+ln(x)(y1)2dx=y1(xe2x+ln(x)e2x2)

Therefore the solution is

y=c1y1+c2y2=c1(ex)+c2(ex(xe2x+ln(x)e2x2))

Will add steps showing solving for IC soon.

Summary of solutions found

y=c1ex+c2exx22
Maple. Time used: 0.003 (sec). Leaf size: 14
ode:=x*diff(diff(y(x),x),x)-(2*x+1)*diff(y(x),x)+(1+x)*y(x) = 0; 
dsolve(ode,y(x), singsol=all);
 
y=ex(c2x2+c1)

Maple trace

Methods for second order ODEs: 
--- Trying classification methods --- 
trying a quadrature 
checking if the LODE has constant coefficients 
checking if the LODE is of Euler type 
trying a symmetry of the form [xi=0, eta=F(x)] 
checking if the LODE is missing y 
-> Trying a Liouvillian solution using Kovacics algorithm 
   A Liouvillian solution exists 
   Reducible group (found an exponential solution) 
<- Kovacics algorithm successful
 

Maple step by step

Let’s solvex(ddxddxy(x))(2x+1)(ddxy(x))+(x+1)y(x)=0Highest derivative means the order of the ODE is2ddxddxy(x)Isolate 2nd derivativeddxddxy(x)=(x+1)y(x)x+(2x+1)(ddxy(x))xGroup terms withy(x)on the lhs of the ODE and the rest on the rhs of the ODE; ODE is linearddxddxy(x)(2x+1)(ddxy(x))x+(x+1)y(x)x=0Check to see ifx0=0is a regular singular pointDefine functions[P2(x)=2x+1x,P3(x)=x+1x]xP2(x)is analytic atx=0(xP2(x))|x=0=1x2P3(x)is analytic atx=0(x2P3(x))|x=0=0x=0is a regular singular pointCheck to see ifx0=0is a regular singular pointx0=0Multiply by denominatorsx(ddxddxy(x))+(2x1)(ddxy(x))+(x+1)y(x)=0Assume series solution fory(x)y(x)=k=0akxk+rRewrite ODE with series expansionsConvertxmy(x)to series expansion form=0..1xmy(x)=k=0akxk+r+mShift index usingk>kmxmy(x)=k=makmxk+rConvertxm(ddxy(x))to series expansion form=0..1xm(ddxy(x))=k=0ak(k+r)xk+r1+mShift index usingk>k+1mxm(ddxy(x))=k=1+mak+1m(k+1m+r)xk+rConvertx(ddxddxy(x))to series expansionx(ddxddxy(x))=k=0ak(k+r)(k+r1)xk+r1Shift index usingk>k+1x(ddxddxy(x))=k=1ak+1(k+1+r)(k+r)xk+rRewrite ODE with series expansionsa0r(2+r)x1+r+(a1(1+r)(1+r)a0(1+2r))xr+(k=1(ak+1(k+1+r)(k+r1)ak(2k+2r1)+ak1)xk+r)=0a0cannot be 0 by assumption, giving the indicial equationr(2+r)=0Values of r that satisfy the indicial equationr{0,2}Each term must be 0a1(1+r)(1+r)a0(1+2r)=0Each term in the series must be 0, giving the recursion relationak+1(k+1+r)(k+r1)+ak(2k2r+1)+ak1=0Shift index usingk>k+1ak+2(k+2+r)(k+r)+ak+1(2k12r)+ak=0Recursion relation that defines series solution to ODEak+2=2kak+1+2rak+1ak+ak+1(k+2+r)(k+r)Recursion relation forr=0ak+2=2kak+1ak+ak+1(k+2)kSeries not valid forr=0, division by0in the recursion relation atk=0ak+2=2kak+1ak+ak+1(k+2)kRecursion relation forr=2ak+2=2kak+1ak+5ak+1(k+4)(k+2)Solution forr=2[y(x)=k=0akxk+2,ak+2=2kak+1ak+5ak+1(k+4)(k+2),3a13a0=0]
Mathematica. Time used: 0.026 (sec). Leaf size: 23
ode=x*D[y[x],{x,2}]-(2*x+1)*D[y[x],x]+(x+1)*y[x]==0; 
ic={}; 
DSolve[{ode,ic},y[x],x,IncludeSingularSolutions->True]
 
y(x)12ex(c2x2+2c1)
Sympy
from sympy import * 
x = symbols("x") 
y = Function("y") 
ode = Eq(x*Derivative(y(x), (x, 2)) + (x + 1)*y(x) - (2*x + 1)*Derivative(y(x), x),0) 
ics = {} 
dsolve(ode,func=y(x),ics=ics)
 
False