3.5.3.10 Example 10
is put in normal form (by replacing with ) which gives
where . Since then this is d’Almbert ode. Taking derivative and simplifying gives
Using values for the above simplifies to
The singular solution is found by setting which results in . This gives no real solution for Hence no singular solution exists.
The general solution is when in (2A). Since (2A) is nonlinear, inversion is needed.
Integrating gives
Therefore
There are now two choices to take. The first is by solving for from the above in terms of and substituting the result in (1) to obtain explicit solution for , and the second choice is by solving for algebraically from (1) and substituting the result in (3). The second choice is easier in this case but gives an implicit solution. Solving for from (1)
gives
Substituting each one of these solutions back in (3) gives two implicit solutions