Internal
problem
ID
[10226] Book
:
Own
collection
of
miscellaneous
problems Section
:
section
4.0 Problem
number
:
60 Date
solved
:
Monday, December 08, 2025 at 07:51:01 PM CAS
classification
:
[_quadrature]
for \(y\). This is because we had to divide by this in the above step. This gives the following singular
solution(s), which also have to satisfy the given ODE.
\begin{align*} y = -1\\ y = 0 \end{align*}
The following diagram is the phase line diagram. It classifies each of the above equilibrium
points as stable or not stable or semi-stable.
Solving for \(y\) gives
\begin{align*}
y &= -1 \\
y &= 0 \\
y &= \frac {\sqrt {\left ({\mathrm e}^{2 x +2 c_1}-1\right ) {\mathrm e}^{2 x +2 c_1}}}{{\mathrm e}^{2 x +2 c_1}-1} \\
y &= -\frac {\sqrt {\left ({\mathrm e}^{2 x +2 c_1}-1\right ) {\mathrm e}^{2 x +2 c_1}}}{{\mathrm e}^{2 x +2 c_1}-1} \\
\end{align*}
The next step is use the
substitution \(v = y^{1-n}\) in equation (3) which generates a new ODE in \(v \left (x \right )\) which will be linear and can be
easily solved using an integrating factor. Backsubstitution then gives the solution \(y(x)\) which is what
we want.
This method is now applied to the ODE at hand. Comparing the ODE (1) With (2) Shows that
\begin{align*} f_0(x)&=1\\ f_1(x)&=-1\\ n &=3 \end{align*}
Dividing both sides of ODE (1) by \(y^n=y^{3}\) gives
Substituting equations (5) and (6) into equation (4) gives
\begin{align*} -\frac {v^{\prime }\left (x \right )}{2}&= v \left (x \right )-1\\ v' &= -2 v +2 \tag {7} \end{align*}
The above now is a linear ODE in \(v \left (x \right )\) which is now solved.
Integrating gives
\begin{align*} \int \frac {1}{-2 v +2}d v &= dx\\ -\frac {\ln \left (-v +1\right )}{2}&= x +c_1 \end{align*}
Singular solutions are found by solving
\begin{align*} -2 v +2&= 0 \end{align*}
for \(v \left (x \right )\). This is because we had to divide by this in the above step. This gives the following singular
solution(s), which also have to satisfy the given ODE.
\begin{align*} v \left (x \right ) = 1 \end{align*}
The substitution \(v = y^{1-n}\) is now used to convert the above solution back to \(y\) which results in
We assume there exists a function \(\phi \left ( x,y\right ) =c\) where \(c\) is constant, that
satisfies the ode. Taking derivative of \(\phi \) w.r.t. \(x\) gives
But since \(\frac {\partial ^{2}\phi }{\partial x\partial y}=\frac {\partial ^{2}\phi }{\partial y\partial x}\) then for the above to be valid, we require that
If the above condition is satisfied, then
the original ode is called exact. We still need to determine \(\phi \left ( x,y\right ) \) but at least we know now that we can
do that since the condition \(\frac {\partial ^{2}\phi }{\partial x\partial y}=\frac {\partial ^{2}\phi }{\partial y\partial x}\) is satisfied. If this condition is not satisfied then this method will not
work and we have to now look for an integrating factor to force this condition, which might or
might not exist. The first step is to write the ODE in standard form to check for exactness, which
is
Since \(\frac {\partial M}{\partial y} \neq \frac {\partial N}{\partial x}\), then the ODE is not exact. Since the ODE is not exact, we will try to find an integrating
factor to make it exact. Let
\(M\) and \(N\) are now multiplied by this integrating factor, giving new \(M\) and new \(N\) which are called \(\overline {M}\) and \(\overline {N}\)
so not to confuse them with the original \(M\) and \(N\).
Where \(f(y)\) is used for the constant of integration since \(\phi \) is a function of
both \(x\) and \(y\). Taking derivative of equation (3) w.r.t \(y\) gives
But since \(\phi \) itself is a constant function, then let \(\phi =c_2\) where \(c_2\) is new constant and
combining \(c_1\) and \(c_2\) constants into the constant \(c_1\) gives the solution as