2.1.90 Problem 88

Existence and uniqueness analysis
Solved as second order linear constant coeff ode
Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm
Maple
Mathematica
Sympy

Internal problem ID [8801]
Book : Own collection of miscellaneous problems
Section : section 1.0
Problem number : 88
Date solved : Friday, April 25, 2025 at 05:11:32 PM
CAS classification : [[_2nd_order, _missing_x]]

Existence and uniqueness analysis

Solve

y+y+y=0

With initial conditions

y(0)=0y(0)=1

This is a linear ODE. In canonical form it is written as

y+p(x)y+q(x)y=F

Where here

p(x)=1q(x)=1F=0

Hence the ode is

y+y+y=0

The domain of p(x)=1 is

{<x<}

And the point x0=0 is inside this domain. The domain of q(x)=1 is

{<x<}

And the point x0=0 is also inside this domain. Hence solution exists and is unique.

Solved as second order linear constant coeff ode

Time used: 0.223 (sec)

Solve

y+y+y=0

With initial conditions

y(0)=0y(0)=1

This is second order with constant coefficients homogeneous ODE. In standard form the ODE is

Ay(x)+By(x)+Cy(x)=0

Where in the above A=1,B=1,C=1. Let the solution be y=eλx. Substituting this into the ODE gives

(1)λ2exλ+λexλ+exλ=0

Since exponential function is never zero, then dividing Eq(2) throughout by eλx gives

(2)λ2+λ+1=0

Equation (2) is the characteristic equation of the ODE. Its roots determine the general solution form.Using the quadratic formula

λ1,2=B2A±12AB24AC

Substituting A=1,B=1,C=1 into the above gives

λ1,2=1(2)(1)±1(2)(1)12(4)(1)(1)=12±i32

Hence

λ1=12+i32λ2=12i32

Which simplifies to

λ1=12+i32λ2=12i32

Since roots are complex conjugate of each others, then let the roots be

λ1,2=α±iβ

Where α=12 and β=32. Therefore the final solution, when using Euler relation, can be written as

y=eαx(c1cos(βx)+c2sin(βx))

Which becomes

y=ex2(c1cos(3x2)+c2sin(3x2))

Will add steps showing solving for IC soon.

Summary of solutions found

y=ex2(cos(3x2)+3sin(3x2)3)
Solution plot Slope field y+y+y=0
Solved as second order ode using Kovacic algorithm

Time used: 0.303 (sec)

Solve

y+y+y=0

With initial conditions

y(0)=0y(0)=1

Writing the ode as

(1)y+y+y=0(2)Ay+By+Cy=0

Comparing (1) and (2) shows that

A=1(3)B=1C=1

Applying the Liouville transformation on the dependent variable gives

z(x)=yeB2Adx

Then (2) becomes

(4)z(x)=rz(x)

Where r is given by

(5)r=st=2AB2BA+B24AC4A2

Substituting the values of A,B,C from (3) in the above and simplifying gives

(6)r=34

Comparing the above to (5) shows that

s=3t=4

Therefore eq. (4) becomes

(7)z(x)=3z(x)4

Equation (7) is now solved. After finding z(x) then y is found using the inverse transformation

y=z(x)eB2Adx

The first step is to determine the case of Kovacic algorithm this ode belongs to. There are 3 cases depending on the order of poles of r and the order of r at . The following table summarizes these cases.

Case

Allowed pole order for r

Allowed value for O()

1

{0,1,2,4,6,8,}

{,6,4,2,0,2,3,4,5,6,}

2

Need to have at least one pole that is either order 2 or odd order greater than 2. Any other pole order is allowed as long as the above condition is satisfied. Hence the following set of pole orders are all allowed. {1,2},{1,3},{2},{3},{3,4},{1,2,5}.

no condition

3

{1,2}

{2,3,4,5,6,7,}

Table 2.28: Necessary conditions for each Kovacic case

The order of r at is the degree of t minus the degree of s. Therefore

O()=deg(t)deg(s)=00=0

There are no poles in r. Therefore the set of poles Γ is empty. Since there is no odd order pole larger than 2 and the order at is 0 then the necessary conditions for case one are met. Therefore

L=[1]

Since r=34 is not a function of x, then there is no need run Kovacic algorithm to obtain a solution for transformed ode z=rz as one solution is

z1(x)=cos(3x2)

Using the above, the solution for the original ode can now be found. The first solution to the original ode in y is found from

y1=z1e12BAdx=z1e1211dx=z1ex2=z1(ex2)

Which simplifies to

y1=ex2cos(3x2)

The second solution y2 to the original ode is found using reduction of order

y2=y1eBAdxy12dx

Substituting gives

y2=y1e11dx(y1)2dx=y1ex(y1)2dx=y1(23tan(3x2)3)

Therefore the solution is

y=c1y1+c2y2=c1(ex2cos(3x2))+c2(ex2cos(3x2)(23tan(3x2)3))

Will add steps showing solving for IC soon.

Summary of solutions found

y=ex2cos(3x2)+ex23sin(3x2)3
Solution plot Slope field y+y+y=0
Maple. Time used: 0.109 (sec). Leaf size: 31
ode:=diff(diff(y(x),x),x)+diff(y(x),x)+y(x) = 0; 
ic:=D(y)(0) = 0, y(0) = 1; 
dsolve([ode,ic],y(x), singsol=all);
 
y=ex2(3sin(3x2)+3cos(3x2))3

Maple trace

Methods for second order ODEs: 
--- Trying classification methods --- 
trying a quadrature 
checking if the LODE has constant coefficients 
<- constant coefficients successful
 

Maple step by step

Let’s solve[ddxddxy(x)+ddxy(x)+y(x)=0,(ddxy(x))|{x=0}=0,y(0)=1]Highest derivative means the order of the ODE is2ddxddxy(x)Characteristic polynomial of ODEr2+r+1=0Use quadratic formula to solve forrr=(1)±(3)2Roots of the characteristic polynomialr=(12I32,12+I32)1st solution of the ODEy1(x)=ex2cos(3x2)2nd solution of the ODEy2(x)=ex2sin(3x2)General solution of the ODEy(x)=C1y1(x)+C2y2(x)Substitute in solutionsy(x)=C1ex2cos(3x2)+C2ex2sin(3x2)Check validity of solutiony(x)=_C1ex2cos(3x2)+_C2ex2sin(3x2)Use initial conditiony(0)=11=_C1Compute derivative of the solutionddxy(x)=_C1ex2cos(3x2)2_C1ex23sin(3x2)2_C2ex2sin(3x2)2+_C2ex23cos(3x2)2Use the initial condition(ddxy(x))|{x=0}=00=_C12+_C232Solve for_C1and_C2{_C1=1,_C2=33}Substitute constant values into general solution and simplifyy(x)=ex2(3sin(3x2)+3cos(3x2))3Solution to the IVPy(x)=ex2(3sin(3x2)+3cos(3x2))3
Mathematica. Time used: 0.022 (sec). Leaf size: 47
ode=D[y[x],{x,2}]+D[y[x],x]+y[x]==0; 
ic={Derivative[1][y][0] ==0,y[0]==1}; 
DSolve[{ode,ic},y[x],x,IncludeSingularSolutions->True]
 
y(x)13ex/2(3sin(3x2)+3cos(3x2))
Sympy. Time used: 0.183 (sec). Leaf size: 34
from sympy import * 
x = symbols("x") 
y = Function("y") 
ode = Eq(y(x) + Derivative(y(x), x) + Derivative(y(x), (x, 2)),0) 
ics = {Subs(Derivative(y(x), x), x, 0): 0, y(0): 1} 
dsolve(ode,func=y(x),ics=ics)
 
y(x)=(3sin(3x2)3+cos(3x2))ex2